I'm wondering if there is a precessional vorticity factor in these plasmoid experiments that is hard to duplicate.
Could be everything imagine how many different combinations they could have for:
- current profile on two pairs of electrodes and the coil, parameters of the magnetic field
- parameters of the water flow
- chemical composition of water itself. You get water from the tap but who knows what was stored in the used tank before (every r&d facility in Russia usually has defence research programs)
I repeat that the effect was lost when they did biggest mistake of their lives. when the project started to get attention from higher up their boss ask them to improve the looks of the apparatus (loose wires etc). For that they disassembled existing and only working prototype and were never able to get new machine running in self-sustained mode.
One more important factor is the location of the lab itself. Magnitogorsk in build on and named after a geomagnetic anomaly caused by iron ore deposits. If you followed discussion about 'strange radiation' reproductions, you may noticed that in some cases they magnetize water used in the experiment.
Recently I found an overview Paper describing mainly all Ukrainian work sind 1967
@Wyttenbach the Paper you mentioned here about retrospective of Ukrainian efforts does not seem the be the one by the link provided or is it? Thanks.
I already looked at few <a href="http://tet.in.ua/index.php/en/plasma-electrolysys/power-generating-plasma-energoniva/description" class="externalURL" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Energoniva replications</a>, but none of them was very thorough / complete. The original system did contain four electrodes inside the coil, generating magnetic field and initiating HF discharge with HV impulse and high voltage…
Worth mentioning that Vachaev worked in the metallurgical research field. That is why the focus was on obtaining metals. Allegedly up to 40% of water was converted into powder any time they managed to light up plasmoid for extended time (minutes). Currently there are some attempts to use cascading reactors in impulse mode (up to 2% conversion) to process liquid radioactive waste.
The group represented by Prosvirnov (video is on http://lenr.seplm.ru/) were looking for funds to attempt replication. There are few other individuals trying the same, one of them is on the video posted above.
The stories about Enerogoniva say that one day when the researchers were trying to rebuild the reactor they lost an ability to have self-sustained plasmoid. Ever since all rectors are working in impulse mode cop < 1.
There are people in Russia who got access to Vachaev lab records who tried but failed to reproduce. His daughter wrote PhD thesis on that but would refuse to cooperate for reasons unknown.
http://phys.org/news/2017-01-c…quivalence-principle.html
should have they experienced cyclic changes in size due to gravitational waves as LIGO did?
Thank you for info - but do you have some link for more details? Poher also did many blind experiments with non-superconductive materials (some are even shown at this video) and the impulse he observed was much higher, than any possible error of measurement. BTW Wasn't it Podkletnov's Impulse generator, what you're talking about by now?
@Zephir_AWT what do you think about null result of Pdkletnov gen? Could it be due to too much shielding. What if they tried to shield equipment instead of radiator?
@max Nozin: Physics always was based on experiments (Newton..). The only philosophy that helps is the recognition of what is mathematically describable and what is just figure juggling.
Most people try to criticize Einstein, because seeing a big one failing makes more fun... But he was one of the few, which never were convinced of what they did.
@Wyttenbach I do not think that majority of Einstein critics are driven by that. I believe it is a frustration over a possibility of lost century. Dreaming about time travel (twins paradox etc.) while struggling to agree on something basic like hydrogen atom structure, nature of magnetic field and so on. Some calling it a scam I prefer calling it a tragedy. Who knows what would happened if aether wasn't discarded as mainstream theory? Maybe we could already have limitless source of cheap and clean power, anti-gravitation and a better planet as a result.
http://www.infinite-energy.com…ine/issue38/einstein.html maybe it is time to reconcile modern physics starting from philosophy it is built upon before continuing blending multiple theories and equations just to claim that new blend yields good results even if they are order of magnitude off?
Please add to that
http://www.encyclopedianomadica.org/English/aetherometry.php - Canadian. I believe at some point Eugene Mallow was involved with them. Looks like they went completely underground due to lack of acceptance in the scientific community.
http://www.nanoworld.org.ru/da…ta/texts.eng/19990104.htm - this is Russian inventor of microwave propulsor (there are youtube videous of experiments). He developed it in around same time with emDrive. Material is a bit cluttered but this is in-line with the most researchers in the aether field ( aka Hutchinson)
Russia/Ukraine is known for a strong support for the ether theory. V. A. Atsukovsky ( allegedly one of the inventors of twisted pair cable ) is arguably a patriarch. English publications are scarce but his work ( few dozen books in Russian) includes complete GUT where he uses gaseous ether and existing thermodynamics to explain all physical phenomena.
Experiment similar to M-M performed in Urkaine http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=2043 alomst 20 years of measurememnts all supporting ether wind.
