Few months ago, i was contacted by a russian team which promised also revolutionary technology !
@David Fojt : The best thing one can do to convince an investor is to file a patent, that will stay unexplained for years.
Regarding the patent I can only use my simple logic. If you have a reactor that only runs in a very, very narrow range of (P,T), then it is easy to understand that any energy gain will distroy the "so called" narrow range condition.
Using higher dimensional math is an other way to confuse an investor. Even I have to struggle with 4 Dimensions (not the separable 3,1..) and using 6 will restrict the number of people that really understand it to a few ones world wide...
As many might know, three dimensional rotations are a piece of cake, if you use 4 dimensional space, what is heavily used in graphics algorithms. But if somebody introduces 3 time dimensions, then he has misunderstood some basic concepts of math related to physics. As I mentioned long ago. Time is an abstraction of a "continuous physical event", a contradiction in itself. Time can only be use in macroscopic physics, if the synchronization points of the "continuous physical event" are narrow enough.
In reality even physics simulates time by counting the oscillations of a shell electron e.g. of Cs. Thus real physical time is alway discrete time.
Conclusion: This guy has first to explain how a wave/electron evolves in three time dimension and what added value such a concept will bring to physics.
I can only recommend to study Mills ART metric, which is a "timeless" (or uniform timed by c2) 4D metric.
Did you ask the Russians for a demo?