To Jed
I have it correctly- these are the ERV data - BTW have you seen the recorded, minute per minute data much more relevant.
Now if the the pipe is indeed 40 mm the story ends
no more than 100 kg/hoursteam can pass though at atmospheric pressure.
How can you guarantee the pipe was 40mm?
My calculation is simple and OK.
The pipe had to be at least 200 mm, if it was not the data are not correct- we have to find the good one.
Peter - I don't know how wrong you have previously been in other points in your life but you could not be more wrong now. Rossi is the one who attacked IH last April by simultaneous filing litigation and unleashing a slanderous and libelous PR campaign.
IH has strongly responded and plans to see this through to the end. There is no hate - this is a fight against a known criminal / trickster / liar (can you deny any of those facts?) who picked a fight with people who don't put up with that kind of crap and have the resources to see that through.
Furthermore, how can somebody of your knowledge and stature possibly defend the perfect daily flow rate and temp numbers in Penon's data? It is not possible. Penon wasn't there and was spoon fed what he should have realized was ridiculous and outrageous non-data. He then ignored accountable questions and expects "expert" treatment now? Apparently only by folks like you. You need to start realizing that your brand and reputation have started to swirl around the drain.
Wake up Peter. Please snap out of this state that you're in.
Display More
Can you?
peter
Dear Dewey,
First i have to thank you for saying I am wrong and not putting in doubt my mental sanity - in the spririt of the document I presented here yestrday.
If you do not hate Rossi, please have empathy and see his side of the story:
- during the Test and some days after there was
a valid- not annihilated contract and no official messages of 'it does not work" results we paid
are fake- so he was surprised and disappointed for not getting the money;
- I have shown you and have many many clear messages etc showing not he started the "slanderous and libelous PR campaign".
(IH has started it but by intermediaries- as you);
- calling a 4 years collaborator associate of IH
"known criminal / trickster / liar" is not appropriate what do you think, not the best diplomacy; qui ressemble s'assemble sy the French
as regarding the data, as i wrote to Jed too, we have to see the data effectively recorded minute by minute and then we will see how those round values were calculated-you must kill those data not criticise them:
- not answering to Murray- the half full pipe idea and the 40mm pipe justify ignoring him, really, if not invented they are offenses to logic; what's the truth?
I am at an age beyond ambition- we will see what will happen to my reputation.
It is about hatred for Rossi- would you wish to one supporter of him "burn in Hell?" if you do not hate?
return to realism, please!
peter