everything is explained there.
hen carefully read my article
RotM was not explained...
everything is explained there.
hen carefully read my article
RotM was not explained...
3) rotM= -∂E/∂t,
4) rotE=j+1/c2∙∂M/∂t, ???...
Our World is absolutely non-mechanical!
Please fill in the gaps..
Handwaving does not explain"RotM" or"everything"
everything is explained there.
not quite everything...
3) rotM= -∂E/∂t,
4) rotE=j+1/c2∙∂M/∂t, ???...
from Google
"
About 0 results (0.17 seconds)
Did you mean: rotMG= -∂E/∂t,
No results containing all your search terms were found.
Your search - rotM= -∂E/∂t, - did not match any documents..."
anything to do with Rodriguez?
Rodrigues' rotation formula - Wikipedia
3D...4D 6D framework?
There are hundreds more references
Bubble bubble toil and trouble... Shakespeare
"
Let sea-discoverers to new worlds have gone;
Let maps to other, worlds on worlds have shown;" Donne
There is not much gap between the speculation of theoretical physicists and metaphysicists
However the latter is more lyrical
China's nuclear is safe .....until it isn't
"Lu Tiezhong, a member of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), told the Global Times in an exclusive interview that China's nuclear power units have a world-leading safety record
I ran across a post from Bob Greenyer
Did you run across a post where Bob Greenyer stated what Axilself stated about the population of "EVO tracts"?
Bob Greenyer assayed the population of EVO tracts within an small but representative area of a sample of the two foot diameter sphere that had been given to him for analysis and projected the number of EVOs from that number. Bob came up with an estimate of a quarter quadrillion EVOs indicated in that calculation.
sustainable, non harmful technology!
Florian Metzler persevering with Fe57..
Tantulum 180.. nuclear excitation for batteries
he4 + 22Mev >> metastable deuterium????
theoretical paper in preparation with a Hamiltonian
whoopee
le nouveau CEO.
Vive le CEO et la presidente
to pass off this devilry EVO as science?
Perhaps your science needs its own thread
Why create trillions of new entities EVO when neutrinos have not yet been dealt wit
Neutrinos are a lesser devil..perhaps you need to create a separate cell for them..
Roberto Oros di Bartini
At least he wrote stuff down.. rather than handwaved
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26408302_Relations_Between_Physical_Constants
You should work with Bob directly to come to mutual agreement
You should not misquote Bob..Malcolm with your Axilsay...
"reminiscent of EVOS????"
transmutes to "Bob Greenyer assayed the population of EVO tract"
so I take this info as coming from Bob himself
In truth this info comes from Axilself
The objective of these discussion points
Rather than Axil hearsay I'd like to see Bob's writing
"the number of EVOs"
Less Axilsay transmutation of youtube words would be useful...
The scrip for this video was approved for publication by Bob
Rather than Axil hearsay I'd like to see Bob's writing
"the number of EVOs"
with all assumptions stated.
sorry I.m not ingenuous enough to accept that
"reminiscent of EVOs" TM 9.29
is really "the number of EVOs"..
Let them who have ears...hear Matthew 11.15
Bob came up with an estimate of a quarter quadrillion EVOs indicated in that calculation.
Unfortunately a calculation based on a whole lot of handwaving assumptions
Maybe sufficient for the ingenuous
but I'd like something like
his verifiable Radiacode measurements of thorium
TM 1.31.14
As time marches on, ingenuous people will learn how to turn the EVO to task,
Count me out ,sorry,
I'm not ingenuous enough to believe in trillions of EVOs...
2011 Blog
Open Access Scientific Publishing
Engelen is not critical of the status quo in nuclear physics
a decaying status quo ..
The future of nuclear energy is not in fission or ITER but in LENR
"And no CO2 emissions. Germany has decided to close its nuclear power plants. That is a remarkable decision that the government seems to have taken overnight. The phasing out of nuclear power stations will lead to a disappearing need for technical and scientific knowledge in the field of nuclear energy. There will be no more technical and scientific innovation in this area. In Germany."
Jos Engelen i very critical of everything,
Above a few watts to up to 10 watts of power production:
..sounds like handwaving to me
surely your reactor has a certain volume
if you scaled it up 100x then a few W would become kW
perhaps you need to incorporate energy density as an ingredient in your polari BosenEVO-false vacuum word salad?
power production of the reactor under 10 watts
that's not much of a detail..
tell us more of the detail of your 'appropriate' reactor design, Axil
Length width height mass material energy input etc