Posts by RobertBryant

Quote from Frogfall

..does not exist.

not on an industrial scale... but Clean Planet, Celani, Huang etc are working on improving the lab scale production of LENR xs heat,,,

I am sure SAFIRE developers are aware

Quote from Cydonia

Agree that nothing travel at speed of light

I think Wyttenbach is saying is that the EM flux creates ;mass; in electrons ,, and protons

as it bends on a femtometer or less radius (in 3D,, 4D.....

Of course EM flux does travel at the speed of light

as does AC in a wire

but not the particles themselves

Quote from Curbina

fracking water remediation,

fracking water is from fossil fuel technology...

LENR is of course a competitor for fracking.

in the shortterm LENR energy production is contrary to SAFIRE development

Quote from Wyttenbach

a multiple of Gigabytes typically N*10E40 Bit. This amount is stored in less than 1 ccm volume. Now you can do some calculations for today's technology...

maybe computer scientists like Erlich understand information a tad better..

100 petabytes of data per gram of DNA..

ironically.. DNA appears to have arisen from white noise..according to the conventional narrative

https://www.science.org/content/article/dna-could-store-all-worlds-data-one-room

Quote from axil

Leonard Susskind

His first love ,one of them, was QCD .

.but its grown old ... fifty years

50 years and QCD still cannot model the 250 or so stable atomic nuclei

but its amazing how Susskind can make a story...

Update for 2023-24

by Paul Raybould | Nov 20, 2023 | Blog_post

The optical-power emission-type SunCell® was operated under conditions permissive of molecular hydrino absorption in nickel foil and metallic tin. Raman anti-Stokes and Stokes spectra confirmed the prior spectral assignments of emission lines of higher energy than...

"Suncell excess heat is due to H2(1/4) formation.."

What happened to the myriad of other hydrinos &dihydrinos

that Mills postulates in GUTCP?

H&H2(1/2..1/8........1/137)?

Mills using nickel... maybe he reads the latest LENR results..Celani, Clean Power, Takahashi?

or even Wyttenbach:)

Quote from Curbina

“belong to commercial entities”.

that would disqualify a lot of scientific research..

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359431116341175

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan,

Professor Huang and his wide circle of contacts would be just as baffled

"The authors are grateful to Prof. Y. Maydanik (Russia), Prof. H.F. Smirnov (Ukraine), Dr. K.A. Goncharov (Russia), Prof. V.M. Kiseev (Russia), Prof. L.L. Vasiliev (Belarus), Prof. J.C. Hou (China), Dr. J. Ku (USA),"

#

Conclusion

Loop heat pipe is thought as an expensive heat transfer device only used in aerospace. We have shown that using a novel evaporator design associated with simple manufacturing process, the cost can be brought down dramatically for commercial applications. The cost of a 100 W LHP less than 20 USD in mass production is achieved in the present study.

Quote from Shane D.

will be a bit of redemption

Maybe not... some character flaws need more repair..

Rusi Taleyarkhan at Purdue University - West Lafayette | Rate My Professors

Rusi Taleyarkhan is a professor in the Nuclear Engineering department at Purdue University - West Lafayette - see what their students are saying about them or…

www.ratemyprofessors.com

as said in the presentation,,

Too good to be true..TM 4.22

Hopefully they can get enough finance to do more thorough isotope analysis... mass balances..etc

definitely impressive team assembly communication work from Professor Huang

He's not just an engineer

Quote from Curbina

H2O17 was confirmed by MS so there’s no

oxygen has a number of isotopes..some H2017 should be present naturally

I think they are comparing the O17 to O16 ratios somehow

Also there is HDO..

2D+O18 =Ne22??? another possibility?

Quote from Steven-B-Krivit

Please see Widom's response at

TM 5.13 ..Widom said he responded to the 2013 paper but Hagelstein was not satisfied with his response.

I guess the blue matters were not 'clarified'...

Steven.. I noted that Peter Hagelstein,MIT may not been at Szczecin for your presentation about the WL model?

As you noted Hagelstein wrote in 2013..

" This model is the single most successful theoretical model that the field has seen since it started;"

but there was a lot more written.. 22 pages..

it has served as the theoretical justification for a program at NASA; ...

The first step in the model involves the proposed accumulation of mass by electrons through Coulomb interactions with electrons and ions in highly-excited coupled plasmon and optical phonon modes.

Historically for us this mass increase has been hard to understand, so we were motivated in this study to understand better how this comes about. To study it, we consider simple

classical models which show the effect, from which we see that the mass increase can be associated with the electron kinetic energy.The basic results of the simple classical model carry over to the quantum problem in the case of simple wave packet solutions. Since there are no quantum fluctuations of the longitudinal field in the Coulomb gauge, the resulting problem is conventional, and

we find no reason to expect MeV electron kinetic energy in a conventional consideration of electrons in metals.

We consider the numerical example outlined in a primer on the Widom–Larsen model,

and find that multiple GW/cm2 would be required to support

the level of vibrational excitation assumed in the surface layer;

this very large power per unit area falls short by orders of magnitude the power level needed to make up the expected energy loss of the mass-enhanced electrons.

We note that the mass enhancement of an electron in a transverse field is connected to acceleration, so that the electron radiates.A similar effect is expected in the longitudinal case, and

a very large amount of easily detected X-ray radiation would be expected if an MeV-level mass enhancement were present even in a modest number of electrons.

At the end of his detailed paper Hagelstein wrote..

Presumably Widom and Larsen will clarify things in their future publications.

I was wondering if Widom and Larsen did " clarify things" ,especially the matters highlighted in blue..

https://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol12.pdf

P.L. Hagelstein / JCMNS12 (2013) 18–40

Quote from axil

LENR force

10 on the EVO scale... May the LENR force be with all of us....always

HNY

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

gibberish

EVO..=

. Entertainment Value Only

maybe there is an EVO scale...1-10

EVO - Definition by AcronymFinder

Exploding capillary wires ...A lot hotter than LENR

Quote from Ahlfors

L’EXPLOSION DE FILS CONTENANT DU DEUTÉRIUM"

L’activité initiale due au 56Mn correspond, d’après les calibrations,

à une émission de 3,5 ± 1.55.10⁷ neutrons pour les 33 explosions de fils de tantale deutérés,

soit donc au moins 10⁶ neutrons quand il s’est trouvé qu’un fil explose avec production de neutrons.

􀁹 􀀅 􀀎 􀅢 􀀠 􀀈 􀀈 􀀍􀀒􀀃􀅢 􀀠􀅢 􀀈 􀀋 􀀆􀀃􀀃􀀗 􀀇􀀗􀀙􀅢 􀀒􀀃􀀋􀀚􀀠􀀗 􀀇 􀀈 􀀒 􀅢 􀀪 􀀇 􀁣 􀀃 􀀲 􀅢 􀀜 􀀎􀀵􀀃􀀆 􀀇 􀀗 􀀙 􀅢 􀀎 􀀘 􀅢 􀀅􀀚􀀃􀅢

􀀨 􀀠 􀀆 􀀆 􀀇 􀀃 􀀆 􀅢 􀀘 􀀎 􀀜 􀀜 􀀎􀀵 􀀃 􀀑 􀅢 􀀨􀀛􀅢 􀀅 􀀍 􀀗 􀀗 􀀃 􀀜 􀀇 􀀗 􀀙 􀀶 􀅢 􀀅 􀀇 􀀃 􀀑 􀅢 􀀅 􀀎 􀅢 􀀃 􀀜 􀀃 􀀋 􀀅 􀀆 􀀎 􀀗 􀅢

Quote from Ahlfors

ELECTRICALEXPLOSION OF DEUTERATED LIQUIDS OF METALLIC CONDUCTIVITY"

U. FISCHER, H. JAGER and W. LOCHTE-HOLTGREVEN

"This zone is situated in the outer zones of the sun, just below the zone of general (hydrogen) turbulence i.e. about 30 000 km below the surface. There, the temperature is 2.4- 10⁶K or 206 eV only. The temperature obtained with exploding wires is surprisingly near to this value. This again indicates the importance of further experimental work.􀀋􀀎􀀗􀀋 􀀃􀀗􀀅 􀀆􀀠􀀅 􀀇􀀎􀀗􀀈 􀁯􀅢 􀀠􀅢 􀀔􀀆􀀎􀀋􀀃 􀀈 􀀈 􀅢 􀀑 􀀇 􀀈 􀀋 􀀍 􀀈 􀀈 􀀃 􀀑 􀅢 􀀨 􀀛 􀅢 􀀒􀀠􀀗 􀀛 􀅢 􀀔􀀠􀀆􀀅 􀀇 􀀋 􀀇􀀔􀀠􀀗􀀅 􀀈􀅢

􀀚􀀃􀀆􀀃􀅢 􀀪 􀀠 􀀜 􀀈 􀀎 􀅢 􀀈 􀀍􀀔􀀔􀀎􀀆􀀅􀀃􀀑􀅢 􀀨􀀛􀅢 􀁕􀀠􀀒􀀨􀀠􀀍􀀅􀅢 􀀠􀀗􀀑􀅢 􀀒􀀛􀀈 􀀃 􀀜 􀀘 􀂎 􀂚 􀁪 􀀶 􀁤 􀅢

􀁑 􀀎 􀀆 􀅢 􀀜 􀀠 􀀋 􀄙 􀅢 􀀎 􀀘 􀅢 􀀈 􀀔 􀀠 􀀋􀀃􀅢 􀀠􀀗􀀑􀅢 􀀅 􀀇􀀒􀀃􀅢 􀁱􀅢 􀀵 􀀇 􀀜 􀀜 􀅢 􀀗􀀎􀀅􀅢

Quote from axil

As Ken Shoulders asserts, the LENR reaction is produced by EVOs

Quote from RobertBryant

Has Axil any evidence of the non ubiquitous EVO in electrolytic LENR..

since the dubious 1996 stuff by Shoulders

or for that matter in any of the current alloy powder LENR work

done by Takahashi/Celani/Clean Planet et al

An assertion is not evidence..

Quote from axil

Sample contamination is the declaimer that is almost always used to discredit transmutation activity via the LENR reaction.

John Dash presented evidence for transmutation in 2007

and as I recall presented quite a lot of evidence for LENR over the years..

Rather than the idea of Dash discrediting LENR... which Axil seems to be intimating

I would suggest that in lab work subsequent to 1996, Dash discovered that

during foil preparation on rollers... there was a strong possibility of contamination

... at least in the Dash samples that Shoulders used.

Possibly the presence of gallium and gold are signs
of contamination???

"An X-ray microanalysis of almost any area of the surface that has not been subject to a disruptive process is shown in Fig. 8 and is basically pure palladium. On the other hand, an X-ray microanalysis of a typical fractured region, like that shown in Fig. 6, is shown in Fig. 9 and depicts quantities of Mg, Ca, Si, Ga and Au, along with the base Pd signature.

Dash possibly adjusted his foil preparation technique after this..

Dash,J.andD.S.Silver.SurfaceStudiesAfterLoadingMetalsWithHydrogenAnd/Or Deuterium.inThe13thInternationalConferenceonCondensedMatterNuclearScience. 2007.Sochi,Russia.

Quote from axil

does not make the statement more meaningful.

Quote from RobertBryant

the sketchy evidence for electrolytic LENR EVO was requested to be

withdrawn by Dash...

but Shoulders retained it

He did not comply with Dash's request..

And does not make it any more less true..

I actually thought it noteworthy to add that

. Dash requested the data withdrawn,, but to my reading

Shoulders did not withdraw it...

..

Has Axil any evidence of the non ubiquitous EVO in electrolytic LENR..

since the dubious 1996 stuff by Shoulders

or for that matter in any of the current alloy powder LENR work

done by Takahashi/Celani/Clean Planet et al

which is more than quantum handwaves?

Vigier,,1992

The attempt to find some common theoretical explanation

for electrolytic LENR and capillary fusion was ambitious..

..perhaps by an inexperienced horseman...

The extreme conditions of capillary fusion as done

by Lochteholtgreven et al

have little in common with electrolysis

"

􀁕 􀁲 􀊀 􀀝 􀀑􀀂􀀝􀊀 􀀃 􀀅 􀀄 􀊀 􀀑􀀂􀀆􀊀 􀀇􀀄􀀎􀀃􀀅 􀀆􀀝 􀀉􀀂􀀝􀀄􀀇􀊀 􀀝 􀀑􀀄􀊀 􀁟 􀁊 􀀄 􀀏 􀀆 􀀈 􀀑􀀎􀀂􀀅􀀅􀃧 􀁏􀀃􀀅􀀆􀊀 􀀈 􀁊 􀀂 􀀏 􀀎 􀊀

􀀝 􀀑 􀀂􀀝􀊀 􀀝 􀀑 􀀄 􀀉 􀀄􀊀 􀀄 􀀶 􀀏 􀀆 􀀝 􀀆􀊀 􀀂􀊀 􀀆 􀀏 􀀰􀀅 􀀏 􀀲 􀀏 􀀈 􀀂􀀅􀀝 􀀮 􀁃 􀊀 􀂃 􀀅 􀀃􀀨􀊀 􀀉􀀄􀀍 􀀉􀀃􀀇􀀗􀀈􀀝 􀀏􀀕 􀁊 􀀄 􀁝􀊀

􀀄 􀀶􀀈􀀄 􀀆 􀀆 􀊀 􀀑􀀄􀀂􀀝􀊀 􀂃 􀀂􀀕􀀃􀁍􀀄􀊀 􀀕􀀉􀀄􀀂􀁒􀁤􀀄􀁍􀀄􀀅 􀁝􀊀

􀁃 􀁆 􀅠 􀀏 􀀅 􀊀 􀀄 􀀮 􀀄 􀀈􀀝 􀀉 􀀃 􀀮 􀁃􀀝 􀀏 􀀈 􀊀 􀀑􀀄􀀂􀁍􀁃􀊀 􀀨􀀂􀀝 􀀄 􀀉 􀊀 􀀍􀀑􀀄 􀀅􀀃􀀎􀀄􀀅 􀀂 􀊀 􀂃 􀀆 􀀄 􀀄 􀊀 􀀝 􀀑􀀄 􀀏 􀀉 􀊀 􀀅􀀄􀀨􀊀

􀀄 􀀶􀀍􀀄􀀉 􀀏􀀎􀀄􀀅􀀝 􀁲􀊀

􀀋􀀎􀀗􀀋 􀀃􀀗􀀅 􀀆􀀠􀀅 􀀇􀀎􀀗􀀈 􀁯􀅢 􀀠􀅢 􀀔􀀆􀀎􀀋􀀃 􀀈 􀀈 􀅢 􀀑 􀀇 􀀈 􀀋 􀀍 􀀈 􀀈 􀀃 􀀑 􀅢 􀀨 􀀛 􀅢 􀀒􀀠􀀗 􀀛 􀅢 􀀔􀀠􀀆􀀅 􀀇 􀀋 􀀇􀀔􀀠􀀗􀀅 􀀈􀅢

􀀚􀀃􀀆􀀃􀅢 􀀪 􀀠 􀀜 􀀈 􀀎 􀅢 􀀈 􀀍􀀔􀀔􀀎􀀆􀀅􀀃􀀑􀅢 􀀨􀀛􀅢 􀁕􀀠􀀒􀀨􀀠􀀍􀀅􀅢 􀀠􀀗􀀑􀅢 􀀒􀀛􀀈 􀀃 􀀜 􀀘 􀂎 􀂚 􀁪 􀀶 􀁤 􀅢

􀁑 􀀎 􀀆 􀅢 􀀜 􀀠 􀀋 􀄙 􀅢 􀀎 􀀘 􀅢 􀀈 􀀔 􀀠 􀀋􀀃􀅢 􀀠􀀗􀀑􀅢 􀀅 􀀇􀀒􀀃􀅢 􀁱􀅢 􀀵 􀀇 􀀜 􀀜 􀅢 􀀗􀀎􀀅􀅢

Axil"He believed that EVO's were not only relevant but responsible for LENR"

Belief is not science

the sketchy evidence for electrolytic LENR EVO was requested to be

withdrawn by Dash...

but Shoulders retained it

He did not comply with Dash's request..but stuck with his belief

Shoulder's did zero work on electrolytic LENR

""Note entered 2/19/03 John Dash has requested the removal of data relating to his work on the grounds that his samples were likely contaminated during a metallurgical rolling process thus weakening the claims of transmutation. Although adequate warning of such an effect is included in this paper, the authors gladly comply with the request of John Dash and leave the data intact but add this additional warning as to the interpretation of the data. John Dash is not to be held responsible for any data presented.