- Male
- 68
- from Sydney,Australia
- Member since May 10th 2015
- Last Activity:
Posts by RobertBryant
-
-
There are hundreds more references
Bubble bubble toil and trouble... Shakespeare
"
Let sea-discoverers to new worlds have gone;
Let maps to other, worlds on worlds have shown;" Donne
There is not much gap between the speculation of theoretical physicists and metaphysicists
However the latter is more lyrical
-
China's nuclear is safe .....until it isn't
"Lu Tiezhong, a member of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), told the Global Times in an exclusive interview that China's nuclear power units have a world-leading safety record
-
I ran across a post from Bob Greenyer
Did you run across a post where Bob Greenyer stated what Axilself stated about the population of "EVO tracts"?
Bob Greenyer assayed the population of EVO tracts within an small but representative area of a sample of the two foot diameter sphere that had been given to him for analysis and projected the number of EVOs from that number. Bob came up with an estimate of a quarter quadrillion EVOs indicated in that calculation.
-
sustainable, non harmful technology!
Florian Metzler persevering with Fe57..
Tantulum 180.. nuclear excitation for batteries
he4 + 22Mev >> metastable deuterium????
theoretical paper in preparation with a Hamiltonian
whoopee
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
le nouveau CEO.
Vive le CEO et la presidente
-
to pass off this devilry EVO as science?
Perhaps your science needs its own thread
-
Why create trillions of new entities EVO when neutrinos have not yet been dealt wit
Neutrinos are a lesser devil..perhaps you need to create a separate cell for them..
-
Roberto Oros di Bartini
At least he wrote stuff down.. rather than handwaved
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26408302_Relations_Between_Physical_Constants
-
You should work with Bob directly to come to mutual agreement
You should not misquote Bob..Malcolm with your Axilsay...
"reminiscent of EVOS????"
transmutes to "Bob Greenyer assayed the population of EVO tract"
so I take this info as coming from Bob himself
In truth this info comes from Axilself
-
The objective of these discussion points
Rather than Axil hearsay I'd like to see Bob's writing
"the number of EVOs"
Less Axilsay transmutation of youtube words would be useful...
-
The scrip for this video was approved for publication by Bob
Rather than Axil hearsay I'd like to see Bob's writing
"the number of EVOs"
with all assumptions stated.
sorry I.m not ingenuous enough to accept that
"reminiscent of EVOs" TM 9.29
is really "the number of EVOs"..
Let them who have ears...hear Matthew 11.15
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
Bob came up with an estimate of a quarter quadrillion EVOs indicated in that calculation.
Unfortunately a calculation based on a whole lot of handwaving assumptions
Maybe sufficient for the ingenuous
but I'd like something like
his verifiable Radiacode measurements of thorium
TM 1.31.14
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
As time marches on, ingenuous people will learn how to turn the EVO to task,
Count me out ,sorry,
I'm not ingenuous enough to believe in trillions of EVOs...
-
2011 Blog
Open Access Scientific Publishing
Engelen is not critical of the status quo in nuclear physics
a decaying status quo ..
The future of nuclear energy is not in fission or ITER but in LENR
"And no CO2 emissions. Germany has decided to close its nuclear power plants. That is a remarkable decision that the government seems to have taken overnight. The phasing out of nuclear power stations will lead to a disappearing need for technical and scientific knowledge in the field of nuclear energy. There will be no more technical and scientific innovation in this area. In Germany."
Jos Engelen i very critical of everything,
-
Above a few watts to up to 10 watts of power production:
..sounds like handwaving to me
surely your reactor has a certain volume
if you scaled it up 100x then a few W would become kW
perhaps you need to incorporate energy density as an ingredient in your polari BosenEVO-false vacuum word salad?
-
power production of the reactor under 10 watts
that's not much of a detail..
tell us more of the detail of your 'appropriate' reactor design, Axil
Length width height mass material energy input etc
-
distrutive forces that can't be countered but must be avoided by appropriate reactor design
Presumably Axil has 'appropriate' reactor design details available
-
Resolved?
Nothing resolved... that would require more than a few replications by others..
Besides its too upsetting for the status quo
Holmlid's latest response to the status quo
"5. Final comments
“The paper of Holmlid and Zeiner-Gundersen makes claims that would be truly revolutionary
if they were true.”
The claims are true.
I suggest that you try such experiments yourself.
You have the resources and if you have problems I offer help.
Please note that the review was based on close to 50 published papers.
Why should you be able to spot all the errors that must have been made in measuring and publishing these 50 papers if they are not correct?
“We have shown that they violate some fundamental and very well established laws in a rather direct manner.”
H+E probably mean the baryon number conservation law which they misunderstand as shown above. No other fundamental law was referred to. Their discussions about the hydrogen molecule demonstrate no understanding of quantization of angular momentum in atomic and molecular physics.
Such quantization is fundamental for the theory of H(0)."
-
at least Huang has some exptal results..
Akito Takahashi's explanation for 'outrageous' Neon 22
"
Therefore, O-16 + 4H/TSC fusion, namely 4 protons capture has rather small cross section (or very small astrophysical S-value).
In contrast, O-18 nucleus is modeled by 4 alpha-clusters + 2 neutrons.
When 4H/TSC-min (4 proton-cluster) approaches to O-18 nucleus, strong isospin exchange (p-n binding) happens to enhance very much 4p capture cross section (or large astrophysical S-value) in O-18 + 4p (4H/TSC-min) fusion reaction. (We can say, like “resonance fusion”.)
The above nuclear fusion process can explain why Ne-22 atoms were selectively detected without Ne-20 and Ne-21, by Huang et al.
This scenario is of course speculation at the moment, but it looks rational.