Posts by Richard Cheek

Quote from frankwtu

Richard

If the IP is worth having then LENR is real, if its not then either LENR is not real or IH has new IP which trumps that of Rossi.

Agreed. If the e-cat is a fraud,then what is Darden fighting to keep it for?

I'm just wondering, if IH has some evidence that the e-cat actually does not work, then are they withdrawing their patents that claim it has a COP of 10 or better?

IT would seem that if it genuinely does not work then they must withdraw the patent claim, but if they dont, then it sounds like legal maneuvering to me, not something driven by testing results.

And what exactly did IH fail to confirm? a COP of 50? That there was a COP over 1?

These rumors and idiotic hyper-skepticism of everything from the Lugano report to now the ERV report that Darden himslef paid for, is just silly stuff.l

Is it possible that Rossi is witholding some information that is undocumented on how to achieve higher performance, a 'secret sauce' or tweak?

IS it possible that IH wants to get ready for a court fight and so declaring that the 1MGW plant (that the customer bought 3 more of) is not working as a way of undermining his reputation before a court trial?

Is it possible that the source is just another Rossi-hater who is going to twist any Rossi news to discredit him no matter what the actual results are?

Good News!

Ian, what the hell are you talking about?

Can someone delete that crap?

any voltage-in data for this?

EDIT; doh! I see the column for it now; holding steady under 50 volts. household electric stove requires 240 volts by comparison.
Is there any other electrical power being consumed on the unit?

One day I think that there will be a peer reviewed article in a major journal, but it will be anticlimactic.

By then LENR devices will be ubiquitous and the science journals will only be giving their seal of approval to what the public had already been using for years.

This is an ENGINEERING process going on here, not normal science. It is 'hit and miss' experimentation that is a throwback to Edison's methods, not Tesla.

Does anyone have any results from yesterdays test yet?

LOL, I misread your post, never mind!

Heindl, I don't think the primary effort here is to get results in a way that is air-tight nonfraudulent.

Like any experiment, we have to trust the experimenters (whose specs are being published) that they realize peer review will confirm or deny any fraud inherently as part of the normal scientific process.

The scientific process itself will affirm that this is genuine, unlike Rossi who is understandably trying to protect a proprietary interest instead of proving the validity of his apparatus in a purely scientific process.

if there is a period for counter-considerations, then the rejection isn't exactly 'final', is it?

I bet that AC unit on the wall is cranked up to the max.

Can you imagine how hot it gets in there?

But I am under the impression that Rossi has a lot of stock in IH, doesn't he?

And with the money he will make on this, maybe he is ready for retirement anyway?