Posts by Roseland67

Quote from [email protected]

No one can tell Rossi how to do anything. I have met mercurial inventors like that.

Ross is not a scientist. He's a businessman thoroughly acquainted with the fact that people will do their best to steal his IP, and in the past people have stolen his IP. His actions match that of a con man but they also match that of a mercurial & paranoid inventor. Rossi initially didn't even want to do ANY demos unless it was to paying customers. But his friend Focardi was dying of cancer and wanted the recognition.

Here's what I don't understand. He was demonstrating a COP > 10 much of the time. How do you fake that much heat? Surely if it was really COP <1 then the damned thing would barely feel warm. Even the most pedestrian observer would notice such a severe lack of claimed heat.

How do you fake that much heat? Really?

You measure it with tools you supply and only you interpret the measured data.

DNI,

But "Rossi said" he offered a refund, don't you believe him?

Nothing to do with switch mode power supply induced harmonic current distortion

if the D.C. current supply is simply on/off

Zephyr,

Been going on for years, no reason for it

to stop now.

All,

Bob and Roseland 67 are not related, we have never met and are not colluding.

His opinions are his own, (they just happen to reflect mine).

SSC,

A grand total of NOBODY, ever once, has even remotely suggested that Darden was any kind of savior,

So why did you write that?

Axil,

You got it, that's it for sure,

Rossi goes to market with the quark X.

Please don't respond, it is rhetorical.

Quote from IH Fanboy

If Rossi wants to convince the markets, he must first convince the LENR+ community. Because the markets look here first. Don't misunderstand me: going to ICCF and convincing the aging traditional LENR researchers is not what I'm referring to. I'm referring to the crowd at ECW, primarily. I'm referring to the MFMP. I'm referring to a subset of the participants here. Convince us first by way of an open black box MFMP test, and the markets will open up like the parting of the skies.

Mercy, absolutely unbelievable.

Quote from interested observer

It is quite wonderful how folks like ele argue that there is "quite a long list" of people who have corroborated Rossi's work. People like Penon and Levi. Giants in the world of science with tremendous reputations. Well, no. Buddies of Rossi's who do his bidding. But that is quite good enough for the faithful, I suppose.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the determined Rossi believers will go to their graves positive that the e-cat is real regardless of what ever happens.

Interested observer,

That is because the alternative,

The believers were hoodwinked by a scam artist, is unthinkable to them.

They simply CANNOT be wrong, they are to smart.

Display More

Quote from oldguy

I doubt that the jury will have Penon's testimony - likely only his deposition. My guess is that Penon will not testify at the trial.

Old guy,

If he testifies, then he must be prepared to be cross examined, and I don't think he wants any part of that.

Sigmoidal,

If Rossi really wanted to know, he could have ,(and still could), simplyh se marine batterys for the power source.

These power and energy densities are fixed,

No 3 phase calculations, no connections to grid, no hidden wires etc. when the battery dies, the experiment does with it.

Quote from Italianlawyer

What's disturbing you? The fact I'm a lawyer, the fact I'm Italian or the fact I think Rossi is sincere? You can do better! Law is my field and I don't need to insult people (as you do) to substain my opinion 👏👏👏

I don't want to speak for anyone, but I'm guessing Probably not the first 2, but anyone who is gillible enough to think that Rossi is sincere is what is disturbing him.

Quote from Eric Walker

In US federal appellate courts, appeal is typically restricted to "consideration of the factual record as established in the trial court." It does appear to be common for new evidence to be admitted, but much (but not all) of the new evidence "falls into the category of legislative facts. ... these are, in essence, facts that are not directly related to the specific events in a particular case."

It would be interesting for someone knowledgeable to chime in on what kinds of new evidence could be admitted during an appeal, barring a finding of a mistrial.

Eric,

Like facts from physics professors from global universities that indicate from previous experiences, experiments and observations that "cold fusion" cannot and never has happened in this planet?

Display More

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Rossele - you wouldn't believe the things that we know. I see that you only chose to address a couple of the Fabiani related adventures that you funded but while we have your attention we'd like to know something. Why did you go and buy 10+ condos in Miami with IH money when you could have reinvested in the greatest invention since powdered sugar and changed the planet? Now you want us to believe that the ecat wasn't good enough and that you needed to iterate and commercialize with the quackx? (with a 1MW quackx in the mix nonetheless - that makes me howl with laughter every time you mention it)

Packing your bags for your next batch of dupes yet?

Dewey,

While I agree with your assessment of all things Rossi, I still would like to know how a bunch of smart lawyer type investment bankers like you got conned into giving Rossi anything?

What the hell were you thinking?

Display More

Quote from ele

Yes. Absolutely, also people who knows all his story stay on his side.

By leaving "his side", any financial incentive is lost. By staying, they risk nothing, by leaving get risk all,

no brainer amigo

Quote from maryyugo

Seriously? Because there is no QuarkX. Like there never was a working ecat. Like Rossi never got a PhD from an accredited school. Like he never made inexpensive isotopes of nickel or any other element. Like he never had a military customer or for that matter any other paying customer who ever said the ecat worked. Like there were never robotic factories. Like there were really no plans to sell power in Scandinavia. Like Rossi never worked with the U of Bologna or U of Upsala. Like he never did a truly independent experiment or a properly calibrated and controlled one. Like he never had efficient thermoelectric devices or a secret process for converting toxic waste to oil.... like... shall I go on? The evidence is OVERWHELMING that Rossi is nothing but a con man. A crook. With no real accomplishments other than fooling people. None EVER.

Wow. If Jones Day finds a decent expert to help them out (an expert in calorimetry, heat transfer and fluid flow-- not an LENR expert!) then their cross-examination should be hilarious. For openers, they could hire Krivit. I would love to hear the blind mice's excuses for letting Rossi's paws all over the experiment and for not providing their own calibration ahead of Rossi's instruments on the input and downstream of his on the output. I would love to hear how Levi failed to repeat his original ecat experiment in which he found stunning amounts of power and the measurement system had no phase change. All sorts of excitement is possible if those folks testify. Given that they don't live in the US, I doubt that they can be compelled and they would be total fools to volunteer.

Mary,

The question was rhetorical

Display More

I wonder why Rossi has not sold any other Ecat/quark to other customers outside of IH territory?

Surely this would benefit his position in court/trial.

"Ladies & Gentlemen of the jury, see here, 10 other companies are using my equipment and it is working as specified, IH sabotages my equipment so they don't have to pay per the contract"

Me356,

Have you generated excess heat

and was your experiment replicable?

IHFB,

Mighty big "IF" there amigo.

Rossi wants out but clearly wants to keep the 10 million

Para,

The physical meter can resolve any current used, BUT, the correct current transformer ratio must also be used.

Problem could arise IF, the current varied greatly and very large ct's may not be accurate under very low current flow.

i.e.:

1000 amp current transformers trying to accurately measure a 5 amp current flow