Please don't use this forum for veiled legal threats.
Maybe if you say "pretty please" it works better...
Posts by Thetruemonty
-
-
Dewey already lost a bet on Rossi. So you now want to make him bet against Rossi and maaaaybe he will loose money again?!
I don't know if he can take that much...
-
It is none of your damn business. That's not a dodge.
Fair enough. But it also is a major conflict of interest.
-
Do you have an idea when this O(happy)day will happen?
-
But IMO, there is room to both hope that Rossi is not the scammer Doral showed him to be, and also accept, and support IH for the good they are trying to do for LENR.
I wish they are doing this support and help the field advance. But since they are very keen on keeping everything as secret as possible it is not so easy to form an opinion about what good IH is actually doing.
-
Oh wow Dewey!
So now I might be the last to know?
Till today it was always "You will be the last to know!". Lost ur confidence?
Well nevermind. A lot of good people in LENR were convinced they saw something and then...
-
Whatever you say Dewey...
Maybe you could come back when you actually have something to show from Planet IH?
-
I would like to hear that from Jed Dewey.
As much as I like a good chit chat with you, Jed is a much more trustworthy entity.
-
So they didn't pay you for being an advisor?
You dodged my question JedRothwell
Did you or did you not receive money from IH?
-
-
In quanities that would influence the measurements?!
-
Im in. With all the stipulations above. Not Rossi selling to himself. COP>1. PUBLIC customer. Ie.i could go to a store and buy the (UL certified) unit. By March 22, 2019.
Hmm. Since Rossi said he only has an industrial licence to sell and I am not sure you are an industry....
-
You would take the 10:1 scenario as well?
-
Somehow stored in the tube...
How?
When you know all the ingrediences in the tube you can take a look for which element/compound chemical reactions are actually possible. Redox Reactions would be the most obvious candidate for me.
And you would see that something has changed chemically when you look at the products of your experiment.
From my point of view it is unnecessary to include the energy you invest in treating the reactants.
By the way, if there would really be a way to "store" this energy in the reactants chemically it would be quite an astonishing feat by itself and a lot of people would be very interested I bet
-
I thought we are only betting Quadloos here...
-
-
Sure Eric.
-
Well I am careful with my judgement. Especially when I base it on second hand information.
And from what Alan is writing he still has a reputation and his word has relevance when it comes to the scientists of the field.
But I think we can end this here as it won't bring us closer to any solution.
If Dottore Rossi is still around in a year or 2 without presenting something of significance that is marketable he will be forgotten and that is maybe what he deserves.
Except for Dewey of course. he will never forget his R'ster!
-
I hear your words about Rossi.
Did you ever meet him or work with him? Do you have first hand infomation about him?
-
I am still wondering why IH bothered with this ridiculous 1 year test.
I think Rossis motivation for this was to win time. Maybe for R&D. Maybe for something else.
But why did IH take part this charade?
