I'm afraid I don't recognise this as corresponding to the physics I know, Kazunori. Sorry.
Branching and fragmentation of dipole strength in 181Ta in the region of the scissors mode
I'm afraid I don't recognise this as corresponding to the physics I know, Kazunori. Sorry.
Branching and fragmentation of dipole strength in 181Ta in the region of the scissors mode
I don't think it's controversial. Even the Standard Model says the neutron is composite. I'd say what's controversial is how it's composite. Take a look at this:
Neutron: structure and geometry of charge distribution
There is a scissor mode.
This is a phenomenon in which gamma rays are re-radiated when gamma rays are irradiated to the nucleus.
I anticipate that scissor mode is also caused by neutrinos.
Neutrinos are not particles, but the shortest electric field pulses.
Neutrinos are transmitted using nuclei as a medium. The neutrino then supplies a charge to the proton.
Protons that are supplied with electric charges emit electric field pulses and gamma rays around them because their size changes.
I call this proton oscillation. Proton oscillation creates a standing wave of gamma rays around the nucleus.
Orbital electrons fall into the valley of standing waves.
The standing wave of gamma rays is the cause of quantum leaps.
The above may be science fiction.
Not in detail but had heard of it. I think you would find that in this forum there are a number of persons that are active researchers and proposers of Nuclear and particle models that could be said to have the EM force and Electrons as much more central than ussualy thought of.
slightly off topic.
Another important thing is that the Coulomb force does not neutralize on the way.
Some people have the same idea as me.
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/ElectricFields.htm
If the electrons inside the nucleus give a repulsive force to the electrons in the orbit, de Broglie waves are no longer necessary.
The idea of neutrons as a composite particle is one that Santilli says his research has proven. But it remains controversial AFAIK
do you know about nuclear electrons hypothesis?
Welcome again!. Do you perhaps have a link to a paper with more details of your suggestion?
hi,
I am science writer. my articles is here.
What is mass? Accelerating electrons generates a magnetic field that becomes resistance. Similarly, protons generate electromagnetic mass. Since light is a pulse of an electric field, there is no electromagnetic mass. Light appears to be particles because of the properties of electrons and protons that transmit electric field pulses.
Since neutrons are composite particles of protons and electrons, they have an electromagnetic mass.