Posts by s_grey

I do not have to believe every word. Conduct an experiment, take a maximum of $ 10 per lead and sulfuric acid. The experiment will show who is right.

Put in a warm place, connect the LED - it will shine, "forever."
Maybe due to the residual effects of electrolysis may be due to the dual polarized layer, who knows.

For calorimetry few possibilities. Going the other way - is very slow rise in temperature, the rate of 1 degree / minute or less. The sharp drop in capacity (it I can learn more -less) even without an increase in temperature argues heat.

For the accuracy of such a method is not needed. The errors do not matter, they are constant and do not affect.

For some reason there is heat - is another question. A continuous operation of the reactor it is obviously not the combustion of released hydrogen from a nickel / metal of the reactor tube, or other chemical processes. Within 40 minutes the reactor gave about 100W redundant power. It still remains to change the heater resistance at these temperatures all the drift.

@Tarun
Now that you have a working reactor, are you planning to do proper calorimetry?

A sense calorimetry? it does not convince skeptics. For me - the main attitude of the spent energy to produce heat. Suffice rough estimations. The objective is to provide itself with warm, not someone something to prove. It is useless to argue. Zemelvaysa effect, he argued the same truths, 20 years proved that if to wash their hands before surgery the mortality rate drops sharply. He put in a psychiatric hospital "luminary of science", just like here. Skeptics written sheets with proof of why it does not work, but others do.

While fully operating reactor there. All the while, another experiment soon. If you fall apart - try a tube of graphite. It is neutral with respect to the catalyst.

The task - to run completely self-supporting. Those. upon reaching effect - warm to the maximum, to 0 to use an external source. It will be difficult, but I'll try. This is the best proof. Of course, the ideal - to generate steam and then electricity.

--- То же самое, по русски --

Now that you have a working reactor, are you planning to do proper calorimetry?
А смысл в калориметрии? Скептиков она не убедит. Для меня - главное отношение затраченной энергии к полученному теплу. Достаточно грубой прикидки. Задача стоит обеспечить себя теплом, а не кому то что то доказать. Это бесполезно доказывать. Эффект Земельвайса, он то же доказывал прописные истины, 20 лет доказывал, что если мыть руки перед операцией то смертность резко понижается. Его в психушку посадили "светилы науки", прям как тут. Скептики пишут простыни с доказательством, почему это не работает, а другие делают.

Пока полностью рабочего реактора нет. Все в процессе, очередной эксперимент скоро. Если развалится - попробую трубку из графита. Он нейтрален по отношению к катализатору.

Задача - запустить полностью на самообеспечении. Т.е. по достижении эффекта - утеплять по максимуму, до 0 потребления с внешнего источника. Очень трудно будет, но постараюсь. Это и будет самым лучшим доказательством. Конечно, самое идеальное - вырабатывать пар, а потом электроэнергию.

I also wonder if a grounding wire is affixed to that pipe, can a current to ground be detected in that grounding wire?

One time had a thermocouple kontachit catalyst. There were disturbances. About as here: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/ener…12_.15_800-1300-400s_.jpg
After the measure between the earth and the mixture - except pickups from PWM nothing noticeable. During the measurement of PWM is not cut off.

Photo paper does not try. The phosphor of the light bulb daylight does not respond. I watched in complete darkness.
Another reactor tube is ready. It remains to wait for drying. A few days will continue to experience.
http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20160213_1.jpg

When the effect is obviously going on and the power is reduced because there is a constant glow?

Reactor much heat insulated. Power supply is small enough. The reactor was lit inside the heat insulation. Photos taken after the removal of the insulation.

In the last experiment, the thermocouple was far enough away from the hot zone. Thermocouple temperature does not exceed 600 degrees Celsius. I worked for about 5 minutes with an excess of heat (a sharp drop in capacity) to a spiral fracture.

Make sure it works - very simple. Maximum Week takes to the preparation of materials. Dear replicators, spend a little time and make sure. May
not work for a long time (as in Russia and Parkhomov and Lenz and
others - worked for a long time) to failure, you will have the
confidence that everything is working. Finally, stop feeding the trolls groundless critics.

There is quite a language barrier. Could you explain what you did, all experimental parameters and so on to e.g. Peter Gluck
than he could give us a proper english translation.

It will be better when the questions in the column. For each answer.

The electric double layer.
Take a completely discharged battery, heat it - emf increases. The LED will light up (maybe with 2,3,6 elements connected in series). Battery nobody has been able to discharge to the 0. Try it yourself. Surprise. Direct conversion of heat into electricity?

For the purity of the experiment make themselves a lead acid battery, then try to bring it to a 0 voltage. When heated, it will recover. Unforgettable impressions are guaranteed. Especially if you measure the amount of energy spent on the charge and discharge.

Paradigmnoia: The heating occurs at a rate in 1 degrees per minute. No more. The heat from the spiral thermocouple reaches no more than 2 minutes. If I may say so. The higher the temperature - the faster. 2 minutes - maximum. All my experiments are available here: http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/2
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/3
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/4
At the top of the page there is a translator. Use the graph to estimate. All reactors are more or less similar. In recent experiments. I probyval rapidly heated and cooled. For example here: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/10.1_.16_2_.jpg
Spread in the file data to plot.
1452952281 32 1032 645 118
1 time in Unix format
2 voltage
3 Temperature code of ADC ((data_acp -42) * 0.4717; // temperature in degrees translation, 42 - offset)
4 power (multiplied by 3)
5 PWM (0 - 255)

Still - it averaged power during 60.
The voltage and PWM - served as it is. PWM - on the chart is not displayed.

Mats002: I merkantilny interest in the reactor - too lazy to light the stove with firewood. Reactor - a good substitute. I engaged for quite some time, since last year. Actively engaged in the reactor beginning in the winter because it's cold. Summers are hot - take a break.
Fade is not going to. I am completely open for information.

Why Parkhomov lost - I do not know.
The plans - to be ready once the reactor with another heater in five days (nichrome wire). It is more flexible - it is hoped that will not burst (fechral why it breaks).

There was a break for almost a month - departed from nickel tetracarbonyl. Safety technique must be observed.

But not only did Parkhomov reactor, even for example:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015…laim-cop-over-3-at-1347c/
Note the same temperature over 1300 degrees.
Once again I draw the attention of distinguished replicators on this circumstance.

40 minutes of the reactor - too little electricity spent many times more than it worked out. I agree with you - you need continuous operation.

axil: The inaccessibility of some materials - sometimes leads to surprising results!

No vakkuum (((all homemade equipment .. The Middle Ages (((Check for
good equipment -.. Do better and share the results of all will be good!.
Of course there is KOH.

Open cell, hydrogen is passed, slightly enriched D.

Google translator changes the meaning :(. Sorry.

Yes, the color purple - power. It is considered as follows: the voltage multiplied by the duty cycle of the PWM. The inaccuracies are compensated by the number of samples.
In case of breakage of the heater - Power risen sharply, due to the
increased voltage (open load, the simplest stabilizer parametric). DC Power do not measure.
A thermocouple is inserted into the end of the reactor. Calibrated 0 (melting ice) and 100 degrees Celsius (boiling water). To detect the effect of this is enough. You can even be considered in parrots, the main thing - the power ratio before and after the reaction, insignificant mistakes. The graph shows that it is. 40 minutes - long enough period of time.

Absolutely! There's a mixture of metals. Does it really matter what it contains, if necessary effect?
From KOH I washed with distilled water. Here's a photo: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20150827_111732_1.jpg

When choosing a mixture of metals from batteries was guided by the fact that for the efficient operation of the metals inside must absorb hydrogen, manufacturers have picked up everything you need in the correct proportions ;). To the same effect LENR use metals with high absorption.
And do not even forget to add Li .. The truth is not all. But it does not matter - Lithium batteries are widely available.

If someone will be repeated in the clear, as I have - beware of nickel tetracarbonyl. It is very poisonous. In the initial stages of heat is released.

1. Fuel - the contents of the Ni-Mh battery. Photo: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20150826_122330.jpg (the battery itself). http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20150826_122734.jpg (demolition, glows red - likely lithium salts are present).
2. Fuel is packed into a metal pipe photo: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/1.jpg
On top is covered with alumina cement Secar-71 for electric insulation. Sergio wound spiral fechral diameter 1.6mm. The resistance of about 2 ohms .. (do not remember).
Helix also plastered with cement.
3. The fuel container inserted mullite tube. To submit H2.
H2 - receiving via electrolysis, sulfuric acid, lead plates. Moreover, out of 6 normal liters of distilled water was made 2 liters. Electrowinning (slight enrichment D2, wherein D stands for lead about 7 times smaller than H).
The assembled reactor looks like this: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20160105_134647833.jpg (I have them all similar).
With the inserted end of the K-type thermocouple. At the other end of the supplied hydrogen. The current on the electrolytic cell 1A. Controlled all PWM controller with PID controller. Power supply:
http://jivisam.ru/uploads/ener…ramitel_transformator.jpg PWM
regulator and ADC (next)
http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/shim_regulator_atmega8.jpg

The slow rise in temperature occurs approximately 2nd day. Graphs can not show, not kept as interest was not. A
typical performance of the experiment, for example here:
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-re…ht/next/3#experiment_10.1
(please note this is only an example quite other data!).

Total Parkhomov between Rossi and -they are both warmed up reactor 1300+ Celsius.
Why replicators heated to 800-1100, and then outraged that nothing works? This is strange.
If the reaction is not at such a temperature - Quenching will run. I have to be started at least three occasions.
Power of my power is insufficient. We had to be insulated. I lifted the isolation - the reaction starts.

Mary Yugo
Who himself can not - criticize others.

HG Branzel
Pakhomov heating to 1200-1300 + Rossi same negreval to 1200-1400 and they went!
Why do not heat up to such a temperature? And with more than COP >2-3 measurement accuracy is not so important to fix the effect.

Almost all of the experiments described here:
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/4
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/3
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/2
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht/next/1
http://jivisam.ru/page/moja-realizacija-e-cat-ht
There is a translator (in the top of the page)

Photograph mobile phone bad quality. The equipment is completely improvised. Ask if that is not clear.
The following experiment will put on this forum as soon as once the reactor is dry after 2-5 days. What works - convinced. It remains to prove the disbelievers with numbers and graphs.

Wishing to replicators - heat slowly (I have 2-3 days is spent on heating) and to a temperature of 1200-1300 + will succeed!
If the reaction does not start - Quenching. In three cases, it was launched.

From numerous experiments, accurately recorded in the 2 x cases Heater power reduction (a temperature increased). The first time he worked for about 40 min., The second time around 5min. Spread charts. Where the temperature is 500 to thermocouple, it is much higher in the reactor. Please note, heater break occurred at 16.48-49. It was the destruction of the spiral heater in both cases. Unfortunately run at high temperatures. It is necessary to 1200-1300 degrees Celsius to start the reaction. Available materials do not allow all reliably at such temperatures.
brian Ahern - You warmed up to 1300+, or many others who did not get to 800-1000-1100?
Still, I was the reaction after the sharp cooling of 50-100(??) degrees. At least three times I recorded.

Someone does, others criticize. Everything is fine, it works.

Many fundamental discoveries made by dropout, or young professionals. They probably his half-taught did not know that you can not do, and nothing happens. Sometimes they accidentally turned.

A venerable academics - for example, believes that "the stones from the sky can not fall." Still - think about the number of legs flies and Aristotle. It's credibility - afraid to go against him. And prove him wrong flying nearby. Yes, and fear for their reputation. Reluctance clown look, even if they do not agree with the "official" theory.

Usually, other people's work is criticized by those who themselves can not do anything. In this way, they increase their own importance.
Or competitors.
Powered him or not - is not the question. Repeat, and then criticize.

No, of course not visible, the graph clearly.
I can provide measurement results in the second by second http://www.jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/16.1_.16_.jpg
----
1452952281 32 1032 645 118
1452952282 32 1032 645 109
1452952283 32 1031 646 111
1452952284 33 1031 646 111
-----
1 - time in Unix format
2, the voltage across the heater
3, data from the ADC
4-O (divided by three)
5 filling PWM
====================

temperature ADC is considered as follows:
ADC termo = (ADC termo -42) * 0.4717;
42 - offset. 0 degrees to the ADC = 42.
---
Power multiplied by 3. In fact - it is necessary to divide by 3.
resistance spiral .. I do not remember, did not record .. 1.9 ohm. Power thought so:
Voltage = 9.2 * (0.01929 * ADC_mega); (divisor 8.2 com and 1k resistor)
Power = p_nagruz / 255 * Shim_mega; Shim_mega - PWM duty ratio.
Power supply - parametric, transformer. 30K microfarads capacitance.
These data are sufficient?

Antoine10FF: My apologies that it was not on writing.