wyttenback, please explain CF energy transfer?
No basic fusion is aneutronic. The neutron is not a key building block of matter - one of the big mistakes in the standard model. E.g. 4-He contains no neutrons. We often see an Xray spectrum from H*/D*-clusters. Mostly due to recombination induced by CF energy transfer.
This is experimental data logged over 5 years with dkfferent setups and using different detectors. how can you state this is impossible?
Display More?The text may need modification..or is the contradiction for effect.
"
This highest bremsstrahlung of 50 keV corresponds to channel 800, whereas the shoulder
at channel 200 corresponds to 21 keV X-Rays. We can conclude from figure 10 that the PMT detector set
up with aluminum foil acts as a simplified primitive low energy resolution X-Ray detector. The most likely
cause of the spontaneous radiation from the active chamber is therefore X-Rays.
"However, this conclusion is in fact impossible since the active chamber has no ongoing excitation with
laser or high voltage. Hydrogen has only entered a particular catalyst, and X-Ray emission from such a
chemical process is generally regarded as an impossibility.
Next we have to add the pulse shape observations. The radiation emitted from the active chamber can
come in bursts of multiple events within an event, as shown in figure 12. One raw pulse can contain up to
6-9 individual faster peaks indicating that the emitted radiation also is a combination or succession of pulse
trains, packets, or clusters. We do not see random smaller amplitude pulses between the main pulse clusters.
From this, we can only conclude that the we are most likely observing X-Rays bunches coming as random
events from the chamber."
The interesting result is that deuterium (vizaviz hydrogen) increases the radiation intensity and level
up to around 50 keV
Thank you Alan! I will provide link to the preprint of two articles as soon as the journals has given green light.
If someone can reach Rends, kindly ask him to remove the copy of my article as i am about to publish a updated article. I cannot publish as long as he is sharing content... 
A bunch of fucking scallywags. Falce science, uncalibrated detectors no actual research and people with no background to be able to see this theough, or even understand whats going on. Ceo has been framed as a bitcoin datacenter fraud inNorway. Stay away at all cost!!!
If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it? Sometimes maybe we are just 50 years too early in technology development to understand. If a new research group or company has funding to continue some of the research im happy to help with both theoretical knowledge, applied physics knowledge on system configuration, reactor operation, detector construction and logging and material knowledge. But im finished with chasing investors to make it happen.
I agree Prof Sveinn and I have a lot of very interesting data, still unpublished due to several reasons. Most likely normal physics playing tricks. Entrophy is always your enemy. Thousands of hours was spent in this field but Sometimes researchers see the same physics but will interpret the results differently.
Sometimes published research in one field unfortunately needs a correction. Being a pioneer in one field is always hard when no one tests the physics and challenges your claims while you publish. Lack of proper funding and resources ended my research a little short. Planned publication of all research is before christmas. The observed effects are very much real but maybe we are just just missing the detector technology to correctly interpret the radiation.
I agree, we are still 'scratching the surface' of the physics that truly underlies the phenomena underlying LENR! But there is no need to be so abrasive to @Bruce__He does make coherent and basic valid points in understanding the analysis used. The simplest way out is to accept Leif Holmlid's work as scientific FACT.
There is a difference on accepting his work as scientific facts, or accepting his conclusions as scientific facts.
Shell s105 catalyst can be bought from ebay
If enough people are interested i could probably hold a workshop on preperation, reactor construction, activation, and detection.
Hey Rob, call me when you have time.
Hey Simon, whats going on. Could you call me?
Just curious, what kind of detectors are you using? Im still surprised researchers are trying to detect nuclear reactions using temperature sensors....
Yes, no question... Hydrinos/UDH/ Dense Hydrogen/ HERO.. Loved child has many names..
Life is too short, lets focus now...
Btw, udh is the most common material in the universe. Just because we cant see or measure it in many experiments due to lack of sensor technology doesnt mean its not there... its everywhere...
Several efficient methods. Measure time of flight on ions in the chamber, Or measure pressure fluctuations or aim a pmt with aluminium foil towards the chamber. If ions have velocity above 4% of c, you see pressure fluctuations or the radiation increases you have udh....
What are you trying to achieve?
10 m concrete?, no no, this is not s runaway system. Easier to just use a water cooled jacket or liquid Hydrogen.
Neutron shielding with heat extraction already exists and can be delivered from several companies.
One muon source in the middle of a Dt fusion tank looks very nice but is not very optimum regarding the fusion vessel volume, fusion point distance to walls, muon decay length to Dt gas, tritium handling, heat extraction, operating redundancy of the complete system or muon thermalizing materials. We are designing a system that will be able to operate 24/7 even if half of the muon sources are down.
Why not just ask us for a licence, seems like a far easier and cheaper method than to use years of trial and error....
