In spite of this success, our work was quickly stopped by the head of the French Atomic Energy Commission, and no further experiments were possible.
This brings me to think the big picture. I am not interested about any conspiracy, but it's a known fact that the Nuclear power development was driven by the need to build nuclear bombs. ie; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Pile-1
I have approached this whole Fusion issue through quite another angle, my path went from Gravitation via Fission to Fusion. It must be known, that QED can explain everything in physics, except gravity and radioactive decay.
So after I noted that the first, and up to now only Gravitation theory was principally correct, and the problem was merely the wrongly interpreted critics.
This is the theory;
And here's the way I sort it out.
So on the way I noticed tha Radioactive decay must have quite simple reasons. And Then I ended up working with planck constant and nucleus and so on. Then I suddenly realized that if this all is correct, then Fusion must be endothermic, and it actually even explains a lot of things better then the present theories; (ie. Entropy turning point, Sun corona) So I ended up wondering "But how the Hell the Hydrogen-bomb has worked then?"
And Immediately I noticed the very disapointing answer;
WE (humans) HAVE BUILD THIS SHIT, WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING WHAT WE ARE REALLY DOING!
-sorry about yellling- but it's quite important. And here we come to the "problem" with "LENR" research. At 1989 the world was in historical turning point. All those in power, had fears.
And ie. the developer of Tsar Bomb, must have known that they were not really knowing what they were doing.
He was the one who porposed tokamak. And "funnily enough" died 14.12.1989 just not to be able to have an "important speech" in congress. This was the timing.
It might be interesting to know the content of this speech. Anyhow, the truth can and will be found in the lab.
This paper in thread states clearly;
- the lack of a valid hypothis (page
- The production of neutrons (figure 1. Page
- No radioactivity (page 9, must mean Alpha, beta and gamma?)
- the lack of 5.48 MeV gamma (page 11)
My hypothesis is plain and simple. The electricity provided an oscillation on the particles
(page 10) and it started to simply fission the Deuterium in to parts. D -> H + n
and though this reaction is thought to releace a "binding energy" of 2.22 MeV, I think this is not true. I need to think a bit more about this particular case to continue....
Added with edit;
I wondered what might have really been triggered the proposed reaction, but after reading the Appendix A again, I noted that the phenomenon occured as following (page 10) ;
After some trials of electrolysis current (variation 40–10 mA/cm2) the amperage was set to 10 mA/cm2 for a night. During this time, about 16 h, the counts of Bonner sphere were the stable background. Then, the counts showed (Fig. 1) a surprising and roughly linear increasing during about 5 h, up to a level four times greater than background. Unfortunately, the experiment stopped because of a shutdown of the electric power in the laboratory, due to a thunder storm. About 30 min later, with the return of electric power, the counts were about at the same level, but they decreased rapidly to return to the background level in less than 2 h.
I mean my thought problem was, that simply because the atomic scale compered the experimental scale is in order of 108 "wrong" the development of these oscillations must take a lot of time. -and this was exactly what happened.
(This is actually also a further prove for my turbulence theory) As, what also happened, was that after this oscillation was disturbed, the process stopped, and was impossible to restore. (btw, The current must have been DC!?)