Ivermectin Meta-analysis.. 30 studies

https://ivmmeta.com/

Quote from Wyttenbach

50% of those aged 18 – 55 in Pfizer’s trial had adverse events

No efficacy data on the octogenarians... the most at risk group..except for the 90+

what % of the 18-55 are at risk of death from Covid19..

where are the extrapolations for efficacy? to 80+ 90+?

Quote from JedRothwell

They publish everything, eventually. It may take some time to come through review.

Here is the latest on Remdesivir.. Nov 3..

read the Gilead share price to see how it is going in the field. WHO dropped it..

My guess is that Gilead will never publish the mortality data

"

"Limitations

• The study was conducted in patients with a wide range of disease severity. The study was not powered to detect differences within subgroups.
• The study was powered to detect differences in clinical improvement, not mortality.***
• No data were collected on longer-term morbidity.

Interpretation

In patients with severe COVID-19, remdesivir reduced the time to clinical recovery. The benefit of remdesivir was most apparent in hospitalized patients who only required supplemental oxygen. There was no observed benefit of remdesivir in those who were on high-flow oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, or ECMO, but the study was not powered to detect differences within subgroups. There was no observed benefit of remdesivir in patients with mild or moderate COVID-19, but the number of participants in these categories was relatively small."

*****In fact the endpoints were switched to overlook poor mortality results... which have been seen subsequently in the wider world..

https://www.covid19treatmentgu…linical-data--remdesivir/

Quote from JedRothwell

I think that gagging them because you disagree with them would be unreasonable.

Who am I to gag the FDA? rhetoric?

Distrust... 100%

'Young women, migrants and Indigenous Australians will be given the hard sell on the coronavirus vaccine when the government rolls out its $24 million advertising campaign within weeks."

https://www.smh.com.au/politic…ears-20210109-p56svi.html

rather than a 'campaign'

I would just like to see the full vaccine data..effectiveness versus damage ..age group by age group.. I

don't think it would cost $24 million

also the projected lives saved

also the full data for ivermectin that Dr Tess Laurie reviewed

Thanks Rends

Here is a transcript for those who prefer text rahter than audio

Perhaps Ivermectin will be OK for those in the poor countries

orr those in the the rich countries who selfinfect with scabies..

and the vaciine will be a pricey wing and a prayer for the rich countries

this is a letter for Mr Johnson

‘Dear prime minister my name is dr tess laurie and i'm the director of the

evidence-based medicine consultancy in Bath {U.K}

my business conducts industryindependent medical evidence synthesis

to support international clinical practice guidelines

my biggest clients are the NHS and the WHO

i have recently authored a report called

ivermectin for preventing and treating covid19

a rapid review to validate the frontline Covid 19 critical care alliance's conclusions

in connection with its findings i sent an urgent correspondence to mr hancock

and other members of parliament on

monday the 3rd of january

unfortunately i have not yet had a reply

and due to the urgent implications of the report i'm trying to reach you via this video

the good news is that we now have solidevidence of an effective treatment for Covid 19

it is called ivemecttin

ivermectin is a very safe and effective anti-parasitic medication

widely used in low and middle income countries to treat worms lice and scabies in both adults and children

it has been around for decades and not only is it on the WHO’'s list of essential medicines

it is a Nobel prize-winning medicine due to its increasing usefulness across a

range of different illnesses between christmas and new year

I independently reviewed 27 studies presented by the frontline covid 19 critical care alliance

as evidence of admittance effectiveness

the resulting evidence is consistent and unequivoca

ivermectin works well both in preventing covid infections

and in preventing deaths at this at the same doses

used to treat lice and other parasiticinfections

i am very pleased to inform you that

this evidence solidly substantiates the

flcc's recommendation

that ivamectin should be adopted globally and systematically

for the prevention and treatment of covid 19.

because i know there is a lot of fake news going about i would like to assure you

that you can trust the integrity of myreport

because i am an experienced independent

medical research consultant

whose work is routinely used to underpin international clinical practice guidelines

in addition i have no conflict of interest and have received no funding for this report

but most of all you can trust me because i am also a medical doctor

first and foremost with a moral duty to help people

to do no harm and to save lives

please may we start saving lives now

I thank you very much for your help

Mr hancock's office should have my details

Quote from Roseland67

these new Covid-19 drugs

which new drugs..I guess you mean the vaccines..

Ivermectin is an old drug..

the socalled vaccines .. we don't have all the data that Pfizer has

Pfizer is unlikely to be transparent... they of course have a conflict of interest with full transparency..

do I trust Pfizer ... no... only the raw data .. but that won't be forthcoming.

Quote from JedRothwell

What would you want the FDA to do? Keep quiet and publish no negative opinion, even when their data shows the drug does not work?

I'd like the FDA or any government org.. to publish the full postiive data for the experimental Covid vaccines.. if available

for example the effectiveness of the vaccine in the octogenarian age group

When Jed says 'even when their data says the drug doesn't work

he is fudging ... which drug Jed??? ivermectin?? be specific please.. Remdesivir?

Quote from Ahlfors

for stable generation of intensive cold neutron flux.

Interesting

"

Probably, these results could be explained by the suggestion about appearance of neutron-like particles in our experiment

(but not real neutrons). Figure 9

Quote from zorud

: There is probably no other vaccine out there for similar dangerous illnesses

but there is ivermectin.. and has been for some time...

Dr Ian Sanne... changes in Covid in South Africa..

but asserts that ivermectin results are inconclusive..

once upon a time.. there was remdesevir

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…101/2020.09.24.20200196v1

"The use of dexamethasone for ventilated and remdesivir for non-ventilated patients is likely to be cost-saving compared to standard care. Given the economic and health benefits of both drugs, efforts to ensure access to these medications is paramount.

.. there are experts and there are experts.on Covid..

NHS England suspends one-to-one nursing for critically ill Covid patients

Quote from JedRothwell

a nurse was stationed with him at all hours,

At that time the n:p ratio was 1:1

now it is 'relaxed' to 1:2 ...

"

Nurses will be allowed to look after two critically ill Covid-19 patients at the same time after NHS bosses relaxed the rule requiring one-to-one treatment in intensive care as hospitals come under intense strain.

NHS England has decided to temporarily suspend the 1:1 rule as the number of people who are in hospital very sick with Covid has soared to 11,514, of whom 986 are on a ventilator.

https://www.theguardian.com/wo…ically-ill-covid-patients

Ivermectin meta analysis Liverpool U..

waiting on results from Latin America.. manana..in a month's time?

Quote from Fm1

said they are expected soon

Quote from Curbina

some titles seem interesting at first sight.

Frank Lad's "JUST PLAIN WRONG" is mildly interesting

Wikipedia,, states

"Aspect's experiment was the first quantum mechanics experiment to demonstrate the violation of Bell's inequalities. Its irrefutable result allowed for further validation of the quantum entanglement and locality principle

Lad writes to the contrary

"The fabled violation of Bell's inequality by the probabilistic specifications of quantum mechanics derives from a mathematical error of neglect.

I will show both why and how the probabilities of quantum theory actually do respect these bounds, airing the mathematical error of neglect. It will also become apparent why no physical experimentation can be designed to test the matter. There is nothing to test.

https://www.researchgate.net/p…Quantum_Violation_of_Bell's_Inequality_a_misunderstanding_based_on_a_mathematical_error_of_neglect

Quote from Wyttenbach

hort: FDA is the most corrupt bunch of mafia people in USA!

The Corruption of Science

Bruce A. Chabner

A view from a small fish in the pond...something rotten in the water

"To counteract this corruption of science, it is vital that the scientific community speak with one voice to protest. The directors of government agencies such as the CDC and FDA must not succumb to the inappropriate pressure and political motivations of the administration and, if necessary, should resign rather than collaborate in misguided policies and messaging. Furthermore, our academies and national organizations must speak out to defend the sanctity of science and protect the health of our nation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7648364/

TM 7.31

Ivermectin advised against by NIH in August.. based on expert opinion..

a lot has changed since then... a massive amt of clinical data has come out...

I guess the NIH 'experts' will sit on it into the NY.

Happy NY everybody...

Quote from JedRothwell

here is huge difference between an expert dismissing cold fusion without evidence, and an expert who dismisses HCQ for technical reasons described in a paper

Depends on your POV.. there are experts and experts.. ,, and evidence and evidence.. btw

do not confound ivermectin with HCQ..

Quote from JedRothwell

However, it appears that experts did look at them

Experts looked at LENR results too a while back

Choose your expert

petition for ivermectin

Chet Tran21 hours ago

As a practicing physician, general internist, I contracted Covid about 2 weeks ago.

Started right away with hydroxychloroquine, zinc and Z-Pak. After lying in bed for 1 week without much clinical improvement.

I subsequently started on ivermectin regiment per Dr. Pierre Kory, MD from FLCCC.

Within 24 hours, I felt better. And after the second dose, I was 80% back to baseline.

Without ivermectin, I would certainly be admitted to the hospital and who knows what happened after that. Trust me, while laying in bed fighting for your life, you get to read a lot of research. This one saved mine. Thank you.

Quote from JedRothwell

It is a negative result, which is not what you want to hear, but that doesn't mean it is wrong. On the contrary, anything you believe to be true is probably false.

It is a negative result?????

No results posted.. please read the document properly..

"

"Right here:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04668469

Plan to eliminate Covid in Belgium.... not for gutless wonders at the top..

"

Proposal to “eradicate the new coronavirus from Belgium in less than six weeks”

On December 21, Marc Wathelet, PhD, coronavirus specialist and consultant, came up with a “Plan to eradicate SARS-CoV-2 from Belgium and Emergency Trial proposal for Ivermectin,” published in English on LinkedIn.

“I propose a straightforward plan that would eradicate the new coronavirus from Belgium in less than six weeks, which would be enormously beneficial at all levels: sanitary, economic, social, psychological and political! We could resume all economic activities and schools within three weeks, masking would become unnecessary in most contexts by the sixth week.”

Wathelet insists that the plan “requires seeing the opportunity of Ivermectin facing us, and the political will to take the necessary decisions to convert this vision into reality for Belgium. It will require tremendous leadership at the very top.”

https://covexit.com/ivermectin-to-save-belgium/

definitely no groupthink here