I personally think that all LENR researchers have a moral duty to share their know how
to all and sundry?
or to those skilled in the art?
Are you skilled in the art??
I personally think that all LENR researchers have a moral duty to share their know how
to all and sundry?
or to those skilled in the art?
Are you skilled in the art??
I personally think that all LENR researchers have a moral duty to share their know how
Would you include Goodenough in this...because he has not shared his knowhow
a patent äpplication does not equal knowhow
According to a part of the doctrine, the know-how is the instrument safeguarding the practical knowledge integrating and accompanying the patent. Patenting represents an arrival point for research only after tests, analysis, investigation with results that may fall into the definition of secret information. Therefore, a patent application could exclude data, information and details that could excessively limit the patent’s sphere of protection from the claims and from the drawings related to the invention. These data and pieces of information could be kept secret and act an important role in realizing the invention.
Otherwise China would be making Goodenough batteries right now.. or lithium rotators.
There is no knowhow in this patent
If the reaction had enough energy to self-sustain then that reaction would have been recreated the world over, by multitudes of physicists.
Whether or not Rossi's Ni to Cu transmutation is true,,
"multitudes of physicists" are not doing LENR..
Multitudes of transmutations have been observed under "low energy" conditions by the physicists and chemists doing LENR
example- Srinivasan et al.. BARC protium, deuterium to tritium.
https://www.google.com/url?q=h…Vaw1ZgQRCB6bdZB6pTJH4TOCW
Srinivasan is not short of neurons AFAIK
they brought in an outside consultant
Somewhere in California
Robert Godes : "Welcome guys...So I'm interested in your expert analysis of our measurement technique"
THHuxleynew: "If you have errors, and they are not properly diagnosed, you'd expect "optimisation of error" to lead to graphs such as you have."
SOT: "How did we get from 300 watts in generating 30kW out "actual power gain" and "stable" and "the answer is YES" from Godes"
Robert Godes ""
there is actually a lot of information in there
This information has been obtained at a cost.
This cost should not be taken lightly
People still have to put bread on the table
and their time is limited unlike atomic time.
Anyone competent out there who can help
Wyttenbach with
putting info on the table?
Of course for those who eat the Standard Model
this stuff is unpalatable.
I was just looking at all the gamma states for Pd102.
wow! there are over 140
That's just one isotopes. how many isotopes are
there from Silicon to Palladium?
a year from now when neither Brillouin nor BLP have made clearly verifiable progress
A year from now is 16/02/2020
Will SOT's prophecy pan out?
Will SOT reincarnate into another avatar ?
Perhaps there are no more important questions in the universe?
If an LENR project is open source at the start it should stay open source
MFMP talked open source.
Open source is (was) trendy in software.
but many who do (did) open source software
have (had) alternative means for food and shelter...
but recently IT salaries are not so generous
LENR research and D costs so much more than software development
It is not just time on a keyboard.
Which LENR project is open source now??
food and shelter
Of course if I ate wild boar, mushrooms and reindeer I might consider buying a gamma toy.
Sorry its offtopic but bionerd23 is so interesting
aha.
SOT and THHuxley electrical consultants for Brillouin
experience...
I once worked on a project several decades ago
The combination of skills required is a pretty rare mix in my experience
I guess my falling asleep watching this video doesn't qualify me.
.
I have a feeling that such a gamma toy won't pick out the soft gammas of LENR.
Maybe I will save the $2000 entry level deposit for ..food and shelter?
"
$50 every time somebody uses the coffee machine,
Good News
6 biilion euro signed off on... for ITER coffee machine..2021-20??
https://www.euractiv.com/secti…a-nuclear-fusion-project/
C'est dommage
No one listened to Michele Rivasi.. French Greens
"the budget explodes, according to a US study worth 65 billion euros.
This project is a financial gulf and a scientific chimera.
Let's get out of this Promethean dream.
The urgency is in the control of energy and the development of renewable energies.
especially if you have one or more volunteers
Is Director volunteering to get off his director's chair?
but not clear checking of the (electrical) issues I've outlined above.
Maybe SRI needs to engage THHuxleynew as an electrical consultant
Perhaps Robert Godes is just a jumpedup 'sparkie"
and has no idea about measuring high frequency pulses error due to
RFI rectification on TCs
Such a new and unknown area of physics needs special expertise
if it's real.
https://brillouinenergy.com/test-results
Brillouin is real.
unlike SOT.. which is a shabby unreality
Brillouin needs to try out other configurations
Have you got any director's cues for Godes?
It simply doesn’t work
Brillouin COP 2.37 indicates work..... quite a few years of it.
SOTs comments indicate BS.................'quite a few years of it
The so claimed Higgs boson is an exact (= all measured digits and easy to predict...) resonance of the proton magnetic mass
Peter Higgs "You mean the Higg's boson is Ernest's pröton after all""
Rutherford ""Of all created comforts, God is the lender; you are the borrower, not the owner.""
Peter ""Ï never wanted to own it anyway"
Rutherford "Neither did I""
I wouldn't give any physicist more than a few dollars
I wouldn't give a lira for anselmi's speculation
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.02600
The Higg's boson is a fakeon.. Is this physicist for real?
I do not see any indication that with a commercial version of this the energy overhead would be extremely high,
Marakhtanovs' wrote
In experiments with the target-trap, a Bismuth projectile was examined.
The thermal energy measured in the target was 1.81 times greater than the kinetic energy of the projectile.
The mass of the projectile is 0.0245 kg, diameter is 14.2 mm, and the velocity is 1183 ± 20 m /s.
Neglecting air friction and oxidation
COP=1.81?,2.81?