Tell me who killed dozens of million people by hunger.
Holodomor
Stalin killed an estimated 7.5M by starvation in Ukraine, 3+M in Kazakhstan
by some estimates 10M in the USSR.
oldguy
Member
- Member since Oct 1st 2016
- Last Activity:
Posts by oldguy
-
-
Well, as I'm an honest guy operating on my own dollar they should believe me. But if people don't want to they can do so. I'm not seeking validation from anybody here, just sharing some information.
And I invited you to visit. That's serious, inconvenient maybe, but serious.
You are in the UK, right?
Will you be going to ICCF22, perhaps I will track you down there and we can have lunch or something.
-
That tells us nothing about the calorimetry
yes, I see nothing that says much about how the measurements are done or anything like that. You might want to write it up with just running a few control samples and presenting it as a calorimetry device with details about your procedures and protocols. You don't have to "give away" your "secret formulas" but you might get people to take you a little more seriously if you discuss you calorimetry you are using. sensitivity, repeatability, variation between you devices in your array using the same control sample, etc.
As it is, I see little to thing you are serious with your measurements.
-
thanks
hope you get to present it sometime ----- ICCF22?
-
Well, we have periods where the COP is infinite - heat out and no power in. That's hard to beat.
where can I find a description of you system?
-
Knowing that AR promised to give the majority of the money to children with cancer, it seems that he could strike a deal with his customers to pay part directly to those charities for the customer's tax write off. .... that is if he really had customers and if he was telling the truth about being charitable. Of course it could just all be Rossi says... and we know how truthful that has proven.
-
Shane, does that mean you don't believe Rossi's claims of sales of (half a dozen??) systems about 5 years back and the one of the top 10 international companies buying his latest heat generator with the add incentive of free puppets. Not to mention is robotic factories turning out hundreds of systems.
I just had to ask that.
No- me neither.
-
first to cross the finish line.
and what exactly is the
"finish line" -
So, you are saying you can't afford a few hundred diamonds. Excuses, excuses!
-
Rossi be listed on the "Who's Who" list of LENR players
I am trying to recall - didn't Rossi try to say his method was not LENR or cold fusion?
Did he even claim he was system was based on LENR?
-
Bezos, Gates, Buffett, Musk.
I would think that Carl Page would show (he was at 21).
-
the 4 billion valuation of IH
Where do you get the 4B number. I cannot find the share price, number of shares out (22M?) or how to buy any. Woodford's total market cap is only around 8B
-
All this talk about old stuff that was over when Rossi dropped his case. == The only thing I think it is good for is for to let Rossi supporters misdirect attention away from the failed and poorly conducted condo demo - away from faulty measurements and lack of other measurements and the lack of real customers that he claimed he had from among the world's top 10 companies. Face it, his offer, if ever existed, was a failure, his demo was a failure, his suit to try to win 200M was a failure, his thermoelectric chips were failures, his waste treatment was a failure, his gold smuggling was a failure,...... What has he accomplished that actually has a positive observable result for anyone else other than taking money away from other LENR researchers for his own pockets.
-
I am confussed by these claims of offers posted in some obsure blog.
Who is this "Ruby Shale" that claims an offer was made? Is that a real person, a person claiming to be Ruby, a sock puppet, a post in a Rossi controlled blog posted by a Rossi employee, who knows.
Does this Ruby person (if real and not a misrepresentation of someone) have the right to make an offer on behalf of IH?
What were the terms of this alleged offer?
I am with Jed on this. Some statement by someone on a blog controlled by Rossi is not proof of an offer.
True the statement that someone claimed there was an offer on a blog is evidence that the blog said something but there it is not proof that an offer was actually made by IH or one of its approved delegates.
If is was otherwise, we would be seeing all kinds of "offers" in obscure blogs by posters with unproven identity ,
.... like "General Electric has offered me $10M for using their light bulbs". ....then, If I don't get my money I will sue them.
-
Display More
Did You read ? Recently Rossi wrote, that he has a HIGH TECH COMPANY.
- That's why he told us, that its e-cat can produce heat, electricity and thrust, abvout 2 years go ???
- That's why they never again told us, if they reached the Carnot cycle ???
- That's why we never ever again heard of the gasturbine attempt ???
- That's why their device look like a crappy piece of garage garbage screwed together by a child ???- That's why no one could even see his upper body and head during the "SK demo" ???
This is "HIGH TECH" ???
Ou, I am not quite sure, but I start to believe, that Rossi suddenly but surely is loosing his mind....remember he claimed his customer was one of the top 10 larges global companies.
-
spectrum- how was the spectrum calibrated? As with all of Rossi's "demos" there seems a lack of control or calibration. Could the device be "off calibration" so that 420nm was really 530nm or something like that?
for example the use of an incorrect diffraction grating?
-
OH by the way, I view the "demo from the condo" to be very very poor (laughable). A good one should use multiply redundant measures of all critical data and use separate physical methods to do so. It should also use a control working at the same level as the claimed effect and all raw data should be made available. “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” (ECREE- Carl Sagan)
-
IO one easy accessible list of F and P style experiments is : https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CravensDtheenablin.pdf
It lists many of them (160+) and various characteristics that were similar or different from FP.
From my view, the point is that "replication attempts" that were closer to the original are more
likely to yield positive results and those that missed some criteria were less likely to see excess heat.
-
Note to self:
don't feed the trolls just block them and
spend more time in the lab actually doing science.
-
covered that 6-cylinder thing in the other thread
and you were wrong then too
see guarantee performance in agreement:
payment was "contingent on a six-cylinder Hot Cat"
and all energy measures were to be on energy flow in and out of a six-cylinder unit.
Read the agreement.
Unless you find a written agreement (required also by contract) signed by ALL parties, then there could be no
alterations from the agreed upon six cylinder unit.
