It's not my intention to chase JR. And, above all, what happened to the readings of the Yokogawa analyser?
No comment. Apologies to Caravaggio.
RobertBryant
Member
- Male
- 68
- from Sydney,Australia
- Member since May 10th 2015
- Last Activity:
Posts by RobertBryant
-
-
Anyway, good to know NOW that the values reported in the "Input power" column of both the active and control spreadsheets are compatible with the V*I product
I personally consider this case closed!
Case closed?
Can we move on with
outprejudice? -
This is pretty good. Just calculate the volume and the temperature needed to make the evaporated/ejected mass fluid/molten.
The large number of coordinated d-ds needed to melt a micron box is probably less than 600 my calcs
based on 22 Mevs per D-D fusion
Still quite big for a Skype conference.
Maybe there is new Googleflux app for communication over 0.1 microns....? for atomic users?
My contribution for Ruby's cartoon opus.
Blastoff time..should be Meltdown time.
May the flux be with us.. most times
-
In the calibration data posted on the forum, U and I are rounded to two decimals e.g. 67.68 and 1.77.
For the calibration data
The blower 0.007 and heater 0.002 discrepancies are within the expected range of
0.007+/-.0013 and 0,0018+-0.0003 which might be expected from a truncation that causes
0.0025 average deviation in the V and I readings.
The standard deviation is approximated from 195 throws of a 5 sided die.
The calibration p values have not been pasted.
Ascoli65 is without excuse .
-
creator of ad-hoc theories
Axilian ad hoc and post hoc eurekas for any phenomena ..
some conflicting..some plausible some implausible
Random cut and paste is so serendipitous
-
EVO hopping along and where it touches the surface it disintegrates matter
Axil .. you appear to have connected Fredericks dots to make an NAE move... novel.... bravo.
-
Here is another SEM micrograph that shows a mobile NAE moving across a copper oxide surface making holes in that substrate as it hops along,
I could not see the mobile NAE moving..
Maybe modern SEMs can do videos,, but not the ones I knew.
-
The crater you see of micrometer size only happens if a large collective of D-D reactions "blows up" at the same time
I calculate ~1000,000 D-D fusions to vaporise a micron hole..maybe I made a mistake?
Perhaps the 1000,000 D-Ds have a consensus on Skype before deciding on the blow up..?
-
sound like machine generated nonsense
Unfortunately it is not machine but human generated . not an experimental physicist though
"Those QBists who find this approach promising are pursuing a complete reconstruction of quantum theory featuring the urgleichung as the key postulate"
-
"
socio-physics or what?
post-modernism physics
QBism
"All probabilities, including those equal to zero or one, are valuations that an agent ascribes to his or her degrees of belief in possible outcomes. As they define and update probabilities, quantum states (density operators), channels (completely positive trace-preserving maps), and measurements (positive operator-valued measures) are also the personal judgements of an agent.
-
That's why I think a micro chip approach makes solid state LENR valid
I think that Dimeter Alexandrov is doing a micro approach with differential calorimetry DST
-
only difference between the active and the calibration reactors is the processing of nickel, it was implicit that the active and calibration runs differ
No it is not implicit.
X Does not imply (Y+X)
Reactor does not imply ( heater + reactor)
The heater being internal or external makes little difference to what the RTDs see as delta T. at the blower exit.
-
will ignore the many requests to provide a plausible explanation
Ascoli65 ignores the probable truncation error occurring in both the blower and Heater V*I.
Ascoli65 cannot and will not acknowledge that this is consistent
with the much larger discrepancy seen in the 5W blower readings as compared to the 120W heater
The blower 0.007 and heater 0.002 discrepancies are within the expected range of
0.007+/-.0013 and 0,0018+-0.0003 which might be expected from a truncation that causes
0.0025 average deviation in the V and I readings
Ascoli65 is without excuse .
-
if the authors of the original test deleted the more reliable data recorded during the original tests?
Ascolian assertion,
"authors of the original test deleted the more reliable data"
Neither Jed nor Mizuno deleted any data,,, Jed , the author. has repeatedly said that..
but Ascoli asserts to the contrary,,, inventing fantastic scenarios... contrary to the truth.
Perhaps Jed has more productive things to deal with than Ascolian assertions,, in Sapporo and Georgia
-
Don't be surprised. RB is acting as any rational supporter of LENR should react to our analysis in accordance to the "cardinal rule
Don't be surprised that Ascoli65 won't even consider the simplest and most probable
explanation of truncation error in the data transfer from Mizuno's original
spreadsheet _data logs into Jed's google sheet
because this is consistent with his irrational, dystopian view of ALL LENR research and researchers
The truth is that ten days ago Ascoli65 did not(and will not) consider the blower data ... or the probability of a simple truncation error
preferring instead to develop a fantastic scenario involving hiding and possible deception on Mizuno's part,based on a select part of the data,
For those with an open mind,, the google spreadsheet is available below..
This spreadsheet was a messy ad hoc 2017 effort to check the heat output of
the calibration Mizuno reactor on a google sheet and to simplify the unwieldy original data Jed did quite a bit..
including truncating the V and I columns.. among others.. and did not transfer formulas across for the most part.
preferring to write them again on the google sheet,
.Even so the thing is still unwieldy .. caution... it slows down/locks up IE
There was more data on the original spreadsheet plus datalog.... hopefully Jed still has them..
It would be of interest to look at the reactor temperatures
However this 2017 data will likely be made redundant by updated spreadsheets / reactors.
-
Perhaps THHnew can provide another fantastic explanation
Perhaps Ascoli65 can report whether he actually looked
at all the data ...the heater plus the blower and all the possibilities
and considered the probability of a simple truncation error ten or so days ago?
Well perhaps not... Ascoli65 declined..to do so Buona notte.
-
can anyone other than RB understand how his point relates to the heater issue
Obviously THHnew purports he cannot. understand why the blower and the heater are linkedThe discrepancy with the heater is instead explained by a fantastic Ascolian scenario involving deception and hiding
where Mizuno is supposed to have pasted in the heater VxI results
THHnew cannot acknowledge that the discrepancy in both the blower and the heater
is most likely due to a simple truncation error.
Instead he says this is NOISE.. and "has not made a logical point"
Why would Mizuno or Jed bother to paste in the 5W blower VxI results.. when its just easy to measure
The 3-4x higher discrepancy with the 5W blower is consistent with truncation error..
Perhaps THHnew can provide another fantastic explanation.
-
The obvious interpretation of the data
Ascoli has neglected to consider a simple truncation error.in the heater data. and so has THHnew.
They have both failed to look at the blower data as well.
They will not even believe Jed when he shows them the original Mizuno untruncated data..
but prefer to further promulgate their foolish scenario.
-
There is one peak at .015 Hz (66 seconds)
Frequency analysis.. my compliments!
AN LENR explanation of the 66 second peaks
assuming the energy comes out over a smooth hill profile
and assuming that the energy from one D-D fusion is 22 Mev;s
is that one peak represents the coordinated fusion of ~10 (12) deuterium molecules..
-
Best: Mills team finds a path to LENR.... (finally..)
Maybe if Mills sticks 50 grams of nickel mesh burnished with palladium into his 'hydrino' reactor
he can get a few extra megajoules..
each H-H ...instead of 495eV can then generate >1,000,000 eV
