You only get a non zero Poynting vector for time varying electric and magnetic fields that have the same source and obey Maxwell's Equations.
Incorrect… Static fields also obey Maxwells equations, and hence also have a non-zero Poynting vector.
You only get a non zero Poynting vector for time varying electric and magnetic fields that have the same source and obey Maxwell's Equations.
Incorrect… Static fields also obey Maxwells equations, and hence also have a non-zero Poynting vector.
The discovery leads one to amazing adventures and great talks with other thinkers, inventors and much much more. That process of discovery is so much better than just learning/accepting what others did!
Sounds great - in theory.
But in reality, it seems your only “progress” was to get hung up on misinformation, science fiction and various conspiracy theories… Be it vaccines, contrails, Putin apologetics, or the Velikovsky affair.
To be specific, vaccinated 80-year-olds die at the rate of 10.93 per week per 100,000 people. Unvaccinated people age 49 die at 3.33/week. That's lower, right? Yes, but unvaccinated 80-year-olds die at 54.39/week.
It always amuses me that Wyttenbach thinks he is capable of understanding 4D nuclear structures, when has repeatedly demonstrated he is unable to understand the above.
I was looking up a recipe today and it called for a 1/2 teaspoon of asafoetida . Having never heard of this I looked it up and found this:
Oof! 1/2 a tsp is a lot… the clue is in the name: asa-foetid-a. Make sure to shallow fry it until it starts smelling more pleasant…
if someone does take some heed to a simple statement or claim, and looks into it, It does wonders for understanding what is going on here
I looked into this claim…
Hint - The thick broad engines of planes are designed to NOT leave a trail, look it up.....
…and decided you were probably talking nonsense. Although if you have any links that suggest otherwise, I’d be interested to read them.
Actually, it was my daughter who told me that….
It's clear that you know nothing about the U. S. Wyoming has a low population… A local grid connection could not handle that. A dedicated high tension line to somewhere was required…. Before you criticize people do the research.
There’s people living in caves in Afghanistan who understand that Wyoming has a tiny population, and it should be obvious to anyone that a local grid can’t handle a 0.5GW windfarm. But let us not get bogged down with those, and your other, obfuscations.
Originally you claimed that “the [Rolling Hills] power goes to California (L.A)”… As if some special HT line joined the two places.
When I read that (instead of relying on some air-headed comment from my own daughter) I searched for a map of the US power grid. I think this counts as “doing the research”, but I suspect that, for obvious reasons, you aren’t really in a position to judge.
It seems Rolling Hills has five HT interconnects, which spread the power all over the Western and Midwestern US. Some of it - or more accurately - what is left after passing through Salt Lake City, San Francisco, and Las Vegas, eventually arrives in Los Angeles.
Quite different from your claims.
I must say, I’m surprised this needs explaining to an electrical engineer. Especially one who emphasises the necessity of “doing the research”…
So can be wind power distribution. In 2017 I visited my daughter in Rolling Hills, Wyoming. One morning I went out and counted the number of windmills I could see. I got up to 100. I was surprised to learn that the power went to California (L. A.). Get out a map and figure out the line losses for that transmission.🤠
Who told you that?! The local cafe owner? Are you suggesting that Rolling hills has its own special HV link to Los Angeles?
This isn’t how power grids work. Whilst California imports a fair amount of its electricity, the above statement is overly simplistic.
You can do a country by country comparison with the % of renewables on the Y axis and the retail price of electricity on the x-axis. Then you do the regression and you can see the R^2 and correlation. If your hypothesis is correct that wind and solar are much cheaper sources of power then the regression should show a general decrease in retail prices as the share of wind and solar increase in a given country.
Whilst it’s commendable that you have researched some actual data to bolster your argument, the above comment displays a deep misunderstanding of statistics.
The graph you posted shows R^2 = 0.125! (I think… it’s pretty blurry) if that is the case, a more accurate conclusion would be to say that 87.5% of the variability in energy prices is caused by factors other than those considered in your hypothesis.
In other words, you’ve managed to turn a second or third order effect into a headline. 3/10. Must try harder.
(As a aside, I’ll bet if you removed Germany from your analysis, your regression line would be effectively horizontal).
I got lucky with the Ramada, it has just opened.
Are you sure about that? Google has received a consistent stream of reviews about the place for the last 6 years.
Zeus46 , read again please.
Ok, I will.
The airfare and hotel costs were much lower than I was advised
we all helped him with locations and rate, so as to ensure not a penny will be wasted, please knock it off with the cheap criticism.
Curbina, please explain what I’m missing?
…Other than some advisors who appear to have been using guesswork instead of Google - and then dismissing any corrections as “cheap criticism”.
For me - well my darling wife died after a 'flu jab' which went seriously wrong.
This is the exact same reason my mother-in-law is an antivaxxer.
For some reason she discounts her husbands stage four lung cancer as being the cause his death.
Well done Alan, you shall go to the ball!
We who know and collaborate daily with Alan Smith are aware he budgeted as low as reasonably possible and we all helped him with locations and rate, so as to ensure not a penny will be wasted, please knock it off with the cheap criticism.
Cheap criticism, Curbina? Prescient, I would say.
and the cheapest rooms in the Silicon Valley are 4-$500 night.
You sure about that?
Why is crypto preferable to a scientist simply starting an LLC?
Because with crypto you can avoid a lot of the securities and investment laws that prevent the naive being taken advantage of.
(Disclaimer: I own a lot of Bitcoin)