Posts by Max Nozin

next thing is to ban experimental physics as expensive, dangerous and producing results which challenge established 'ab initio' correct theories.

Pallas from the abstract 'Moreover, the methods used and developed in this work will enable further increased precision as more powerful computers become available.'

why do we need experiments if we can do simulation? 'To eliminate our reliance on these experiments, here we use ab initio quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and quantum electrodynamics simulations to compute the LO-HVP contribution. '

and we will keep simulation (given more powerful computers) until our calculations fit the data.
And as always using very expensive hardware puts us in the league where our results can not be reasonably reproduced.

Alan Smith another good example is the Ukrainian Academy of Science. It was headed by Borys Paton until his death at the age of 101. He was an expert in welding . There is a bridge in the capital named after him he also had his own research institute etc. was tired of success. One episode I know for sure that the institute failed to get German welding machine to weld big pipe seams well enough so the Sovites had to keep paying Germans for the service.

I was watching a documentary about Manhattan project recently. What struck me was that young age.of scientists who made key contributions.

Most of the most talked about companies these days are also powered by younger people.

Then the above video and many other videos from scientific conferences increasingly resembling brunches at retirement residence.

Can we expect a revolution in science where both oppressors and rebels are way past their prime?

that is how you demo LED of any desired efficiency. This is legit Russian researcher who claims to have made emitter based on known physical principles generating 'ionizing radiation' making all tricks on the video possible. If he did this, the chances are somebody else figured that out as well. Now attach dummy wire to LED and get others to measure the hell out of them

Quote from miles

I don't understand, if he need this amount of preorders, why he still keeps this outdated 80's style way using a poorly created word doc, signed and sent via email?

Why doesn't he hire an average computer educated kid/student ....

Greed

Quote from Ascoli65

Recombination was mentioned in "Morrison's Cold Fusion Update No.8" (1), as indicated in the USPTO non-final rejection. This update concerns "the work that Fleischmann and Pons published in Physics Letters A", that is the 1992 boil-off experiment, and in particular "the excess rate of energy production […] four times that of the enthalpy input"-

There is no doubt that recombination is the wrong explanation for this specific F&P's claim. The alleged excess heat is actually a consequence of the miscalculation of the energy balance during the last 600 s of the boil-off period, caused by having ignored the presence of the foam accumulated inside the cell.

(1) http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/DROM/cfu8.shtml

Display More

from the article "However Lee did two simple experiments. Firstly he operated the cell with the anode and cathode very close together as F&P so that there was a chance that the hydrogen and oxygen emitted by the two electrodes could mix and possibly recombine - assuming no recombination, he calculates that he had then observed excess heat. He now moved the anode and cathode apart, and as he did so the apparent excess heat vanished. This he interpreted as evidence that recombination was occuring in the F&P - type conditions and could be falsely interpreted as excess heat."

One of the most detailed speculations on atomic H and ZPE https://chavascience.com/en/hy…cess-energy-from-hydrogen

Is Mr. Pais involved as well?

Are they going to use coal and firewood in the second chamber to trigger lent?

Quote from Wyttenbach

The idea is completely different: Thermodynamics is based on the factor 3kT where the 3 comes from the degree of freedom of two atomic gases being translative motion, oscillation and rotation. Argon has only one degree of freedom and only intrinsic rotation that is not triggered. So most energy is going into kinetic movement. Key is to keep the percentage of fuel low relative to the argon volume.

They cite monatomicity as a primary factor contributing to efficiency. If you have two experiments one with cylinder filled with argon another with air as a control. Argon should produce more mechanical energy out of same input that may pass for 'excess energy''.

Quote from Wyttenbach

The argon cycle motor: https://techxplore.com/news/20…mbustion-argon-power.html

Can it explain Papp engine's 'excess energy'?

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

No way Rossi will be around in 2031. Either he will be dead, faking death, or in exile, "somewhere in the world but not Italy".

Don't underestimate the hustler.

Quote from Cydonia

Max Nozin

Please try to avoid a truth that bothers you, be a gentleman

There are no truth or lies there are only facts you are struggling to believe in.

Quote from Qmavam

I followed a lot of Rossi, the 1Megawatt trailer, several of the other companies working on a system. After about 4 years of all promises and no product, I pretty much let it go.

I received an alert this morning and so here I am.

Is there any product yet that has actually produced energy for a month without having an input power also applied?

Is Rossi still relevant?

Is it still just a pie in the sky idea?

I would love to see it happen,but it's been over 9 years and what is there?

Heck I was ready to buy that $1,000 unit at home Depot that was promised.

Display More

Set your alarm for 2031-03-05 then check back especially if you are a big Rossi fan.

Quote from Alan Smith

Well, Max, I have a commercial hydrogen technology that is more profitable than electrolysis, and always green, But getting funding is a problem still. Most of the cash (if not sll) goes to the big players as usual.

That is why I am growing against any government interventions. All they can do is to create bubbles. Renewable subsidy, electrical vehicle subsidy, coal mining subsidy, natural gas conversion etc.

Quote from Alan Smith

Well,, 95% of the article is about some new chemical idea using silicon nanopowders - which they say are currently too expensive to use. So they are using some more conventional chemistry right now- not the silicon system they are promoting. I suspect it is powdered aluminium/gallium alloy.

This is rather like showing off a revolutionary electric car and then mentioning (very briefly) that it currently has an IC engine because your electrical magic is too expensive to sell.

There are obvious sings of gold rush and bubbling in hydrogen industry after govts. promised huge money injections.

I can see multiple articles talking about yet another breakthrough in hydrolysis or fuel cell or alternative hydrogen production tech. Those article typically have lots of preaching to the choir and numbers like 10T market for mobile power!!! etc. What they don't have is actual numbers to see how their tech is better than existing. That is why we always have to wonder what they actually doing apart form burning grant money.

In this case , I believe, the idea was to combine silicon powder hydrogen production with high efficiency power cell for things like planes, drones etc. but they don't provide how that is better than traditional jet fuel and turbine.

Navid article doesn't say so I was hoping that Alan Smith, being a specialist in exotic extraction of hydrogen, might clear it up

Alan Smith https://en.apollonsolar.com/home

https://fuelcellsworks.com/new…-water-and-powder-packet/

Some kind of silicone powder to make hydrogen .

hb11 raised around 5M

https://www.businessnewsaustra…xNbtv3z825aRu89CGlCSm-5dE