think your irony detectors are not sensitive enough in this case. I have of course no evidence for that sentence. It is pure speculation. In exactly the same way that LENR (induced by a special active environment) is pure speculation. Both hypotheses have the same merit - they explain the FPHE observations
One problem is that THHuxleynew appears to have made a variaton the Kirkshanahan theories.
His statement
"CCS errors from this cell of an ATER type would follow from the special active environment on
the electrodes created from the D electrolysis that allows ATER"
indicates causation via the expression "follow from"
Kirkshanahan never stated that the SAE caused CCS
Now THHuxleynew brings in irony detector... there is no irony here.
Also THHuxleynew cites pure speculation..... there is no speculation here,
What is here in this statement is CONFUSION and BABBLE .
THHuxleynew could not remember exactly what Kirkshanahan wrote in 2002, 2005 and cobbled together
what he could to make some kind of offthecuff expert-sounding response to answer my question at that time.
Another problem that arises is that THHuxleynew brings in the idea of MERIT.
Kirkshanahan's theories are not based on his calorimetry and electrochemical experimentation
An examination of his 43 papers from 1985 to 2017 shows colorimetry as the nearest thing!
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kirk_Shanahan2
Kirkshanahan's theories are verified by ZERO experiments even though 17 years has elapsed since CCS's conception.
He has had ample time to do this in the DOE Savannah labs. and now
unfortunately has been removed from there to the Seminary for another mission.
So his CCS/ATER theories will never be experimentally verified.
The anomalous excess heat in LENR has demonstrated experimentally by hundreds of researchers
from 1989 to 2917. The transmutations in LENR similarly.
The theories behind LENR are still being tested by researchers such as Mosier-Boss and Takahashi
who have the relevant expertise and the relevant experimentation and the WILL to do so.
Kirkshanahan's theories have very LOW MERIT.
and yet THHuxleynew states in another offthecuff expert-sounding response
"CCSH is a better fit to the known calorimetric facts in these experiments (excess proportional to heat in when effect is present). "
Perhaps this matter deserves an entirely NEW THREAD entitled
"THHuxleynew's variation on CCS causation and effect."