Posts by David Nygren

PARKHOMOV's THIRD PRESENTATION.

The complete presentation is in Russian at: https://yadi.sk/i/zTRxBwVofYmaE

There are errors in this translation. Report them by commenting here. Please also [email protected] if you can Russian language and want to help.

AGP-3

Results of the long-time testing of the new variant of the analog of thermogenerator of Rossi
By Alexander Georgevich Parkhomov.

The experiments with the devices similar with Rossi’s thermogenerator- about which I spoke at the previous seminars have shown that the mixtures of nickel and aluminum hydride heated in a hermetically closed ceramic tube to temperatures over 1100 C effectively prodice heat, significantly more than the used energy.
But the working time of these reactor is too short to produce measurable isotopic changes and also to show that the release of the excess heat is caused by cold nuclear transmutations.
For achieving longer continuous work durations we had to change much the construction of the reactor. First of we had to
Renounce to the calorimertry used based on the measurement of the quantity of evaporated water because it is difficult to ake all day addition of water.
The construction of the reactor for long time work.
The tube of the reactor aimed for long time work is 29 cm long and so only its central part is heated. Due to low thermal conductivity of the ceramic he ends of the tube are not very warm (at 1200 C in the center the ends are not warmer that 50C; this allows the use of epoxy adhesive for closing the tube.
For heating we have used resistor Х23Ю5Т (Kanthal A1)
That is working up to 1400 C.
The fuel mixture (640 mg Ni + 60 mg LiAlH4 is in a container of thin stainless steel. For displacing the air from the tube we have used ceramic filling/liners.
The manometer with a limit of measurement of 25 bars is connected with the reacor with a thin tube of stailess stel.

Reactor during testing
Heating of reactor to working temperature.
Measuring pressure during the heating process
The increase of pressure starts around 100 C. Maximum pressure of appr 5 bar was attained at 189C after this pressure starts to fal and at 900C is smaller than atmospheric. Greatest decrease ( 0.5 bar) at 1150 C then starts to increase slowly to atmospheric.

Heating reactor to working temperature
The temperature 0f 1200C at the surface of he working tube was attained in 12 hours of stepwise increase of power of the electrical heater up to 630W. After this the power necessary to maintain the temperature of 1200C decreases in 1 hour to 330W
The power of heating during almost 4 days till the burning out of the heater
For almost 3 days the power necessary to maintain the temperature of the reactor tube at 1200C was in the limits of 300-400W. Before the burning out, the power started to incresase and at burning out it was at 600W
The burning out was caused by stepwise oxidation of the resistor.

Working of the reactor with the new heater
The temperature of 1200C was maintained with using the power of heater of 500-700W.

The power necessary for maintaining the given temperature.

At temperatures over 700 C the reactor with fuel consumes less electrical energy than that necessary for the reactor with no fuel. This shows the presence of a heat source besides the electrical heater.
For heating to the temperature of 1200 C the power necessary for reactor with no fuel is 1100 W, for reactors with fuel first we need 650W and after an hour 300- 330 W.
From this we can evaluate that the excess heat is 800W. The thermal coefficient COP is 1100/330= 3.3
But this is only a rough estimate not considering the differences between processes of thermo-generation with and without fuel.

When there is no internal heat source, the temperatures outside and inside are the same and the temperature measured with the thermocouple is equal with the tempeaure measured with the temperature of the surface of the heater.
When the reactor works with fuel a thermal flux is started from inside to outside that leads to a temperature gradient. Therefore the temperature measured with the thermocouple is greater than the temperature of the surface of the heater.
At the temperature of 1200C in the proximity of the thermocouple the temperature of the surface of the heater is 1070 C. Thus so the reactor produces only the heat necessary without fuel to heat to 1070C that is 800W and not 1100.
The thermal coefficient is COP= 800/330=2.4.

Container with fuel after extraction of the tube of the reactor. Sided by ceramic inserts.

Fuel after extraction from the container.

Image of the used fuel at optical microscope.

Conclusions.

1. The apparatus worked continuously for more than 3 days, producing more than twice as much as the applied electrical energy. 50 kWh or 18MJ were produced in excess of the electrical energy expended. This amount of energy could be obtained by burning 350g of petroleum products.
2. The reactor chamber pressure during slow burning was relatively low (in this experiment up to 5 bar)
3. The used fuel had the appearance of soft droplets of golden color mixed with grey powder.
4. The resultant used fuel mixture was sent for analysis of atomic and isotopic composition. But the results, unfortunately, have not yet been received.

[lexicon]Alexander Parkhomov[/lexicon] presentations. Translating will come - [email protected][email protected]

MFMP Facebook

Quote

Parkhomov speaks

The Headline... "Produced power is at least tens times more than chemically possible, so this is some nuclear or yet unknown power"

Congratulations AGAIN!

URGENT VERIFICATION NEEDED - we are working hard to provide that verification.

The clincher will have to come later... "The fuel and ash has been sent for elemental and isotopic evaluation but the results are unfortunately not available at this time."

Key slides

http://bit.ly/1BuS2PC

Parkhomov had used a technique we had considered. By making the tube long, cheap epoxy can be used to seal the reactor tube as the ends are just 50ºC. We saw in our *GlowStick* and 'Bang!' reactor the big temperature differential between the hot part and the cool ends and had considered this approach, but the Swageloks worked, Parkhomov just went right on to the next level of simplicity, respect.

The fuel and ash has been sent for elemental and isotopic evaluation but the results are unfortunately not available at this time.

Ilya Safyannikov is doing translations here:

http://bit.ly/1BORHpP

Display More

Fusion Power: Within Our Grasp? – Talk by Steve Cowley, 21 April | 25/03/2015Find out how nuclear fusion could power your world in the future – from one of the leading experts in the field. Professor Steve Cowley will be the speaker at Didcot Café Scientifique at the Cornerstone Arts Centre on Tuesday 21 April at 7.30pm.

Professor Cowley is Director of Culham Centre for Fusion Energy and will talk about the research underway here at CCFE. With concerns over climate change and the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels, the hunt for alternative sources of energy is crucial, and nuclear fusion could play a huge role.

“Nuclear fusion is the perfect way of getting energy apart from one thing: it’s really hard to get right,” says Professor Cowley. “But we’re well on the way with experiments like JET and MAST at Culham – it’s really important that we have fusion for the future as there aren’t many other options out there.”

Fusion Power: Within Our Grasp? is a special Café Scientifique event in association with Didcot First and Culham Centre for Fusion Energy. It is part of the ‘Making a Sun on Earth’ art and photography exhibition that CCFE is currently running at the Cornerstone.

Tickets for the talk cost £2.50 and can be booked from the Cornerstone box office on 01235 515144 or at:

http://www.ccfe.ac.uk/news_detail.aspx?id=318

http://www.cornerstone-arts.or…on-power-within-our-grasp

Lithium arrives at the epicenter of robust LENR

1. The Rossi Lugano report was issued on October 10, 2014. It was troubling in that Rossi had control of the fuel powders. The analysis suggested that Ni-58 was converted to Ni-62. Also Lithium-7 was converted to Li-6. We know that Rossi had access to Li-6 and Ni-62 powders. He could have easily ‘salted’ the reactors before or after a run.

The analysis concludes that Rossi had added 100milligrams of LiAlH4 as a source of hydrogen gas. The system apparently produced excess heat, but the pyrometry seemed designed to confuse. As a result the report was nearly worthless.

2. John Wallace releases his new book on quantum mechanical revisions and identifies liquid metal lattices to be superior to solid nickel and/or palladium lattices. The liquids have a high defect density as compared to solids and the defects have been associated with excess heat. Molten lithium is the best choice.

3. [lexicon]Alexander Parkhomov[/lexicon] releases data stating that LiAlH4 added to Ni-255 powders did give 1000 Watts excess heating.

4. Parkhomov has essentially resurrected the Lugano/Rossi data with this replication.

5. A Journal article from Italy on March 18 detailed how lithium has anomalous nuclear crossection

6. In 1952 Nobel lecture by Cockcroft stated that Lithium was a singular substance with unexplained Properties.

H. Ikegami

1. ULTRADENSE NUCLEAR FUSION IN METALLIC LITHIUM LIQUID He shows how lithium is many, many orders of magnitude more active with its nuclear properties. An enormous enhancement of 7Li(d,n2) reaction rate in liquid Li was reported by H.

Ikegami et al.[8].

They bombarded metallic Li targets in both liquid and solid phase with deuterium ion beams at the energy range of some tens of keV. In solid phase, no event was observed with the alpha-particle and neutron detectors, which was consistent with the reaction rate estimation based on the published nuclear cross-section data. On the other hand, in the liquid phase, a large number of -particles were observed on the SSD. Consequently, the rate enhancement of 7Li(d,n2) reaction was estimated to be a factor of 1010 - 1015. In 2013 Minari working at another Japanese lab repeated his work with lower reaction crossections, but still with remarkable properties.

2. Quantum Rabbit Corp has been doing transmutation studied for 10 years. They use an arc to create strong B-field in molten lithium. They transmute iodine into Selenium Molten lithium seems to be looming as the flux to obtain kilowatt power levels. This is totally unexpected until one examines the body of evidence. Lithium-6 represents only 7% with Li-7 is at 93%.Lithium-6 may be the most important entity in LENR.In fact, Efimov States explain the anomalies of Li-6 in a qualitative manner. Li-6 acts like three boson pairs. This delocalizes the nuclear binding dimensions and entirely new physical effects are enabled.

During the Swedish seminar ‘Gräv’ on investigative journalism this weekend, Ulrika Björkstén , head of the scientific news team at Swedish National Radio SR, and free-lance journalist Marcus Hansson, were awarded an honorary mention at the prestigious investigative journalism award ‘The Golden Shovel’ (Guldspaden), by the Swedish Association for Investigative Journalism, FGJ.

https://www.facebook.com/Veten…/1018244151537095/?type=1

Björkstén and Hansson received the award for a four part reportage on Cold Fusion, the E-Cat and Andrea Rossi called ‘The Blind Belief in Cold Fusion’ (English transcription here 1, 2, 3, 4). A comment on the reportage by Mats Lewan can be found here.

The motivation of the Golden Shovel Jury was: “For having broken new ground in science journalism in an engaging way”.

The reportage was broadcasted in May 2014. Notably, SR avoided to report on the Lugano report a few months later, where clear amounts of excess heat and isotopic changes in the fuel were observed after a 32-day run of the E-Cat by the same researchers who were criticized in the reportage. The measurement was supported by the Swedish utility research institute Elforsk.

Also to be noted is this remark in the last part by Björkstén, who holds a PhD in physical chemistry:

“…because there are four very clear warning flags. The first, that made us decline reporting on this, is this cold fusion story. It is an area where there repeatedly since 1989 have been these people claiming that they have cold fusion, and it has never been proven to be true. And as you usually say, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. There is no reason to report on such experiments until there is credible evidence.”

Since the Science Radio at SR is considered to have high credibility, the reportage has made it difficult for other Swedish media to report on cold fusion and the E-Cat story.

If you have opinions on this reward, it could be a good idea to make a comment.
Follow the links to Swedish Radio.

Facebook Page
Twitter
Youtube

Youtube

This is great news for the field, step by step we get more proof from the market

Quote from FreethinkerLenr2

Henry,

What is your aim? You seem so personally invested.

Alain has an opinion about GSVIT. Anybody who know who they are have an opinion. Big deal.
Alain is spending some time to keep a watchful eye on this subject. He share and disseminate information.

What be your contribution in this?

Seriously. Drop it. It is not contributing to anything worth while at this point.

Display More

Agree with you

Russian video with Alexander, March 18.

Interview from Italian radio with Bo Höistad, Professor at Department of Physics and Astronomy, Nuclear Physics.

No news for nerds, compilation 2014-2015 for new visitors.

Elforsk Oct 2014
www.elforsk.se/LENR-Matrapport-publicerad/

Bill Gate Nov 2014
http://www.infinite-energy.com…azine/issue119/gates.html

Alexander Parkhomov papers - Jan 2015
Parkhomov Paper 2015 01 29 English.pdf

Who is actually doing a replication attempt?
Summary: Who is actually doing a replication attempt?

ICCF19 - April 2015
http://iccf19.com

If you need motivation! Please watch this video from 2014.

Forbidden Energy - Barry Thompson - 2014 Winner

Publicerades den 2 juni 2014
Each year, corporate leaders, philanthropists, heads of innovation and XPRIZE Trustees gather for a multi-day Visioneering meetup to brainstorm, debate, and prioritize which of the world's Grand Challenges might be solved through incentivized competition.

http://xprize.org

https://herox.com/
---------------------------------------
ABOUT XPRIZE

XPRIZE is an educational (501c3) nonprofit organization whose mission is to bring about radical breakthroughs for the benefit of humanity, thereby inspiring the formation of new industries and the revitalization of markets that are currently stuck due to existing failures or a commonly held belief that a solution is not possible. XPRIZE addresses the world's Grand Challenges by creating and managing large-scale, high-profile, incentivized prize competitions that stimulate investment in research and development worth far more than the prize itself. It motivates and inspires brilliant innovators from all disciplines to leverage their intellectual and financial capital.

Hello frends , what you ask for will come. At this time there are more questions than answers. I think those who have knowledge are working towards to our common goal.

Welcome Ugo Abundo, thanks for reporting.

Keep us updated.

Exciting @brian ahern ! Keep us updated

Very good! I add you to our translation group. Check pm

In this thread, we post news from Russia!

---

Dear Colleagues,
We inform you that on Wednesday 11/3/2015 at the Physics Department of Moscow State University
in the auditorium C-65.
meeting will be held Moscow Seminar "Physics of ball lightning and physico-chemical processes in long-lived high-energy plasma and objects" (Session number 42).
During the meeting 18.30 h.
The theme of the seminar:
1. Prof. AI Nikitin "Rossi Generator for pedestrians"

Everyone is welcome
The workshop
Dr. M. Sciences VL Bychkov
8-916 0257091
[email protected]

Bureau of the Seminar:
Prof. Y. Burtan
a. F.-AY Sciences Grjaznov
to Ph. D. Sciences VV Nizovtsev

Published March 10, 10:24

LINK

Great @FactBits

Only in Russian - Video presentation and workshop VNIIAES 05.03.2015g.
Alexander Shadrin "Processing of radioactive waste from the reactor via A.V.Vachaeva based LENR

Only in Russian, Presentation

What do we know about Journal of Unconventional Science?

Investigation of the heat generator similar to Rossi reactor A.G. Parkhomov

Abstract—This paper describes development and tests of a device that is similar to the well-known hightemperature Rossi reactor. The experiments confirmed that at the temperature about 1100◦C and more this device produces more energy than it consumes. Performed measurements demonstrated no ionized radiation above the background level from the working reactor.

The report of experts, who observed the work of the high-temperature Rossi reactor in Lugano [1], [2], indicated that the reactor might represent a ceramic tube, sealed by a heat-resisting cement, with a nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride addition. In order to initiate the reaction it is necessary to heat the tube up to 1200 – 1400 ◦C. Taking into account this report and making several assumptions, a device has been developed, which can be viewed as analogous to the high-temperature Rossi reactor.

I. Design of the devices Alumina ceramic tubes of 120 mm length with the outer diameter of 10 mm and the inner diameter of 5 mm have been used (Fig. 1). Nichrome wire was winded on the tube as an electric heater. 1 g of Ni powder with 0.1 g Li[AlH4] was placed inside the tube. The thermocouple contacted the outer surface of the tube. Both tube ends were sealed with the heat-resisting cement. The entire reactor’s surface was also coated by this cement.

II. Measurement of heat output The measurement method used by experts during the Rossis reactor test seems to be too complicated. In the described experiment we used another approach, based on the amount of water boiled away. This method is verified multiple times in various experiments, including experiments with plasma electrolysis. The reactor is placed in a closed metal vessel (Fig. 2), which is submerged in the water. Some amount of water is steamed away during the reactor’s work. Measuring the evaporated water and using the known heat of vaporization (2260 kJ/kg), allows calculating the produced heat. The heat loss through the thermal isolation can also be calculated by considering the cooling rate after the reactor is switched off.

-----

VII. Conclusions

Experiments with the replication of the hightemperature Rossi heat generator loaded by a mixture of Ni and lithium aluminum hydride demonstrated that these devices produce more energy than they consume at the temperature about 1100◦C and more. There was no ionized radiation above the background level observed while operating the reactor. Neutron flux density was not larger than 0.2 neutron/cm2 ·s.

http://www.unconv-science.org/en/n7/parkhomov/

Thanx @SERGEI