Director: I understand your sentiment. Perhaps what will help you to understand the others is what I have highlighted in bold above. Most people would say exactly the opposite.
Exactly. The evidence clearly shows that Rossi has no technology.
@Director, If you were an experienced engineer or research scientist this would be obvious to you. Not because of his fraudulent behavior, but because of his utterly incompetent scientific research behavior and even worse engineering behavior.
Engineers work overtime to test things, often to the point of breaking them to find their strengths and weaknesses.
Scientists work overtime to find fault with their theories and design rigorous and repeatable tests that can provide stronger evidence of their hypotheses to their knowledgeable peers.
Rossi, ever the attention seeker, spends hours daily blogging a lot of inconsistent and self-contradictory fantasies to titillate some slice of his ignorant but hopeful audience, uses shoddy stagecraft to create meaningless demonstrations that provide no evidence to support his extraordinary claims, and gets angry and belligerent when others identify faults with his "reactors" (e.g unfueled reactor with "high COP" by Darden in NC).
But please provide a description of Rossi's technology that should be recognized on it's own merits independent of Rossi's behavior. This would be helpful in supporting your assertion, as I have not been able to identify any such technology, as an accomplished engineer and research scientist.
The truth is that any powerful Ni-H system is going to be compared to Rossi's E-Cats.
I find this assertion to be self-evidently absurd. I am confident that were anyone able to actually devise a powerful Ni-H system, the last thing they would want is to be compared to or associated with Rossi's E-Cats.