Shane D. wrote:
Dewey,
I am not going to dig it up again since the Rossi Blog Reader is down, but in July 2013 Rossi claimed a milestone achievement, that IH, all on their own, without his help, built an Ecat. Then mixed the fuel, started the reaction, operated it and got the same results Rossi got. He was very proud telling his fans about this accomplishment.
That of course contradicts your comments, that IH's assembled team of capable scientists has been unable to duplicate any Rossi product.
Let me get this straight. Rossi said something that contradicts what is said by Dewey Weaver, who is, by all accounts, an investor in IH with some access to privileged information, as major investors might be. Because Rossi said it, it must be true, so Dewey Weaver is wrong. Is that what is being claimed here?
I mention this, because obviously IH's first DD with the 30 Ecat units was successful, or they would not have paid Rossi the $10 million, plus bought the 1MW for $1.5 million?
What is "obvious" to a full-on believer is not obvious to those not similarly afflicted. What is a "successful" test? Was Lugano successful? Really, it depends on when you ask. It was successful in convincing the independent professors, and many others on first reading. But, later, issues with the techniques used arose and that test is no longer considered "successful" by scientists, including some who originally thought it was. Was the Verification test successful at convincing IH to go ahead with the $10 million? That's much more likely, but still not a necessary conclusion. IH at some point decided to play along with Rossi, in spite of doubts that would be obvious to anyone who studied the field, as have existed since 2011, well before IH became involved.