JulianBianchi Member
  • Member since Jun 3rd 2016

Posts by JulianBianchi

    Catalytic atomic hydrogen torch <-> Holmlid-type experiments

    can: Does a kind of atomic hydrogen torch commercially exists where instead of getting dissociated with an electric arc, hydrogen gas passes through/over a noble metal catalyst of some sort and is there a specific name for this device? I'm aware that this is basically what Holmlid-type experiments already do, using different catalysts at relatively low pressure (generally < 0.1 bar) in a vacuum chamber. It just seems like it's something that might already be routinely used in a slightly different form in real-world applications.

    Thank you can for this great initiative. There is much information that I will need some time to read and digest.


    Here I'm just replying to the above question: what you describe looks like a hydrogen membrane that is used in the industry for several applications such as hydrogen purification. Hydrogen or deuterium passes through the membrane and desorbs on one side of the membrane. If I'm not mistaken (can someone confirm?) Fleischmann & Pons were using some types of palladium that were precisely produced by Johnson Matthey for that purpose.

    Thank you Fm1 for sharing. A must read.

    The Mystery Of India's Plummeting COVID-19 Cases


    https://www.npr.org/sections/g…plummeting-covid-19-cases


    Last September, India was confirming nearly 100,000 new coronavirus cases a day. It was on track to overtake the United States to become the country with the highest reported COVID-19 caseload in the world. Hospitals were full. The Indian economy nosedived into an unprecedented recession.

    But four months later, India's coronavirus numbers have plummeted. Late last month, on Jan. 26, the country's Health Ministry confirmed a record low of about 9,100 new daily cases — in a country of nearly 1.4 billion people. It was India's lowest daily tally in eight months. On Monday, India confirmed about 11,000 cases.

    "It's not that India is testing less or things are going underreported," says Jishnu Das, a health economist at Georgetown University. "It's been rising, rising — and now suddenly, it's vanished! I mean, hospital ICU utilization has gone down. Every indicator says the numbers are down."

    Scientists say it's a mystery. They're probing why India's coronavirus numbers have declined so dramatically — and so suddenly, in September and October, months before any vaccinations began.

    Can Ivermectin Help Prevent COVID-19 Deaths?

    https://articles.mercola.com/s…ctin-for-coronavirus.aspx

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE-

    • While preliminary evidence seems to suggest Ivermectin can be useful at all stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection, its real strength appears to be as a preventive approach
    • Of 58 health care workers who took ivermectin once a month for four months, only four (6.96%) came down with mild COVID-19 symptoms during the May through August 2020 trial period, compared to 44 of 60 health care workers (26.67%) who declined the medication
    • In August 2020, India’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh, added ivermectin to its recommendations and distributed the drug for home care free of charge. The state of Bihar also started recommending ivermectin, and by the end of 2020, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh had the lowest and second-lowest COVID-19 fatality rates in all of India
    • A WHO-sponsored review suggests ivermectin can reduce COVID-19 mortality by as much as 83%
    • In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance is calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19

    And please don't shoot the messenger.

    About new mutants escaping the antibodies developed from vaccines based on the spike antigen, it was only when and not if this will happen. To vaccinate a population with a highly prevalent virus, as done now in many countries, will only make this step faster. Some spiteful tongues would say that was deliberate so that big pharmas will be able to sell vaccines every year. Repeat business with high margins, what else?


    A solution may come from multi-antigenic vaccines, see

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19819-1

    or at least from vaccines based on the nucleocapsid antigen that is known to mutate much slowlier than the spike protein and is not involved in cell entry, see

    https://jvi.asm.org/content/94/13/e00647-20


    Here, we are studying the effect of several natural compounds, mainly flavonoids, in vivo to prevent the fusion of the virus with ACE2. To show it in real life is much more a challenge than in silico and in vitro (that have already showed positive results). The trial is now completed and all samples will now be analyzed with a newly developed neutralization assay that has already proven to work well. Results expected for end of February.

    Assume for the sake of argument you are right, and the doctors got it wrong. That was not deliberate. The medical establishment sincerely concluded that hydroxychloroquine does not work.

    I don't know what is your own definition of "sincerity" when 100% of the early treatment studies did show a positive effect. Do you mean the same sincerity as the doctors who faked the data towards negative results and led to the retraction of two articles in the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine about the use of HCQ?


    Please cite a single, non-retracted, study that shows that HCQ doesn't work in early treatment. You will not be able to cite a single one, not because you are not an expert or too busy or whatever, but simply because there are none, nada, zero. The only studies that failed are those when HCQ was given too late, in the late stage after disease has progressed. And yes many have failed when HCQ was given too late.


    The medical establishment is as biased in the assessment of early treatment drugs as the physics community is in LENR. Probably not deliberate but wearing blinders. Tunnel vision.

    You are mistaken when you say the medical establishment rejected ivermectin and vitamin D. These are in widespread use.

    Maybe in Jed Rothwell world, but not in the real world. The millions who died and are still dying as we speak didn't receive ivermectin. You are putting yourselves among the murderers by claiming that ivermectin is in widespread use and didn't prevent all these deaths.


    At least WHO has reacted this week and has now launched an "expedited but still comprehensive" independent review to possibly change their current recommendation which is to not use ivermectin. Some would say better late than never.

    Hydroxychloroquine was tested in very large blind tests, and most of those tests failed to show an effect. It is possible the tests were faulty and it actually does work in some circumstances. But doctors and researchers must go with the best information they can. They must judge the situation with the data they have. So, it is reasonable for them to reject this drug.

    Plain wrong. Again and again, 100% of the early treatment trials showed a positive effect. Doctors don't go with the best information they can, they go with the information that best fits their needs, and early treatment is not one of those.


    And I'm not talking about prevention with small actions, easy to implement by anyone, that can have a large effect to ensure a well working immune system.

    is this based on FLCCC.NET?

    Not that I know. They claim to be independent scientists.


    Who is @CovidAnalysis?
    We are PhD researchers, scientists, people who hope to make a contribution, even if it is only very minor. You can find our research in journals like Science and Nature. For examples of why we can't be more specific search for "raoult death threats" or "simone gold fired". We have little interest in adding to our publication lists, being in the news, or being on TV (we have done all of these things before but feel there are more important things in life now).

    Why should we trust @CovidAnalysis?
    There is no need to. We provide organization and analysis, but all sources are public and you can easily verify everything. For the meta-analyses, all data required to reproduce the analysis is contained in the appendix, with direct links to the original source papers. For the country-based analysis, all data is public and the analysis is simple to replicate. We also note that many equally qualified experts report contradictory conclusions. If you don't like our analysis, you can use our database to locate information you may have missed for your own research.

    Who funds this research?
    We have no funding, this is done in our spare time and we pay the web hosting fees personally (about $100 per month).

    Can we use your graphs?
    Yes. You can use any of our work free of charge.

    Murder is murder. The leaders who did this for political gain were as culpable as drug dealers who sell heroin, opioids or cigarettes. As far as I am concerned, people who sell heroin are as evil as those who gun down innocent people in the streets. It amounts the same thing.


    Yes, the people who went without masks were also responsible. They killed themselves, the way drug addicts kill themselves. But the dealers are the most responsible.

    And the murderers are the doctors, regulatory authorities, licensing bodies and pharmaceuticals who followed their own rules and not science. The medical establishment got it all wrong. There is so much evidence that ivermectin, vitamin D and hydroxychloroquine work, and that other drugs such as remdesivir don't but are still given in some countries, that it may be the biggest failure of the health system in human history. The medical establishment is completely blind to the science:

    https://ivmmeta.com/

    https://vdmeta.com/

    https://hcqmeta.com/

    mainly because these drugs are fully effective when given as prophylaxis, or at least early, and not as a standard treatment where the medical establishment makes revenues today. A dictatorship fighting against science and patient empowerment.


    The similarity between COVID treatment and LENR is striking: the physics establishment is blind to LENR evidence, the medical establishment is blind to safe and effective treatments. A failure in both cases.

    Thank you JedRothwell. A must read. Long time we have not had a positive result of that quality in LENR. Strong evidence that hydrogen is reacting somehow to produce emissions that ionize the surrounding gas.

    Many of you continue to believe in the existence of a "charge" on the proton and electron ... To everyone who believes in this, I have long ago asked my simple questions - let's say you are “believers in the existence of a charge on a proton and an electron”, you are right and the charge is magically formed on both the proton and the electron ... Then explain to me and all physicists the following - "How is a charge of the same modulus and different" sign "on a proton and an electron born during the decay of a neutron?" Let me explain ... When the neutron rotates, forces arise that separate a small part from the neutron, i.e. the neutron is divided in the ratio 1: 1836 ... Due to the rotation of the neutron, the generated particles, the proton and the electron also rotate, and in this the Law of conservation of angular momentum is manifested ... The substance of the proton and the electron is absolutely the same as in the neutron ... What happens? Two identical substances rotate in the same direction - the proton's own magnetic moment was discovered in 1933, and the electron's own magnetic moment was discovered in 1947 ... Since the proton's mass is 1836 times greater than the electron's mass, their magnetic moments are different ... This is logical ? Yes, it is logical ... So why, having a different mass, two identically rotating substances generate the same charge modulo ??? This is nonsense! It can't be! There is and cannot be logic in this! And this is another proof that there are no charges on either the proton or the electron!

    Because of gauge invariance and not because of rotation invariance as you suggest. This is actually the main success of gauge theory and AFAIK gauge invariance has never been proven to be violated.

    It may not be glamorous. But these, together with dexamethazone, now mean that in the UK (and everywhere else following these protocols) death rate from COVID is half what it was at the start of the pandemic, with standard treatment.


    50% fewer deaths is a big deal.

    Here, it is the hospitalization rate that has decreased significantly and is the main factor in the overall decrease in the death rate. The death rate per hospitalization has only slightly decreased here.

    "When you spend your whole life believing something to be true and proselytizing about the truth of that supposed fact, it's very hard to think otherwise, no matter what the research shows."


    So true. But guess who said that? This is the same Gary Taubes we know way too well in LENR. He continues with:


    "The literature of cognitive behavioral psychology is full of studies and texts discussing this phenomenon. Cognitive dissonance … is what happens when a brain is confronted with evidence that something that brain has believed indisputably is wrong."


    That is also true. Would it be to assess the evidence of LENR, of the effect of ivermectin on COVID-19, of a keto diet, etc... I still believe that the 2020s (starting technically on Jan 1st 2021, let the horribilis year 2020 stay in the 2010s...) can be very fruitful in terms of technological advances and of the development of the human society. There's a high chance that this decade will be the one of the difference. Those who will do things differently, e.g. wear differently, sing differently, think differently, will have a higher chance to succeed. Individualism with more self-reliance and more independence will intensify, with institutions and governments playing more a second role. In healthcare, patient empowerment with more prevention, more easy diagnostics, more monitoring, and less treatment, will become the new norm. In my opinion the post COVID-19 pandemic will facilitate this transition.


    Happy 2021 and 2020s to you all.

    Right here:


    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04668469


    It is a negative result, which is not what you want to hear, but that doesn't mean it is wrong. On the contrary, anything you believe to be true is probably false.

    JedRothwell do you realize that you cite one of the most successful study about the effects of ivermectin on COVID-19 and says about it that "it is a negative result"? Sorry to say but you have lost all your credibility in this COVID-19 thread.


    Wyttenbach is right in saying that the evidence on the efficacy of ivermectin is incredibly strong and that the medical establishment has so large blinders that it fails to respond properly to the pandemic with incredibly huge consequences in deaths and the obligation of the politicians - who are completely lost - to come with extreme solutions such as full lockdowns to protect a crippled medical system. I do not go as far as Wyttenbach in saying that it is an organized mafia, I see this more as a complete failure of the western medical system that hides itself behind a completely inefficient structure and their own prejudices.


    This pandemic is showing the worst of the human being who - in current area of too much information and fake news - is not able to properly assess the evidence when such evidence goes against their own bias and prejudices.

    You don't answer to my question but thank you nevertheless for the effort.

    At least three of the spike mutations, N501Y, N439K and Y453F, may help the virus to infect human cells. These, and another change in the spike called delta69/70, might help the virus evade antibodies from people who have caught the virus before or had a vaccine shot.

    It is unlikely that the new variant will evade antibodies from people who were infected in the past. In our lab we test for both nucleocapsid-based and spike-based antibodies and most subjects develop both N-based and S-based antibodies. Less than 10% of people develop a pure S-based immunity. Hopefully the N protein is known to be less prone to mutations than the 2 S subunits. This is one reason why some manufacturers (e.g. Roche, Epitope Dx) developed a test that targets the N-based antibodies. Only a very few tests target both N and S and it is not surprising that it is those tests that have the best sensitivity.


    Unfortunately the same does not apply to vaccines. Most vaccines are S-based. AFAIK this is the case for the mRNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna for which new variants may evade the antibodies developed after vaccination. I heard that they are already working on a new form of the vaccine. Repeat vaccination is good for business....