Posts by SERGEI

Muons are not catalysts for nuclear fusion. This is a separate class of nuclear reactions.

Quote from Shane D.

Ahlfors has dug up information indicating the Google Team has begun the follow-up up on their initial research: " data-translation="[пользователь='2391']Ahlfors [/user] откопал информацию, указывающую на то, что команда Google начала следить за своими первоначальными исследованиями: " data-type="trSpan">[пользователь='2391']Ahlfors [/user] откопал информацию, указывающую на то, что команда Google начала следить за своими первоначальными исследованиями: природа: финансируемые Google исследования не могут найти избыточную тепловую/ядерную сигнатуру. Обращается к сообществу LENR за советом!

Нам, возможно, придется начать новую, специальную нить, как наши Россия/Япония/Италия конкретные темы, чтобы отслеживать их усилия. Возможно переименовать этот поток с этой целью, если это не будет беспокоить Вас Сергей?

OK.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-019-0530-1

Why don't we read and discuss?

Reminds me; anyone know where SERGEI went? Have not seen him here in a while.

I'm here. What happened?

http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/…an-vodorod-titan-deiterii

https://universe-tss.su/main/n…nija-zhizni-na-zemle.html

The article has e-mail of the author: write your claims to him.

In Russian

Institute for Metals Superplasticity Problems RAS, 39 Khalturin St., Ufa, 450001, Russia

The main proof of fusion reactions of deuterium nuclei is the presence of nuclear reaction products. When detecting tritium after saturation of titanium powders with deuterium reproducible results of its high concentration have been found. Titanium powders of two different batches have been used. According to metallographic studies, powder # 1 had an average particle size of d = 110 ± 5 μm; lazer diffraction analyzer of particle sizes registered one more maximum near the size of d = 0.2 μm. Powder # 2 was a sifted fraction with sizes in interval 80 < d < 150 μm. For powder # 1 the measured concentrations of tritium amounted about cT = (11 – 14) ∙ 103 dpm and for powder # 2 cT = (1.45 – 1.57) ∙ 103 dpm, a concentration typical for deuterium used. An effect of the dispersity of initial titanium powder on the proceeding of nuclear reactions has been demonstrated. Earlier, a mechanism of interaction of deuterons in a metallic matrix by means of a resonance transfer of a neutron from one deuteron to the other has been proposed. One of the products of such an interaction is a tritium nucleus. Such a process can run in elongated defects. The cross dimension of such defects was not known, however. From an analysis of measurements of titanium powder particle sizes one can conclude that the optimum size of pores must be about d1 = 3 ∙ 10–8 m. During all experiments the levels of neutrons (Nn = 30 ± 2 1 / 50 sec) and gamma quanta (Nγ = 700 ± 15 1 / 5 sec) did not exceed the values typical for the room where experiments were carried out.

http://www.unconv-science.org/n23/

Quote from Shane D.

Google хочет, чтобы это привело к выводу. У нас есть 2 недели, чтобы сделать работу. Я позволял ему кипеть, с 2-3 месяца крайний срок в виду. Теперь пришло время стать серьезным, и объединить все это вместе, чтобы сформировать консенсус вокруг 2-3 из лучших.

Мне нужны наши квалифицированные исследователи...Каждый из вас. Больше никаких выкипаний, Эво, Росси, никаких фундаментальных исследований, только ваше квалифицированное мнение о том, какой эксперимент дает им лучший шанс доказать ЛЕНР. Перечитайте презентации ICCF21, последний коллоквиум MIT, чтобы освежить себя относительно того, что, возможно, было упущено. Если кто-то из вас в старой гвардии хочет отправить мне личное сообщение с вашим предложением, свяжитесь со мной через функцию "разговор". Я бы хотел, чтобы SERGEI перечислил свой лучший русский эксперимент для добавления в список.

Пожалуйста, не включайте Mizuno в качестве выбора. Причина в том, что у нас не будет твердых результатов от надежных репликаторов в течение нескольких месяцев, и это слишком поздно. Если что-то всплывает раньше, Google увидит это и примет во внимание. Так что давайте не увязать в неизвестном, а придерживаться известных. До сих пор я думаю, что это то, что у нас есть:

1. Группа Такахаши
2. Форсли / Моссье-Босс

3. Колер

4. Бури

5. Celani

Я хотел бы напомнить вам, насколько это важно. В случае успеха команда Google является билетом LENR в мейнстрим и приемлемостью. Это ваш шанс быть частью процесса планирования, и, надеюсь, книги по истории за то, что сыграли свою роль.

Display More

I think that from Russia it is possible to consider the work of Vitaly A. Kirkinskiy with saturation of palladium with deuterium from the gas phase: https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2631134.html

But we are still not finished. I am still interested in what Russia has to offer? There has been so much quality research going on there for decades, much of it with positive results. I would think if they took their 3 best, their "list" for Google, would rival our 3. SERGEI ?

Dear Shane D.! I expressed my opinion about it in #32:

SERGEI
Member

Likes Received111

• Saturday, 10:04 am

• +3

• #32

Gentlemen from Google!

Enough to engage in replication. Over the past 30 years, many cold fusion replications have been made. It is necessary to create design offices that will design and test existing devices for the production of heat, and especially electric energy. The number of these offices should be equal to the number of countries with developed nuclear power, so that cold fusion reactors could be planned to replace nuclear power and recycle accumulated nuclear waste.

Regards,

Sergei Tcvetkov.

Gentlemen from Google!

Enough to engage in replication. Over the past 30 years, many cold fusion replications have been made. It is necessary to create design offices that will design and test existing devices for the production of heat, and especially electric energy. The number of these offices should be equal to the number of countries with developed nuclear power, so that cold fusion reactors could be planned to replace nuclear power and recycle accumulated nuclear waste.

Regards,

Sergei Tcvetkov.

https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2660175.html

Quote from AlainCo

статья о реакторе Росси на русском языке

цитируется по http://lenr.seplm.ru/

https://zen.yandex.ru/media/de…-5c79d32df8046e00b3c5a111

ничего действительно нового, как я понимаю

Dear Alain! Article illiterate with mistakes, directed against cold fusion.

Alan, add me to your list. Sergei Tcvetkov (Sergey Tsvetkov until 2012)

Quote from Alan Smith

Кто-нибудь из наших русскоговорящих знает, что означает аббревиатура TEGEU ? ТЭГЭУ in Cyrillic.???

Thermal emission generating energy installation - ТермоЭмиссионная Генерирующая Энергетическая Установка (ТЭГЭУ)

No: working on a dacha is Growing vegetables, fruits and berries on your garden plot in the village or farming.

Review of applications will start November 1, 2018? - Realy 2018? May be 2019?

Quote from RobertBryant

hi SERGEI

I was interested in Ivan because he was a beneficiary/victim of the Soviet era

http://bourabai.kz/filimonenko/

I was wondering about Pons.. may be his father was from Ukraine like John Dash's.

There seems to be contradictory info about Ivan

Perhaps because of the Soviet era and its demise.

Any facts about the 1989-1992 period and what claims might be true. .?

External Content youtu.be

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Display More

Dear Robert Bryant!

See Stanley Pons's biography on Wikipedia. There this information isn't present. His father's name was Robert, and he was born in North Carolina in 1943. In 1970, he was 27 years old, and he could not even do secret work in Ukraine. I found an article in the technical journal "Inventor and innovator" # 1 for 1995, where this stupid idea of Stanley Pons was first expressed (see attached file). Filimonenko could not be unemployed in the USSR from 1974 to 1989. It was more like a disability pension. Because if you look closely at the video, you will see that Filimonenko instead of the left hand prosthesis. He told, that he was the one who had an accident during the tests and was pinned down by his left hand. And most likely him as chief designer was suspended from work and closed its design office. As far as I know, it didn't put, and placed in psychiatric hospital. It was in the USSR that this method of punishment was used. And since Filimonenko was associated with secret development, the best it can be isolated in a psychiatric hospital.

My opinion: from Filimonenko tried to make a priority of the USSR on cold nuclear fusion.