Because Defendants are not permitted to introduce facts outside the Complaint and its Exhibits
So why did they then proceed to introduce those facts in the following sentences?
IH Fanboy
Member
- Member since May 23rd 2016
- Last Activity:
Posts by IH Fanboy
-
-
Rossi did not deliver on the IP license or the 350 day test.
Because of IH trickery? (I can feel myself throwing up a little in my mouth.)
-
not deliver any working IP, then use a press release to cancel the agreement. Am I reading this correctly?
And IH thinks they can continue filing patent applications on that "not working" IP?
-
"IH fanboys" who cried for censorship
Hey, careful there my friend, wachyoutalkinabout?
-
The hot core cannot be much hotter than the metal box (the outside metal), because it is bolted to it, and metal conducts heat well. There is no insulating material between the core and the metal box.
If this is true, then Ascoli65's model breaks down, because it requires an insulator or air gap between the hot core and the water. How certain are we that the core components are bolted to the outside metal box without an insulator or air gap in-between?
-
IHFB - A fabulous fabrication - please explain how you have somehow concocted that I am threatening Hank?
Well, usually when one tells another that they need to hire a lawyer, especially in a rough and tumble context, it can be interpreted as a threat. My apologies if that is not what you were intending to evoke to Hank.
-
IHFB - play period is over and the teacher says is snack time then nap time.
So, an insult after some spin? At least it is something. Can we just have some honest clear answers from you rather than the evasiveness? If you are certain in your position, you can be more forthcoming. And I will actually give your information and answers a fair shake. But I'm just not seeing anything close to candor at this point.
-
I agree that you need an attorney. Henry hired a new attorney for JM Products. A nice real estate lawyer from the sounds of things.
I suggest you stop threatening Hank. He is harmless and is just trying to get to the bottom of the matter. It makes you look small.
Who is Henry? And are the "restart letters" from JM Products demanding that the 1MW system be restarted? Did IH have a contract with JM Products that extended beyond the one year test?
-
Nice one IHFB - nope but don't get too hung up on this. The even bigger problem for Rossi comes when the flowmeter model number and specs become public knowledge. More comedy....less pain please.
So, no real answers to my questions? Just more spin?
-
No idea about the 480 system status on the outside of the building.
You don't know whether the transformer is inside or outside of the building, but you are certain that the whole "system" was ripped out?
-
IHFB - the 1MW system test flowmeter from whenever it was installed.
Are you suggesting there was only a single flowmeter that was ever installed?
-
The fun is just getting started - where's Sifferkoll?
Is that your way of saying you are done answering my questions?
-
IHFB - the box that Rossi had put the removed flowmeter in and taped shut.
Whose flowmeter--Rossi's or the ERV's? Or IH's? (IH had their own, correct?)
-
IHFB - the 480v system is no longer inside of the building.
What do you mean by the 480v system? Do you mean the cabling? Because otherwise, you are left with the transformer, which is probably left untouched and outside of the building (although such transformers are sometimes inside of buildings such as these).
-
Rossi fought like crazy to keep that box from being opened including ordering Fulvio to physically prevent the IH team from opening and taking pictures. The IH lawyer took over and the box was opened.
What box?
-
IHFB - ask your fearless leader what that all means. Ripping out 480 is not trivial.
That didn't answer my question. Are you suggesting a 480VA transformer was ripped out and taken somewhere?
-
System drained, flowmeter boxed, etc...etc....
That sounds like some serious el-destructo. Was that Rossi's own flowmeter you are referring to? Or are you suggesting that Rossi was handling the ERV's flowmeter?
-
I guess the restart letters from JM were not serious as Rossi has ripped all the plumbing and power out down there.
Can you clarify what you mean by "restart letters"? I think it would be helpful to communicate clearly with the LENR community so as to avoid implications rippling around that perhaps are less than accurate of the underlying truth.
And, how does one go about ripping out power? Was the transformer to the building ripped out and hauled away?
-
The author of the mail, Alan Fletcher, says that Higgins sent his analysis to Lewan, so we can be sure that the relief valve was there, and was set at 2 bar (abs).
Well, I think that requires a bit of a logical leap. Merely sending an analysis to Lewan doesn't make the analysis accurate. But, I must say, the conjecture regarding the oscillating internal pressure / temp during "SSM" caused by a relief valve does seem plausible.
-
Dewey,
Does the ERV report state that the 100.1 temperature was measured or was it a place holder?
Rossi claims that the ERV disregarded temperatures below and above. If that is the case, the report is not claiming that the temperature held steady at 100.1.
My guess is Dewey won't answer. I've asked him to clarify a number of times, but with crickets as an answer. He really enjoyed how much mileage he got from the implication within the community of it being a measured value though. I lost a little respect for Dewey by that whole episode.
