however he has argued against it
But HE only speaks Rossi-speak! We're getting a bit recursive here!
however he has argued against it
But HE only speaks Rossi-speak! We're getting a bit recursive here!
You gotta learn rossi-speak! As noted above "AI chip" means "control chip".
I'm using chatGPT4 for software development, for modules up to about 200 lines of PHP code. It's very good, and has a much better understanding of earlier posts in a chat than did GPT3.
(ps : I just had my 60'th anniversary as a programmer).
If he's making his own "AI Chips", it's most likely a Gate Array, which is user-programmable. No IC Fab required.
Deja vu all over again: neither proof nor disproof.
Even ECW commenters agree it is meaningless.
E-Cat SKLep SSM Livestream To Start Today (March 13, 2023) –
Not even going to try to analyze this one.
Based on my earlier tests, that headlight is consuming way less than 10W.
And the picture of the base is so blurry one can't even tell if there are wires or an inductive power source.
He still refuses a resistive load -- cost $100 for a calibrated resistor(1% would do) and a combined oscilloscope/voltmeter
An experiment that relies only on neutrons to prove LENR is doomed to fail.
But they still need to be measured to a high degree of precision, as close-to-background neutrons is a signature.
The GEM-2023 Energy Conference Zoom is starting (playing a pre-recorded promo from the podium) -- Setting Up ?
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/8563…pOGdhU2MwemVETHBLZnkrdz09
Brand new (today) Business Plan (etc)
https://brilliantlightpower.co…ess-presentation-updated/
United Scientific Group a non-profit organization takes the honor to invite you to the Global Energy Meet (GEM) which will be held on March 06-08 (Virtual: 09-10), 2023 at Boston, MA. GEM-2023 hosts important gathering and foster connections that will spur the innovations in Energy fields.
BLP has a brand new (today) business presentation https://brilliantlightpower.co…ess-presentation-updated/
They say they have patents (and pending patents) They have improved COP from 1.8 (1 POINT 8 to 5+
Edit : missed the flyspeck "."
An innovative torque transducer (like what gears do) - fine.
I don't see anything gear-like about this.
In the formula P = T * A or T = P / A a gear reduces the angular velocity A to get more torque T at constant Power P
Of course the simplest fake would be to feed the torque monitors from a monster machine off-screen. Would a visible inspection of the cable run be enough?
Another would be to house a big clockwork spring in the supports. But that would run out of power, so the test would have to be run for a suitable time.
A third would be to power a hidden electric motor, fed through the supports.
Am I mistaken (or deluded, or a scammer) in thinking that
power = torque * angular velocity?
https://www.engineeringtoolbox…-power-torque-d_1397.html
(I recalculated the output, and got 15W -- Torque 4 at 35 rpm)
Ah well ....
My friend calculates the output power for a constant load as about 10 watts / hr.
I know this is proof of concept, but that seems a bit low for practical use.
Al you ned to do is synchronise your pulse frequency to your torque meter sampling frequency, and you can easily get an apparent over-unity.
The torque meters show a frequency of around 30-35 rpm most of the time (I saw one at 50 rpm).
The torque plot shows the "sin" waveform of push/pull -- at a resolution much finer than that. From the lack of visible steps, I'd say maybe 100:1
I've downloaded the video, and the frequency looks about right. I could frame-by-frame and calculate the angles if need be, but THAT would be a waste of my time.
Just looks like another variant of the magnetic gearing idea.
Sorry, your intervening post slipped past me.