Online
Alan Smith Admin-Experimenter
  • Member since Nov 10th 2015

Posts by Alan Smith


    Inside the superconductivity scandal

    In 2020, physicist Ranga Dias claimed to have discovered the first room-temperature superconductor — a material that would not require any cooling to conduct electricity with zero resistance — in a landmark paper published in Nature. It was retracted. Then came a fresh claim in another Nature paper, in 2023 — also later retracted. Now, an investigation by Nature’s news team (which is editorially independent of its journal teams) reveals how Dias distorted the evidence for room-temperature superconductivity — and indicates that he concealed information from his students, manipulated them and shut them out of key steps in the research and review process. The scandal raises questions about how universities, journals and funders deal with research misconduct.

    Nature | 22 min read

    To load Ni it is best to use a strong electrolyte solution, like 0.5M K2CO3 at a high temperature- something like 70-80C. Pulsed DC electrolysis is also said to be better than constant voltage/current.


    For co-dep in nickel I have been pondering the use of a 25% Watts plating solution (Nickel Chloride/Nickel Sulphate) also warm to hot. The reason for using the Watts solution so diluted is to slow down the process while keeping the voltage up above the Faraday Limit - necessary to split hydrogen from water. If you use full strength Watts solution the plating goes too fast - a matter of minutes.


    There is an early paper by Randall Mills in Jed's library that discusses hydrogen loading, but not co-dep.

    Disruption, Democracy & the Global Order: An Evening with Yuval Noah Harari

    mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmcusercontent.com%2F4ea4100d3725552d8efc5a0ef%2Fimages%2F30a6ee37-eb50-9912-2aec-b68b40690f81.jpg&t=1709910202&ymreqid=4d3ea96b-ee1a-f21c-1cbb-c40001015400&sig=aP3pQ9aXKQTv.agFIDJDzQ--~D
    CSER and King’s College Cambridge hosted a talk by Professor Yuval Noah Harari on Disruption, Democracy & the Global Order. Harari’s talk focused on avoiding global war, which he thinks is necessary for providing the resources and wisdom to deal with other existential risks.

    Yuval is joining CSER as a Research Fellow, the first appointment in the Institute for Technology and Humanity’s Distinguished Fellowship programme.

    Read the blog

    Watch the recording
    By Seaver Wang and Juzel Lloyd

    What Do Fast Chinese-Led Builds Mean for Nuclear’s Future?

    Nearly every finished Chinese nuclear project starting construction since 2015 — and the vast majority of projects commencing in 2010 or later — has entered service within 7 years. This real-world trend flies in the face of the tiresome and longstanding claims that nuclear energy technologies inherently exhibit a negative learning curve, and that nuclear reactors require a decade or more to build.
    Historic analysis shows that nuclear energy can achieve positive learning curves and fast reactor builds, but commentary on the present and future of nuclear energy technology is at any rate incomplete unless one thinks globally. In fact, China, India, South Korea, or Pakistan are proving more favorable for nuclear project construction than the West. A more comprehensive perspective indeed suggests that worldwide, even as the trajectory of renewables and storage rockets upwards, the role of clean nuclear power in supporting decarbonization will in all likelihood continue to grow as well.
    Success elsewhere also illustrates that hurdles faced by recent nuclear projects in the United States, France, or Finland do not originate from some inherent quality of nuclear power, but rather logically reflect a combination of regulatory, market, political, and societal factors.
    With nuclear power clearly flourishing in China, it is time for energy commentators to unequivocally acknowledge that nuclear energy can succeed under different circumstances. That recognition in turn ought to motivate clean energy advocates to contemplate what we can do to create different, better conditions for nuclear technologies closer to home.

    NOTICE OF GENERAL MEETING OF THE SFSNMC.


    Société Française de la Science Nucléaire dans la Matière Condensée

    Convocation à l’assemblée générale de la SFSNMC
    Ordre du jour
    Vendredi 22 mars 2024 à 19h00 – Réunion virtuelle par l’intermédiaire du site :
    https://meet.jit.si/SFSNMC
    Ordre du jour :
    1- Rapport moral du président
    a. Rapide rappel de la situation des RNBE dans le monde
    b. Relation entre la SFSNMC et l’ISCMNS
    c. Préparation de la conférence de Strasbourg en septembre 2024
    d. Site internet
    2- Rapport financier
    3- Renouvellement du bureau
    Si vous souhaitez introduire d’autres points à l’ordre du jour, vous êtes priés de me le faire savoir.
    En guise d’introduction l’AG sera l’opportunité de présenter et de discuter les relations entre la SFSNMC et l’ISCMNS. On se souvient avec émotion que le CEO (Chief Executive Officer) de l’ISCMNS Bill Collis est décédé l’an dernier. En conséquence l’ISCMNS s’est restructurée. Lynn Bowen a été nommée présidente et Alan Smith est le nouveau CEO. La nouvelle présidence a l’ambition d’augmenter la visibilité de notre science. Pour cela, il est proposé de comptabiliser ensemble les membres de l’ISCMNS, de la SFSNMC et de la société japonaise JCFS afin de donner plus de poids à la communication. L’effort de communication est d’ores et déjà visible sur le site web iscmns.org qui a été remodelé.
    Dès sa création la SFSNMC s’est présentée comme la société miroir de l’ISCMNS pour la communauté francophone. Les futures modalités de coopération seront discutées et décidées lors de l’AG. Bien à vous
    Jacques Ruer
    Président SFSNMC
    [email protected]




    AG SFSNMC 2024 Ordre du jour.pdf

    I asked to post a video showing the step-by-step mass balances and stoichiometry to LENR-New back in November 28, 2023. I am still waiting. Perhaps we can get Alan to let me post it here.

    We don/t actually host any videos ourselves, but load them onto Youtube or Vimeo and link them. Please go ahead, it might not end up in our video interview thread but we have no problem with linking it in an appropriate thread.

    Jean-Francois has kindly written an abstract of his paper, which is the opening post in this thread. For convenience I attach a link to the source.


    Justifying the possibility for excess heat (abstract)


    We start from mathematics with one of its paramount questions which is the continuity hypothesis: Does there exist a cardinal between and ?

    We keep on noticing that there are 2 theories dealing with fluids:

    • The kinetic theory of gases
    • Fluid mechanics

    Both have flaws. The former one cannot exhibit any viscosity whereas it makes planes fly. The latter, while dealing with unspecified numbers of molecules packed into a fluid molecule, makes extensive use of continuous calculus such as derivation and integration.


    Now we refer to phase change in physics with the dotted line on the following diagram

    During this process, one cannot determine the exact time when we are in a gas or liquid phase.We suggest coming back to Ancient Greece physics which discovered the atom through considering a different number of molecules per unit volume depending on the phase (gas or liquid) we are considering.

    This brings us, trying to keep rigorous, to consider any fluid as a continuous set of points, each weighed by an infinitesimal mass, and choosing a number of points of for a gas and for a liquid per unit volume.The traditional phase transition through the curves would work according to the continuity hypothesis, but when moving through the fluid phase, intermediary cardinals would appear, physically breaking the continuity hypothesis.


    This would therefore bring to the possibility of thermodynamics new effects in relation with those cardinals which generally do not appear.

    In brief, if such a process really is at stake, this would incite the physicists of LENR to look for excess heat under such conditions as phase change going around and not through the critical point. This is where we expect to get a positive result.


    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378610245_Justifying_the_possibility_of_getting_excess_heat

    One cubic meter of water contains exactly the same number of protons, neutrons and electrons as one ton of copper.

    Not quite, The ratio of protons to neutrons in water is p10:n8 but in copper it is p29:n34 (or n36). So water has more protons than neutrons, copper less.

    ETA - the rarer O18 isotope has an P-N ratio of p8:n10 but this is cancelled out by the 2 protons contributed by the H2 part of the molecule, making it p10:n10

    The way Arata acted, he was not far wrong when he said people were out to get him. It was a self-fulfilling prediction.

    One of his former junior colleagues told me that he sabotaged an experiment they were performing together because he was desperate to prove that the premise (not Arata's) it was based upon was incorrect.

    Why did they hire untrained monkeys and did not invest in any training or simply:: The valve was never moved for 40 years....


    Result:: Pressure corrosion same as natural welding. There was no chance to open it certainly not at 5 minutes before 12 o'clock.


    What would a Swiss do? Ask his army friend for some explosives (same outcomes as seen...) or a hole drilling tool with utmost care for the last 2mm..

    I was concerned about this at the time, and noticed that the roof panels were held on by bolts as is common with the type of building used. I emailed a Mitsubishi engineer I knew had volunteered to go there to help saying they should just remove one or two roof panels to vent the H2. It never happened because PM Naoto Kan -who I am told had taken a 1 term module on Nuclear Physics about 40 years before - decided he knew best and took over co-ordination of the problem. His first actions included sending all the Mitsubishi guys back home, including several who had designed the plant systems.