This is assuming that IH didn't apply for that patent as sole inventor, that is, totally independent of anyone else including Rossi.
kazm
Member
- Member since Jan 25th 2016
- Last Activity:
Posts by kazm
-
-
Please keep your items up to date so as to not give others the wrong impression about your efforts. See my reply lower down about the GeNiE reactor that was to be built on Guam. It is a no go because of premature science and political corruption.The gbgoble sit is not upto date on some ofr its publications. The SUGAR
airplanes are on schedule for engineering. The other item about the
GeNiE reactor power plant to be built on the Island of Guam was side
tracked politically local to Guam. The governor there gave the OK for
the power plant prematurely (insufficient research in the basic science
before going all gung ho to get it built and with money exchanging
illegally. Basically too much corruption and getting ahead of themselves
to be realistic. enformable.com/2013/03/impeach…uct-fast-breeder-reactor/ -
The gbgoble sit is not upto date on some ofr its publications. The SUGAR airplanes are on schedule for engineering. The other item about the GeNiE reactor power plant to be built on the Island of Guam was side tracked politically local to Guam. The governor there gave the OK for the power plant prematurely (insufficient research in the basic science before going all gung ho to get it built and with money exchanging illegally. Basically too much corruption and getting ahead of themselves to be realistic. http://enformable.com/2013/03/…uct-fast-breeder-reactor/
-
dartin: As one oil producer has replied to the question"What will you do when LENR is confirmed and marketed?". "Why, I'll buy it to use it to extract oil more cheaply"
-
Hot fusion has major problems
http://www.jp-petit.org/NUCLEA…non_controlee/ITER_en.pdf -
Shane D.
Attributed to"
Gregory Byron GobleFebruary 19, 2016 at 01:42
I guess you are saying that Rossi can pull the wool over the eyes of the Canadian DoD? Study up and reconsider.Special Policy Project
Defence Research and Development Canada, Corporate Office Ottawa
As a senior analyst in the Office of the Chief Scientist, provides
strategic analysis for S&T policy, capability and outlook, power and
energy (P&E) in sustaining defence and security capabilities, here
and abroad, with an emphasis on off-grid and arctic future challenges.
Develops and manages projects in support of developing program
innovation, excellence and knowledge management for Defence R&D
Canada and the Defence S&T Enterprise.New publication: Evidence base for the development of an enduring
DND/CAF Operational Energy Strategy (DOES) : Expressing Canadian values
through defence operational energy stewardship here and abroad. http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc189/p800726_A1b.pdfQuote from the publication
Most recent results from the third party independent E-Cat trials
showed exceptional energy densities. When including internal plus
external components the volumetric energy density observed was (3.6 104 ±
12%) MJ/L and the gravimetric energy density was (1.3 104 ± 10%) MJ/kg.
The energy densities of gasoline are 32.4 MJ/L and 44.4 MJ/kg
respectively. So the E-Cat is thousand times more volumetric energy
dense and 293 times more gravimetric energy dense than gasoline.The conservative E-Cat gravimetric power density was (4.7 103 ± 10%)
W/kg. Jet engines of Boeing 747 and Airbus A300 offer a power density
5.67 kw/kg. So the E-Cat is almost as gravimetric power dense as these
jet engines. Wärtsilä RTA96-C 14-cylinder twostroke turbo diesel engines
display 0.03 kW/kg. So the E-Cat is 100 times more gravimetric power
dense than these ship engines.