Posts by Adriano Bassignana

I could find the correct idea of inserting a different thread, but I do not think that this is the measure that can dissolve my doubts. As I said, it is enough to shield, with a body that can absorb photons emitted by the wire, or a wall face (even if only partially) by the black body. When it is necessary to make a correct flow calorimetry is necessary that the inside of the calorimeter is a black body, and the temeprature of the inner wall should be as low and as constant as possible. For this the calorimeters are made with metal and with the inner wall possibly burnished and externally must be completely covered by a jacket of water (or other fluid deemed appropriate for the test). The cooling fluid must flow quickly enough in order to prevent the temperature to rise so as not to affect the test. In this case, I mean the first experiment seen in the movie, I think it is sufficient to insert a steel tube that surrounds but does not touch, the quartz tube. Obviously this is a calorimetry absolutely primitive, but if the values of the temperature with the filling of air and after hydrogen tend to approach, then this explains the mystery that ultimately would not be a mystery, but only a measurement error

Another possibility is to do a test with helium (instead of air), but I do not know if this is in the lab ... you can always buy from those who distribute gas in cylinders for industrial use, or get the tanks used to charge the balloons (but beware that it is pure helium ...), but it seems this approach complicated when a simple metal pipe can approaching to the experiment to a real calorimetry.

The experimental setup, runs a test on water flow with air and then with H2, in this condition the wire is very bright in the air, obviously because the greater thermal insulation (the air is much more thermally insulating than hydrogen) It makes hotter the wire. While, in hydrogen, the wire is colder, as the hydrogen is much more thermally conductive and transfers more heat to the wall of quartz which is obviously more hot. The experimenter clearly confirms this fact by noting the doubling of the outside temperature quartz. This is logical, as the thermal conduction of hydrogen is much higher than that of air and the result is coherent and the nickel wire, hence the wire is more red, ie its light emission has a greater wavelength .

So it can not say anything with the simple measurement of the outer surface of the quartz tube, should make a calibration into helium, then you can say something more correct.

For the test with the flow water pose serious doubts whether the investigator, first, do not insert a converter I / R outside of the quartz tube, for example, can build a converter with a tube made of refractory material or metal such as stainless .

Or anything that allows photons thermal wavelength longer being absorbed (and subsequently re-emitted at much lower frequency or by thermal conduction) before crossing the water and then exit from the transparent container.

The water is transparent to the radiation blue-green, that which is present at the highest temperature of the nickel wire in the air! But at that frequency the water absorbs less (as explained above), and then the water heats less because the device gives less heat to it!

Instead, when there is the hydrogen, the temperature of the exterior of the quartz tube is higher, but the part of emissive (nickel wire) is colder (red color of the nickel wire, as is clearly seen from the movie! ). In these conditions the water is "heated" in a more efficient, since the quartz tube exterior is actually hotter (.. he says so, that in that case the quartz tube is surrounded of vapor bubbles ...) and the thermal emitted photons have a greater wavelength which is better absorbed by water.

Thus special I believe that the experiment does not allow to say anything if the experimenter before it further refines the device, ensuring the full absorption of thermal photons outside of the quartz tube.

Quote from News-Feed

[feedquote='E-Cat World','http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/09/06/new-nickel-hydrogen-excess-heat-claim-with-celani-type-cell/']Here’s a new name and a new experiment for us to consider. This comes from Russia from an experimenter named Andrei Hrischanovich who published the following information today, September 6, 2015, on the Russian Cold Nuclear Fusion and Transmutation website here. Following is a Google translation (edited). Andrei Hrischanovich repeated the experiment with a Celani cell. We […][/feedquote]

The experimental setup, runs a test on water flow with air and then with H2, in this condition the wire is very bright in the air, obviously because the greater thermal insulation (the air is much more thermally insulating than hydrogen) It makes hotter the wire. While, in hydrogen, the wire is colder, as the hydrogen is much more thermally conductive and transfers more heat to the wall of quartz which is obviously more hot. The experimenter clearly confirms this fact by noting the doubling of the outside temperature quartz. This is logical, as the thermal conduction of hydrogen is much higher than that of air and the result is coherent and the nickel wire, hence the wire is more red, ie its light emission has a greater wavelength .

So it can not say anything with the simple measurement of the outer surface of the quartz tube, should make a calibration into helium, then you can say something more correct.
For the test with the flow water pose serious doubts whether the investigator, first, do not insert a converter I / R outside of the quartz tube, for example, can build a converter with a tube made of refractory material or metal such as stainless .
Or anything that allows photons thermal wavelength longer being absorbed (and subsequently re-emitted at much lower frequency or by thermal conduction) before crossing the water and then exit from the transparent container.
The water is transparent to the radiation blue-green, that which is present at the highest temperature of the nickel wire in the air! But at that frequency the water absorbs less (as explained above), and then the water heats less because the device gives less heat to it!
Instead, when there is the hydrogen, the temperature of the exterior of the quartz tube is higher, but the part of emissive (nickel wire) is colder (red color of the nickel wire, as is clearly seen from the movie! ). In these conditions the water is "heated" in a more efficient, since the quartz tube exterior is actually hotter (.. he says so, that in that case the quartz tube is surrounded of vapor bubbles ...) and the thermal emitted photons have a greater wavelength which is better absorbed by water.

Thus special I believe that the experiment does not allow to say anything if the experimenter before it further refines the device, ensuring the full absorption of thermal photons outside of the quartz tube.