SKINR's experiment results and pictures are here:
http://www.quantumheat.org/ind…lowstick-type-replication
Tarun
Member
- Member since May 9th 2015
- Last Activity:
Posts by Tarun
-
-
So the first attempt failed. But they did not replicate, did their own thing. Not wise.
-
:coffee: :hmm:
-
@Me
Jeff is now saying that the radiation is an error and probably there is radioactive dust, nothing from wire.
Do you think you are facing similar problem ? -
Thank you barty.
I'm really hoping that this experiment of Jeff will evolve into DIY lenr kits. Its so simple to do.After that happens, I won't mind if this entire forum is taken over by noisy text book thumpers.
-
Dear Mods,
I'm sorry I can't hear the signal in midst of meaning less noise here.
Would you like to take some action?This place is for lenr enthusiasts and researchers who are trying to solve energy problems of the world, not a small thing, but every small contribution matters. Those who think that lenr is a pseudoscience should seek other scientific places. This is also not a place to study people.
I can barely see any discussion by the researcher himself or any offers of help by others. All I see is negativity and attempts to discourage further research. Why are mods allowing this ?
-
So I'm skeptical that ambient dust is a factor, but I'll run the experiment to confirm.
I agree. Its a ridiculous idea that dust can cause 7x background radiation. If it does it should not fall off, should remain constant or grow. There is a clear correlation with start of heating.
Anyway, I'm waiting for your control experiment with any other wire and any other gas. It should settle the matter forever. -
Congratulations me !
Are you planning to do an experiment live for all of us?
and will you release the data (and calibration data)? -
Nice !
More evidence.
May be the VERY long length of wire you used was a factor in getting such a strong signal. MFMP is struggling with tiny wires, which may have caused some signal but undetectable. -
How did the figure of 100W came? Any calibrations or indirectly calculated ?
-
Essentially he repeated the experiment with all the errors/objections as before:
1- No calibration (if the Chinese text mentions it, please let us know)
2- No B type TC (K type shows the same behavior which a faulty TC would show)
3- No correlation between T1 and T2
4- No calorimetry (One would switch to calorimetry as soon as positive results are obtained to verify them)
5- No radiation measurementsIts sad that I must call it inconclusive again.
-
BTW, Rossi has just named ABB as his equipment supplier/partner for setting up a factory.
-
The most important thing that MFMP can do now is to repeat the experiment with an identical reactor and fuel. This would prove that following the recipe does lead at least to production of the same high energy emissions.
I agree with you 100x. This is the most important thing to do and no time should be wasted now.
-
No, not to convince skeptics (They are useless people :D)
Calorimetry is recommended to convince ourselves that there is no instrument error or measurement error. It is like a cross confirmation. -
@s_grey
Now that you have a working reactor, are you planning to do proper calorimetry? -
I guess the purple trace is showing a drop in power to maintain same temperature?
What are the bumps (circled)? -
I performed Parkhomov replications seven times without observing any excess. I quit doing these experiments because I believe Parkhomov made mistakes and Rossi is just lying.
With all respect, your statement means nothing if no one knows whats and hows of your experiments. Please post the details. It will be beneficial to all replicators.
-
Good to hear some update from you after a long time.
I think if Rossi used radioactive substances, he would have declared it in patent. (Else the patent is of no use).
I'm now leaning towards some kind of EM pulses being the missing ingredient. Lets hope people try those in their coming experiments. -
Now, suddenly the Orbo is said not be supplying power forever but just for an extended time. *lol*
What is the source of this statement ?
-
You are doing a great work. Keep it up.