What does the Santilli telescope image with two concave lenses? Total internal reflection of the observers mind state?
Don't be facetious... it sees antimatter and/or aliens.
Zeus46
Member
- Member since Sep 22nd 2016
Posts by Zeus46
-
-
-
>> 3. This new virus is not heat-resistant and will be killed by a temperature of just 26/27 degrees.
Thankfully i'll be alright then...
-
Or it could be measuring the sag in the mirror support to a very high degree of accuracy.
-
England's population density is 82% of Japan's. Yet as far as I know, the rich twits there still hunt foxes, not excess people.
'Tis true. Although nowadays only by "accident", to (mostly) avoid legal troubles.
Netherlands didn't invent Kamikadze, Japanese did.
-
You might not agree worh Madoff, but you have to acknowledge: a) He was pretty good at what he did, and b) One should diversify one's investments.
-
Because the Daily Mail is such a bastion of journalistic rigour.
Well it is important to know what Kate and Meghan have been wearing.
-
Origin is not CNN but CCN. That is how fakes are created.
-
Please show me exactly where I said that in those words... hic... If it's indeed a "repeated" assertion, locating it should be simple.
If you can't find the quote, stop saying I wrote that!
I reckon it's time to cough up that hundy, SOT...
How much power and what signal to noise (output to input power) ratios are we talking about?
Maybe Celani can give a talk about why he can't use ten wires instead of one (with the same heater) to get a better signal to noise ration (COP).
Yes, the heater would thus be more efficient and the signal to noise ratio (COP) would be much higher...
You need high output, low input (a high signal to noise ratio) and long duration to make the case for...
Of course. But another solution would be to design an experiment which has such a large absolute power level and signal to noise ratio (Pout/Pin) that Shanahan-type errors can't significantly affect it.
What's your favourite charity Jed?
-
And if you want to know why these micro-ball lightnings with double layers are responsible for the creation of life and the processes taking place in our cells...
The same process that created life and sustains our cellular functions and powers LENR will also be how we travel to the stars.
You're tripping hard 'Director', nowhere in that paper do they suggest that this is the case. Never mind offering any sort of proof. If this is the standard of your science 'reporting', I'm glad for the time saved by previously ignoring it.
-
That's basically a list of people upon whom the burden of proof squarely lies/laid.
-
I agree, and in more general terms too. Anyone's pet theory, is just that, and by acknowledging this, their credibility improves. In my opinion...
Yes their maths may work out nicely, or its a nice story that makes logical sense to them, but the burden of proof is firmly upon them, and until they, or others, have provided that evidence, and it's been assessed by suitably qualified people. I reckon (for their own sake) they'd be better off being far more humble.
-
Medical ethics in particular. Remember the 'I didn't delete the post' HIPAA/Papp affair? Morals looser than a four year old's shoelaces..
-
Careful now Zeus46 . You are talking about a colleague of mine.
Then hoping, for your sake, he's changed his spots.
-
Strictly my opinion; "name removed's" attention has shifted back to focus on Ocean seeding to save the planet. Those "lovely gammas", must not be as attractive as the allure, and potential of the sea:
Another busted flush from the shameless hype-merchant?
Saw that one coming.
-
And Seven_of_twunty, apparently.
-
I am not the one to tell You what to do.
If I was, my advice should be already as clear as common sense.
Lolool!! Welcome back Clarifier / damn_right_man / IobsteRboy.
Same old shtick, and still as cranky as ever, I see.
I'm betting your fifth? incarnation doesn't make it till Easter. Maybe not even Valentine's day?
-
again an hypothetical scenario that in no way can be applied to the configuration reported.
Let us not allow facts get in the way of a good red herring.
You won't find it now because the entire thread was deleted by the site administrators because of something to do with Russ George.
I think it was more to do with what Mike McKubre called Russ George. (Obnoxious & untrustworthy IIRC).
-
Yeah. Because they have shown nothing which is both credible and impressive.
Other than their three independent reports, which its fairly obvious, you haven't read.
You not being able to tell the difference between the third report and a summary of it, and your long and inglorious history of never reading anything long or technical, are the giveaways here.
-
