Posts by Promethian

I can comment that it was a Japanese modeling expert.

He also said that it's simple to build and incorporate into existing standard Tokamak design.

Someone informed me that rotating the plasmoid in a Tokamak reactor produces a great amount of electromagnetism.

But, they said that it would confiscate electrons from the ambient environment. They also said that aneuronic fusion with lithium-6 and deuterium is ideal. Hydrogen can be added to produce lithium-7.

The power output with lithium-7 and deuterium is estimated in models to produce 10's of Gigawatts.

The rate of fusion reactions is remarkable as long as the Coriolis rotation is obeyed.

I'm happy for the players in the LENR field like Brillouin Energy Corporation. I think they will succeed in the future given enough interest.

Quote from Alan Smith

Paradigmnoia

I'm not totally sure what you mean by 'reverse polarity' but when we tried an alternating NS magnetic dield on a frequency of about 10Hz it killed any reaction immediately.

There's a clue there, I think, for people who wonder how to control LENR systems.

Sorry, I mean that if your utilize inverse polarization values by reverse polarity of the control system, you would be able to attract the hydrogen to the electrode, yes?

Quote from Alan Smith

I think it is a key factor. I had a hunch about this being important - because that is what happens (to a limited extent) in electrolysis - the creation and orientation of magnetic dipoles in the material. And sure enough, Russ and I found that an intermittent unipolar magnetic field did stimulate LENR reactions - hence my early adoption of high-current low-voltage DC solenoid heaters wrapped around the fuel tubes. This meant that we had more Ampere-turns and hence a stronger B-Field around the fuel as it was heated and then allowed to cool to just below the Curie point. Which is where we often saw the best results.

Is it also your interpretation that by utilizing reverse polarity, would further enhance the reaction between nickel and hydrogen as to attract the hydrogen atoms to the nickel cathode?

I suspect a significant enhancement in LENR effects due to utilizing reverse polarity.

I don't think LENR is easily elicited in water, but I'm sure BEC knows these values since they did design and produce the wet-boiler system...

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

Can you supply a link describing this kind of polarization you are talking about?

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1747519819889936

So, with the knowledge of the first link would it be possible to elicit the polarization values needed, between hydrogen and nickel.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

What are "electrochemical values" you are talking about?

Well, this would only obtain as true given that the electrode of nickel were submerged in H2O to calculate the inverse polarization values between the electrode of nickel and water; but, I suppose that would be somewhat harder to determine.

Alan Smith , may I ask what do you think?

I suspect that utilizing polarization would be ideal for control mechanisms like Brillouin Energy Corporation since they utilize the Controlled Electron Capture Reaction mechanism. I did mention it to them in the BEC thread that they could increase the COP and surface area by utilizing polarization.

I further suspect that the reaction would be even easier to elicit with reverse polarity to attract the hydrogen atoms to the nickel cathode.

Quote from Cydonia

Polarization of what ??

Polarization between the porous nickel anode and the ambient hydrogen via electrochemical values between the two elements...

I have been following LENR for some time now, and haven't seen an idea that could be practical and useful at enhancing LENR reactions.

Namely, I believe that through polarization of nickel or palladium (ideally) with hydrogen that a greater surface area of material could be utilized and greater COP can be achieved.

I don't think it would be complex to follow the following recipe;

1. Elicit polarization values between electrochemical values between porous nickel or palladium and hydrogen.

2. An instantaneous increase in T and P to account for stimulating transmutation of nickel or palladium via LENR process. Overcoming the Columb barrier can be precisely calculated and hence the ideal value can be easier calculated whilst polarization is ongoing between nickel and hydrogen...

Hence, do you think polarization of nickel with hydrogen would simplify the LENR process and would enable an easier way to elicit LENR?

I should state that the ideas in this thread presented by myself are imbued with the supposition that there would be coherentist effects between eliciting a Coriolis effect in the Tokamak and the reference frame of the Earth-sun magnetic field potential.

I just wanted to make that as explicit for anyone scratching their head wondering why a Tokamak allowing or stimulating the Coriolis effect for a plasmoid (be it Hydrogen-Deuterium or thermonuclear), would generate it's own electromagnetic field.

Quote from Curbina

You are talking about the influence of a very small force (Coriolis effect) in a huge force (electromagnetic field).

I have long suspected, just by intuition initially, and later by the work of Geral Pollack that gives some hints, that the Coriolis effect in the atmosphere and in water has an electrostatic component that has been grossly overlooked, but still, the magnitude of this force is several orders below the forces created by electromagnetic fields in Tokamaks.

Yes. I was under the impression that if elicited (Coriolis effect) in a plasmoid consisting of thermonuclear fuel such as lithium-7 and deuterium, that the Tokamak might create it's own electromagnetic field (and even quite powerful given the sun's electromagnetic field). I never heard of doing this or whether plasmoids can in fact obey the Coriolis effect whether artificially stimulated or naturally arising in Tokamak reactors.

Quote from RobertBryant

the Coriolis acceleration on the sun's surface has zero relation with the Coriolis acceleration on the Earth..

Even for plasmoids that would obey the Coriolis effect on Earth?

Don't forget that 4 tonnes of hydrogen will lighten an a380 quite a bit. Did anyone see the new Rolls Royce engine that can burn pure H2?

Hydrogen

www.rolls-royce.com

Quote from RobertBryant

perhaps.. not very much..at all... maximum at the poles..

this calculator example gives the Coriolis acceleration as

0.2% of the Earth's gravity!

https://www.omnicalculator.com…olis-effect-and-airplanes

I believe the real values would be determined by the Coriolis effect on the sun proportionalized with the Earth. Maybe someone more competent than me with these calculations would be able to say whether utilizing the reference frame of Earth's magnetic field potential with the sun's own Coriolis effect would indeed produce the hypothesized confined magnetic field in a Tokamak reactor?

Some other thoughts about the Coriolis effect in Tokamak fusion reactors would be that by stimulating the Coriolis effect in a Tokamak, would be ideally elicited with thermonuclear fuel such as lithium-6/7 with deuterium or tritium, to elicit a magnetic field that would serve as a simple power generation device from spare electrons grounded with Earth's magnetic field. I also hypothesize that by doing this there would be proportional effects of even coherence with the sun's magnetic field at higher revolutions of the plasmoid per second according to the Coriolis effect.

What do others think?

I have a rather simple question about existing Tokamak Reactors and plasmoid physics.

Does the Coriolis effect exist in plasmoids or can be artificially stimulated in Tokamak Reactors to enhance power output?

I know there's a lot of talk about EVO's and ball plasma's in nature; but, in your opinion if one were to stimulate the Coriolis effect in a Tokamak fusion reactor, would that possibly correlate with Earth's magnetic field and hence create it's own magnetic field that would serve as a significant increase is power output?

Thanks.

BEC Given PV=nRT I believe the purpose of polarizing the lattice of nickel alloy with the hydrogen would be to then either or both raise the operating T or P in the closed system to raise the amount of atomic transmutation occurring in the lattice while your electric mechanism is eliciting pulses in the lattice.

I hope that all made sense.

Otherwise, I believe a coupling of electron orbital wavefunction values between nickel and hydrogen might assist in a higher COP.

BEC

Hello, Sir

I've been following you for quite some years, and have gathered some thoughts on how to enhance or attain a better COP that you may have been struggling with. Namely, in one of your previous devices called the "Wet Boiler", I believe that to elicit the CECR phenomenon better, would it be possible to polarize the hydrogen with the nickel alloy that is used as the reactor and then cause a electric pulse to enhance the performance and efficiency of the device?

I also would like to point out that polarization of the H2 in the HHT reactor via CECR process may lead to greater coupling of the electrons between the nickel and hydrogen.

Let me know what the team thinks? I've literally, only been following your device since the opening of this thread and believe that it's not a gimmick to rely on polarization values into the electrically controlled mechanism of inducing LENR in your (preferably) Wet Boiler or even HHT reactor.