- Member since Sep 22nd 2016
Posts by Zeus46
-
-
Hey Hhuxxleyy, maybe I like a little Socratic discussion at times, but have you never noticed that I don't advance any arguments or seek to persuade anybody of anything. I doubt anyone even knows my opinions on many regularly discussed topics here. Of course, people think they do, but that's another story, which only involves them.
Of course you haven't noticed, as you're too busy constantly broadcasting your own predictable opinions* to all and sundry!
And at least make an effort to spell my name properly. You literally get it wrong more than half the time. So I don't care if you think that "I look bad", as your powers of observation are evidently horrendous! What else of mine are you misreading?
Harrass? (sic) Mary? Mary is free to block me if heshe pleases. In fact, I encourage it. I block plenty of people whose posts I don't care to read. You should try it too, it cuts out a lot of guff.
And one more thing: Guess what, fool, this is the playground... home of the off-topic pressure-release... Don't like it, don't visit it! People without a sense of humour aren't welcome anyway.
Indeed, by your own account, all you've really achieved here is a off-topic addition to the whatever you deemed off-topic in the first place... Excellent work old boy.
* Which to be fair, are interspersed between plenty of logic and facts, although in my opinion this can only increase the pernicious nature of such. There's many good reasons why I write (and say) In My Opinion to preface such...
-
Thanks Kirk, interesting stuff re. tritium, helium, dendrites etc.
Re. LENR-CANR.org, I'd like to read your final unpublished journal letter rebutting (Marwan et al)? I've heard it said (probably by Abd) that this means et al had the last word, and hence must have 'won' the argument in the eyes of the editors. Surely no copyright issues too.
-
It's pretty funny to be accused of insulting people above. Yes, I called you a name, but really (a) you are one, and (b) it's barely an insult.
Compare that to what's come out of your filthy mouth in the last four weeks:
you are too lazy or too dumb... so feeble minded... an unspeakable asshole... a cowardly piece of subhuman slime... human excrement... infantile moron... individual ayhole... A worse piece of human excrement I can not imagine... low life sewer-dwelling asswipe... a subhuman piece of crap below the level of trailer trash.
Which is truly fascinating, if only because seeing it all at once gives a great insight into your character. Freud would no doubt consider you to have been too harshly punished during your potty training, leading to a lifelong anal fixation, but then, Freud was a weirdo: I reckon you just have a scat fetish?
And what's with you calling people 'subhuman' all the time, you know that word has a pretty terrible history, right?
-
Oh yes. God help us if you ever made a single contribution other than sarcasm and insults
Pot calling kettle... You deserve little else.
Very true...
A bit rich Zorud, considering anyone can have a look through your posting history.
-
My report was requested by the FBI including original video and was used by the SEC to put Sniffex out of business.
Are you saying you bought an actual Sniffex device, tested it, and made a video of that?
How's Rossi working for you these days, Zeus? Still love Defkalion perhaps?
What on earth are you talking about? You're obsessed with both of those to the point where you imagine everyone must support them. Find a quote of mine that offers blind support to either, or STFU.
-
Now we also know that electrochemical loading is equivalent to very high pressure gas loading, and we have a proposal out there for something called superabundant vacancies, i.e. ordered arrays of holes in the metal, that serve as bubble nucleation sites, as could these contaminant concentration points, formed by high pressure loading. In any case, once the loading gets high, the internal pressure of these bubbles (caused by molecular hydrogen forming in the holes) can exceed the yield stress and 'pop'.
Interesting. Is a rough upper limit on the size of these SAVs typically noticed? How many planes would a single SAV typically form in?
New elements? Are you sure? They weren't there to begin with, maybe hiding? I generally assume these are contaminants present in the starting materials, possibly there when the materials were purchased or introduced later accidentally. To assume they come from LENRs is a wild-eyed hope by CF believers.
You see, metallurgists know that contaminants in metals can be well-dispersed or concentrated in local spots.Of course one has to assume contaminants are present, but having been taught and then studied more than than my fair share of metallurgy, I have still come across a handful of LENR papers/slides that in my opinion show features that are wholly incongruous with any mass transport mechanisms that I know of, or believe could reasonably exist.
-
If I missed something about Dardik, what was it?
Is that just a veiled attempt at requesting a further spoon-feeding?
-
But, unlike the lot of you, I am quite open to the possibility that I am wrong.
I always find it weird when 'skeptics' make claims of their own mind-reading abilities. Kind of gives their game away, eh?
Now, what support do you garner from the data that suggests a HATER elf is active?
He also blasted some strange-looking exit wounds in the electrodes, made some new elements, and produced a little bit of radiation.
Only elfs do that.
-
-
-
-
I should probably have written 'sense of caution', I got a little caught up in rearranging your parlance.
That in turn leads to a CCS because of the specifics of the cell design.
That in turn leads to a theoretical, or hypothesised, CCS... Possibly better referred to as a/the CCSH. A label you seem to reject?
-
Their objections were many, but mainly based on two complaints. First what was suggested was radical, and had never been seen anywhere. That is a definite cause for caution.
Then I pop up with the CCS/ATER effect/mechanism, which is pretty solid. No new physics, a little [never been seen anywhere] chemistry.
You lump yourself in the same box IMO, by seeming to display little 'cause for caution'. Why not refer to ATER as the hypothesis that it is? The word 'mechanism' is generally reserved for a tangible, understood process.
-
I "uncovered" Sniffex's extremely dangerous and lethal fraud in 2006.
The US military actually uncovered it in 2005. They even wrote a report about it... Late to the party as usual Yugo?
-
Et tu Huxleyy? Always had you down as a reader.
-
... A distinct possibility, based on your ignominious Celani 'single wire' episode (and similarly, on your reply to Ascoli).
-
-
Could you please provide a link to those other papers for the devices that ran unpowered for a day or two? Also one of the papers (hopefully the best one) showing excess heat of >100W sustained for 3 months with input power? Thanks.
... Which will shortly be dismissed as "miscellaneous crap", if the precedent set by the first few posts continues.
-
The ATER I propose was novel, no one I know of had thought of that. What I had seen described is where some of the dissolved metals (the basic electrolyte dissolves a little of the Pt and Pd electrodes) are dried onto the cell walls as droplets that splash up dry out. Then the hydrogen metallizes the metals and makes nano-sized metal clusters, which catalyze recombination just like a regular recombination catalyst.
But this doesn't apply to the Roulette paper, as a constant flow of condensation would stop the cell walls from drying out.