A dozen or so is not many for decades of scientific work.
As reported...... https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7201810870
And this is just a partial list of papers up to 2012.
Note also the number of citations.
A dozen or so is not many for decades of scientific work.
As reported...... https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7201810870
And this is just a partial list of papers up to 2012.
Note also the number of citations.
Rossi would have to have the test done independently
There was even an ERV and even IH has done their own measures. But of course we have now understood your agenda.
Levi's famous experiment
Saint Mary of the Unbelievers, that old run was never published by Levi in any report. Instead Rossi had done many others runs even without Levi that had success.
I have seen around in the net that you had made a strict collaboration with Krivit a guy who is more then six years that is putting all his efforts to destroy Rossi,
Interesting to say Krivit seem a very good supporter of Lattice Energy LLC of Widom Larsen. So that why. A company that acts against another company. Probably in a not completely legal way.
Flow calorimetry is an absolute method that does not depend on calibrations
No this is absolutely incorrect
. That ball stacking display showed how 800% more KE was harnessed from essentially a linear system
NO NO NO NO.
This is out of any Physics.
Total Energy and momentum are conserved.
Kinetic Energy is 0.5mv^2 and momentum is mv.
This is just classical 101 Phsics. In case of particles you better use the relativistic formulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…E2%80%93momentum_relation
What in the world does it have to with the fact that Levi is an academic nonentity and is not deserving of the slightest prestige. I have no idea why UniBo keeps him on. I doubt he would have lasted five years in a US college or university of any repute.
Saint Mary Levi curriculum is online. He has in fact hundreds of international papers and as shown here he is also part of a CERN collaboration.
So answer yourself.
What I was wondering is why you attack just him ? Why not to attack the Swedes, or Widom or Larsen or Shrivastava or any other academic working in LENR ?
Are you envious?
Mary is obviously one of the persons with the clearest views in here.
infinite repetition of a statement ( like used in Nazi germany and now in the anti islam campaign )
So for you the most aggressive and repetitive anti LENR subject here, Saint Mary of the Unbelievers, is the most wise one.
Why not close the forum ? So that your own truth would remain in the net ?
I see also that for you who believes in Lenr, like Jed, after reading hundreds of papers, that Saint Mary is unable to read even if she pretend to have an ultra high level curriculum, is like the Nazi and of course every news about Islam Terrorism is a fake.
Your post is concluded by the most classical repetition without proofs
A lot of people in here should pay attention to this asdvanced, objective and critical perspective of how to evaluate some statements, that are presented like LENR is, especially by such fraudsters like Rossi.
a nice insult to Rossi. That is really a Nazi like repetition.
Moved from the E-Cat QX thread. Eric
I have a dozen or so papers I actually did the original research work for and wrote and for which I am principal author or one of less than four. I also authored several dozen technical reports (some with other authors, others alone) and some of my working life consisted of writing summaries and reviews of other records and reports for a concern which does not publish them but uses these internally. There are more than a hundred of those. I also wrote three book chapters in two different books and gave many talks at meetings. And I was on a university faculty and taught a course for a while.
Ohhhhhh what a curriculum ! Ohhhh what a beatiful mind Saint Mary of the Unbelievers !
Unfortunately behind a false name and without any proof we should conclude that yours is a Hoax or simply hallucination of your mind.
Generally people with a curriculum like you pretend to have, have no time to write in internet sewer like that.
Moved from the E-Cat QX thread. Eric
Yes, it was a big problem to be fixed... but now the electric bill has been paid.
Henry when you will stop trolling around ?
I think that nobody founds funny or interesting your writings.
Such a plasma relies on sustained imperfect conductivity to produce the required heat to form the plasma,
No. In order to produce an arc you just need a sufficiently high electric field.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_arc
see also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_breakdown
Is the high field that ionize the gas transforming it in a conductor.
Harnessing that collision momentum might actually mean this is a superchemical event rather than Nuclear.
Kev Energy and Momentum are two different things both conserved. Please do not confuse them !
Second, you have to look at other experiments too, and some of these produced as much heat as you get from burning ~20 kg of potato chips.
Jed potatoes are fried with oil or not ? This would certainly change the final energy output.
How we can name this new unit ?
BTW a serious reference of potato chip burning experiment : http://www.chemistryhow.com/?q=book/export/html/50
From that page potato chips have 4000 calories per gram !
As it seems there are several possibilities for generating neutrons cheaply
Check also this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dense_plasma_focus
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
Is there any date on that paper ? All references are of 1989 so I presume is dated 1990.
or the equivalent of 12 kg of potato chips, coming from a device weighing ~1 g.
Interesting Unit Jed ! I presume you refer to "the equivalent [energy content] of 12 kg".
I'd say the fact that a plasma is very good at producing light and heat radiation is an good indication in most circumstances its a rather poor conductor of electrical current.
You have not read even the wikipedia page I linked.
Plasma is quite a perfect conductor. Any electrical discharge (lightning, sparks..... and many others) is the demonstration of that.
Oh yes, absolutely third party experts... obviously members of Rossi's clan.
This is exactly what I call Prejudice and having an agenda.
You can't judge something that has not happened !
If people that do not think like you are part or the "Rossi's clan" , which is your clan ?
Widom Larsen ? IH ?
all we know and see is that Rossi has poisened the entire field of LENR
Come on ! the ICCF conferences are going on independently from Rossi.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…Conference_on_Cold_Fusion
Instead Rossi has revamped the interest on a field that was almost forgot!
Eric,
Good grief! I was attracted to this site by its name, looking for news and technical discussions of the subject. There is very little of either.