This conference is pretty intense, some are more laid back, but this one seems very buzzy.
That’s a great bit of information! Thanks! Nothing like being there to sense this kind of aspects, so much gratitude for you to share this kind of insights.
This conference is pretty intense, some are more laid back, but this one seems very buzzy.
That’s a great bit of information! Thanks! Nothing like being there to sense this kind of aspects, so much gratitude for you to share this kind of insights.
I am so grateful for the Glimpses you are sharing here rubycarat Alan Smith AlainCo . Can I ask if some presentations are being recorded at least? I am so eager to see some of them but so far it seems none is available for anyone not there either in the Flesh or Virtually.
Bummer, I thought I was going to be able to attend in my laptop, as I can’t get my phone to like zoom, but if the meeting was pw protected then I hope it was recorded and we can watch it later.
I Thought It was at 6:30 pm, that’s 1:30 pm my time zone, or in 1 and 1/4 of an hour.
LMAO! That’s the difference between “Free Energy” and “Free, for me, Energy”.
That is awful.
The average retail cost of electricity in the U.S. is $0.16 /kWh. 1 MWh is $160. 142 MWh = $22,720. 1 bitcoin = $26,010. So if bitcoins fall below $22,000 they will not be worth mining. Let us hope that happens. They were below that for most of 2022. Click here on the 5 year tab:
I was even more shocked to know that some smallish electricity generation companies in the USA are mining BTC on low demand times, the article I read mentioned one that had purchased a coal fired thermoelectric plant and refurbished to burn natural gas, they said they were raking in USD 500 K extra doing that.
Just shocked to see that it takes an average of 142 MWh to mine 1 BTC. Bonkers.
Alan Smith , I wonder how many BTC-MWh they could be “mining”. I am under the impression that ENG8 has said something about putting their tech to this use, but may as well be my imagination.
Burning stuff for energy is all about how cheap is the stuff you burn and how clean you can make the exhaust. It can be done right, if you intend to, but if all you care about is to maximize profit, then the likelihood that the cost of doing it right as opposed as just doing it will not be attractive.
QuoteMy theory of LENR is based on the possibility that there exists of a hierarchy based relationship of fields that can allow for the manipulation of emergent fields by adjusting more fundamental fields.
That sentence evoques to me scenes of the movie "Inception". It can only happen in dreams.
A Review of Experiments Reporting Non-Conventional Phenomena in Nuclear Matter Aiming at Identifying Common Features in View of Possible Interpretation
Thanks, is hot off the press. I appreciate the long term line of thought they are proposing here, coherent with their background appraisal of the relevance of the energy density threshold to achieve LENR effects.
only occasionally being consulted on odd tribological issues
Do you think any water in the gearbox oil can trigger those “odd tribological issues”? There’s a paper I shared in the forum some time ago where the researchers found transmutation only when used a glycerol aqueous based lubricant, they thought it might be LENR.
Anyway, thanks for bringing this interesting windmill design to my attention, I don’t know why it makes me think inmediately of the Coanda effect, which is not related directly but popped up in my mind the moment I saw this because it reminded me the Coanda solution for helicopters without a rear rotor, which is also a sort of hollow tube.
A Tesla turbine might indeed help lowering costs of this design even more.
We are being invited to review and see if with our aid the preprint for Bing Juine Huang’s ICCF 25 presentation can be improved, or if it’s already the best it can be.
As I see it, this looks like a great opportunity, but also, in the terms it is presented, might be seen as a "harvest of ideas". Anyway, interesting and positive, absolutely positive.
I believe that would be a civil suit. Rossi would not have to present for that to be tried. He could not be extradited for a civil suit. He might come back to the U.S. for a trial, but he would be free to leave again.
I know little about the law, but that is my understanding, bolstered by some Google searches.
A civil suit can always proceed in absence of the person being sued (often taken as an advantage to the person suing) and the court can rule asset forfeit in favor of the suing party. I think that, in the case of “il dottore”, if that has not happened already, it simply won’t.
This came today within the Anthropocene institute newsletter.
Let’s vote for this to enhance Cold Fusion visibility. It includes Solid State Fusion and one of the panelists is Yoshino from Clean Planet.
The link work OK from my computer. Please let see know if there are problems.
In these cases you need to specify within your Google Drive that the file can be read by everyone with the link. You can also choose that people request access to it and this way you will know the e-mail of everyone that asks permission.
Most of the time people forgets they are using a tool, and, good or bad, the end result will always be the responsibility of the one using the tool, not the tool itself. A bad tool can get a job done, as long as the one using the tool is aware of the tool’s shortcomings. I have had to use a 12 mm wrench and a flat screw driver to loosen a 10 mm bolt, on road emergency. Not efficient, but can be done if you know how.
Not trying to wind anybody up.
But it doesn’t take much to get the
Rossi Skeptics going.
If you consider 12 years of BS “not much”...
A patent must describe a working device and how to construct it
“by anyone skilled in the art” is the part that you are not paying attention to. Patents have never been required to be an instruction manual. And “skilled in the art” is vague enough to get away with the degree of vagueness that patents show.