can you please take any of the active test pictures and show us where the LENR reaction start and when stop?
so you don't want to answer, i understand....
Cipolla
Member
- Member since Jun 3rd 2016
- Last Activity:
Posts by Cipolla
-
-
@RobertBryant
can you please take any of the active test curve and show us where the LENR reaction start and when stop?
because to me it looks lilke a curve for a standard electrical heater.
and can you also explain the missing runaway of the reaction? -
How hard would it be to use the heat to create appropriate IR emissions near the grid, if that was the problem? Just apply the excess heat to the existing heater instead if electricity. Get the same temperature you get now. You don't need electricity to induce IR radiation. You need heat.
exactly.
any case i am not able to recognize any trigger point from the curves of the diagrams, they all look to me like standard electrical heater. -
can anyone please explain to me why, if the heat is triggering the LENR, than the LENR stop immediately after Mizuno stop the electrical heater? the mesh is still hot... mesh doesn't know from the heat is coming from.
-
if Rossi didn't bring to the show the scope, about what were you talking about?
"T" fitting for garden? or the two amazing red clamps? the rasted pipe?
ahahahahahah come on.... -
.... can the e-cat generate thrust ?
AR: Yes.
Warm regards.
a aaaahhh so the 60W are from the brake!
-
e-cat QX simulation
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
output 14.5 W (considering only water, no glass and heater mass)
input 0.1 W (0.2 A, 4 s on and 4 s off)
COP > 150 -
Overheating of the control box:
Combine the statements from Dott. Rossi:
Reached sigma 5 (Rossi on JONP, only Rossi knows, was that means)
At the show:
Running the 3 QXs only at 30% (Rossi at the show, because safety, bla bla) / Yes, Adrian, this is correct, watch the video
Control box has 60W
One QX has 20W, at the show 3 QX -> 60W, Control box still getting hot
100% run not possible.
In my opinion: It's a electric heater and light show, added with some hocky pokey with the scope and a spectrometer.
There is no excess heat. All power comes from the box, nothing from the "reactor".
what if the wave form shown on the scope didn't go into the reactor but was dissipated directly inside the control box?
and the reactor was a simple heater controlled by an other circuit inside the box? -
The QX is an order of magnitude better than any known previous reactor.
Consider its small size, that it can be instantly switched on and off, that it has a COP 500 - 1000. It can operate at 2300 C for up to a year.
let say.... to switch you need to open the box, not as fast as you sayExternal Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
2:31:08 Fabiani is telling to Rossi: LO SWITCH (the switch) -
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Just before the resistor test begins, the test that modified the circuit to introduce new resistor values, Rossi lifts the cover on the White control box and throws switches:
In order to maintain trust in that particular test, Rossi should have informed the audience as to what the switches do and why he was changing their settings.
If this action has not been explained thus far, Mats among others should get an explanation for this action, including what those switches do and why their setting where changed.
it looks like he is moving 2 switches. this and not the action after he closed the box (as I posted before) could be the trick moment. -
Like in this moment (see around 2:31 mark Rossi flipping switch INSIDE the case of controller box.)? Well there would be lot of opportunities to do many manually or automatically (controller could automatically switch mode by sensing the load impedance/resistance ratio. QX containing Resistor+Capacitor or Coil and MATS used just resistors, ).
In my opinion this was just demo to prepare what is cooking in Rossis Lab if he really has something. I can't imagine many professional companies, that would give a dime without proper verification first. So why even bother if he does not have anything.
It is interesting to speculate and rewind videos back and forth, but I'm going can still sit on the fence until some real verification is done.
yup, it looks at the minute 2:31:19 sound and gesture are clear. -
Maybe someone would be able to replicate Rossi's results using this kind of setup?
yes, maybe coming soon.
In fact, there is no need to resort parasitic currents losses.
Rossi may have simply used a resistance of 1mm in diameter of 30mm long to about 1000 Ohm. In parallel he has placed an inductor of about 10-20 mH, 0.3A which is very small and can fit inside the "exchanger".When measuring the system in DC, find R = 0 (from which reason the input power is very small because I ^ 2xR is very small) but at 100 kHz the inductor disappears and remains only the resistance dissipating 40-50 W at ~ 200 V.
As Mats suspected, the generator is a current generator, so when replacing the reactor with a short-circuit, the current remains 0.3A. When the 800 Ohm resistance was set, Rossi or who for him switched the power supply to the voltage generator (the power supply was a black box and also carried the ON-OFF for 3-4 seconds, so at any time can also be transformed away from voltage control and vice versa). -
at the minute 50 the trick is out.
As can be seen from the oscilloscope the current waveform is triangular monopole. This can be achieved by feeding a monopole triangular waveform with a resistance (as Mats supposes) or by feeding an inductor with a one-way square wave.
If using an inductor the resistance can be close to zero, but the dissipation can be very high by exploiting leaks for parasitic current or magnetic hysteresis. It would be seen immediately by measuring the tension on the heads of the reactor, but Rossi did not allow it. The voltage in fact is high (about 200V to deliver 50W) and Rossi 50 minutes to Mats: "No, Mats, do not touch!" and makes him move away. Poor Mats, he was about to find the trick.
The principle is that used in common kitchen induction cookers.
Rossi does not (cunningly) measure the power absorbed by the network saying that there are 60W used by cooling. But 60 W is little more than the expected power from Rossi output. In fact, a switching circuit has a very high efficiency and that power supply is generating a square wave at 100 kHz which is used to generate (via inductor) a variable magnetic field inside the "heat exchanger" generating heat for parasitic current and / or magnetic peristalsis.