Posts by Promethian

Seems like anti-neutrinos seem to be also a key player also:

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep13945

Every second greater than 1025 antineutrinos radiate to space from Earth, shining like a faint antineutrino star. Underground antineutrino detectors have revealed the rapidly decaying fission products inside nuclear reactors, verified the long-lived radioactivity inside our planet and informed sensitive experiments for probing fundamental physics. Mapping the anisotropic antineutrino flux and energy spectrum advance geoscience by defining the amount and distribution of radioactive power within Earth while critically evaluating competing compositional models of the planet. We present the Antineutrino Global Map 2015 (AGM2015), an experimentally informed model of Earth’s surface antineutrino flux over the 0 to 11 MeV energy spectrum, along with an assessment of systematic errors. The open source AGM2015 provides fundamental predictions for experiments, assists in strategic detector placement to determine neutrino mass hierarchy and aids in identifying undeclared nuclear reactors. We use cosmochemically and seismologically informed models of the radiogenic lithosphere/mantle combined with the estimated antineutrino flux, as measured by KamLAND and Borexino, to determine the Earth’s total antineutrino luminosity at . We find a dominant flux of geo-neutrinos, predict sub-equal crust and mantle contributions, with ~1% of the total flux from man-made nuclear reactors.

[...]

Yeah, we are there:

https://arstechnica.com/scienc…nteractions-of-neutrinos/

If we can build one on the silent and desolate Antarctic continent, then I'm pretty sure there's some military applications at play here.

https://theconversation.com/th…lazar-as-its-source-99720

What's up with the world if we don't already have Neutrino detectors in order to prevent nuclear war/proliferation/detectors...

Either there's some conspiracy or hard limits at play.

Are we really not there technologically?

Quote from Paradigmnoia

What we might get instead could be digital neutrino communications tech. Call right through the Earth, no problem.

Brilliant. Wonder how far are we away from that reality.

Quote from Paradigmnoia

If military reactors (like on submarines) can be found by neutrinos, then a lot of resources will be directed to find how to shield neutrinos.

Conspiracy theory: Neutrino shielding is next to impossible unless they aren't completely massless as they aren't. Hence you can estimate some things about their origin or even distance from the detector to the source...

Quote from Paradigmnoia

I was thinking the same thing, then thought... then neutrino shielding and manipulation will eventually result...leading to more neat stuff...

Is neutrino shielding possible, please elaborate about the purpose of manipulating neutrinos?

I can see a really nice world if you can't shield neutrinos.

Quote from fabrice DAVID

Perhaps we could trace all nuclear reactors onEarth, including mobile reactors.

OK, I just read this, and think I understand the implications. No more nuclear secret localities, right?

Wow!

Nuclear subs, no more. Secret nuclear enrichment, no more, nuclear proliferation that can actually be implemented through perfect knowledge, wow!!!

Quote from fabrice DAVID

The "Lochak Transition" is the equivalent of the excitation of an electron in a higher level of energy by a photon.

But in the case of the "Lochak Transition", it is a neutrino which is excited, and this neutrino becomes a "magnetic monopole". (picture) It should be noted that the monopoly retains the direction of the incident neutrino, which would pave the way for precise neutrino astronomy using “tabletop devices”, unlike the current large neutrino telescopes, like "Antarès" or "Icecube".

Perhaps we could trace all nuclear reactors on Earth, including mobile reactors.

In the vicinity of an operating nuclear reactor (such as Chernobyl's No. 2 reactor), or in the vicinity of a recently shutdown reactor, the neutrino flux is very large.

If we “pump” these neutrino to the monopole state, for example by an MHD effect, these monopoles will stop themselves in the matter, and by effects which go a little beyond my theoretical skills, they will accelerate beta decay .

However, it turns out that delayed neutrons are emitted at the time of beta decay of short-lived fission products. If we put the MHD device between two nuclear reactors, one of which has been shutdown for a short time, we will form two monopole jets. (This MHD device can be a specially designed device, or a simple accidental electric arc) The two monopole jets will stop inside the reactors and produce two "puffs of neutrons". (Since beta decays of short-lived FPs will be stimulated.) Short-lived FPs are very rich in neutrons, and each beta emission is accompanied by one or more neutrons. On the running reactor, the effect will be negligible because the controls rods are in place. But on a shutdown reactor under xenon effect, control rods up , the effect could be catastrophic.

I never succeeded in observing this effect, by exploding metal wires using a plasmoid generator, but I had few short-lived FPs at my disposal. (Spontaneous FPs of Americium)

On the other hand, in the immense mass of a reactor, the effect of these "monopoly showers" could be very significant.

Display More

Fascinating stuff David!

I wonder if you could just create fuel rods in a simplistic and elegant manner that would elicit this in a scaled down manner. One with enriched Uranium, the other, with something like spent fuel??

Quote from Navid

Notice:

The scientific community has attacked Montagnier because he has delved into unallowed research into electromagnetic waves and water. There is a reason he is willing to say these things cause he has is already outside the fold - so he has nothing to lose.

For those who aren't watching the video game moment by moment - I recommend this article talking which gets into how the tests are themselves highly problematic. https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/…-meant-to-detect-a-virus/

So here we are: Tests shouldn't be used to test for disease, no testing of the population (mortality= #deaths/incidence of population), any deaths w/ test or suspected covid are covid deaths.

The data is the frontman however. The closer is manipulation through psychology, culture, and a religious signalling morality ("Comrads this is serious, we must all make sacrifices for the greater good....")

Display More

Sorry, what do you mean unallowed research? Sound more of that BLP... stuff.

Pretty old concept; but, the part about monopole EM fields is new:

The resonance absorption controlled reactor - IAEA

What is Compound Nucleus and what is Resonance?

There is no difference between the compound nucleus and the nuclear resonance.

The compound nucleus is the intermediate state formed in a compound nucleus reaction. It is normally one of the excited states of the nucleus formed by the combination of the incident particle and target nucleus. If a target nucleus X is bombarded with particles a, it is sometimes observed that the ensuing nuclear reaction takes place with appreciable probability only if the energy of the particle a is in the neighborhood of certain definite energy values. These energy values are referred to as resonance energies. The compound nuclei of these certain energies are reffered to as nuclear resonances. Resonances are usually found only at relatively low energies of the projectile. The widths of the resonances increase in general with increasing energies. At higher energies the widths may reach the order of the distances between resonances and then no resonances can be observed. The narrowest resonances are usually the compound states of heavy nuclei (such as fissionable nuclei) and thermal neutrons (usually in (n,γ) capture reactions). The observation of resonances is by no means restricted to neutron nuclear reactions.

https://www.nuclear-power.net/…sonance-compound-nucleus/

[...]

Simple stuff. Wonder why we don't really exploit the mechanism behind nuclear resonance.

Turns out it was a research project from a Wuhan lab that escaped in a non malicious manner. Google it.

Quote from Wyttenbach

As said the control bars were out and couldn't be brought back again. What happened afterward is just speculation as an explosion was unavoidable anyway. Nobody will run this test again ...

So, if I may be so bold. What is your opinion about nuclear resonance? Seems Superior to using moderators to control the fission process.

The takeaway in my opinion is utilizing nuclear resonance to elicit energy production along with possible transmutations of fuel used...

Quote from Wyttenbach

The cause of the accident is known in almost all details and it's well documented.

The chain of events and all decisions made, yes. But, the fact that anomalies like those pointed out by Alan, are intriguing. Besides, it is well known that fuel rods often experience resonance; although, in my opinion the amount of it was so high in Chernobyl that caused or led up to the massive explosion in my opinion.

Quote from Alan Smith

It is certainly true that analysis of fuel rod fragments post explosion showed unexpected isotope distributions. This can be found in the literature, for example here:-

Isotopic Composition of Uranium in Lava-Like Fuel-Containing Masses from the Fourth Block and Radioactive Fallout of the Chernobyl NPP Service Area November 2002Radiochemistry 44(6):621-625

https://www.researchgate.net/p…hernobyl_NPP_Service_Area

I think this is all one needs to know in regards to abnormal nuclear resonance in the reactor prior to the explosion. I don't think there's any harder evidence, than perhaps a US spy satellite at the time that passed over the area.

Technically you could create a cloud of VERY high density plasmonics through inducing a state change of some nuclear fuel through resonating the nuclear fuel by inducing a magnetic field of monopole nature.

Sounds like gibberish but it ain't. I mean we all do know that transmutations are accepted as common nowadays in the LENR field.

Heres my theory. Its tantamount to a version of not so LENR to highly energetic materials.

Technically in some theoretic scenario mass can get converted to energy at much higher rates or speed than what is thought as the baseline. All through eliciting these highly resonant nuclear states.

Quote from axil

After the LION reactor melted down, the experimenter connected the reactor to a 12 volt light bulb and connected it to ground. The light bulb produced light for 1/2 hours. It produce 37 kilowatts of power. LENR can produce electric power directly without the need for a heat conversion step.

Here is one of the many such direct to electricity LENR systems that have been invented over the years.

External Content youtu.be

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Yes, well, and here we are 19 years later and nothing came out of it. Theoretically, what I understand the purpose of a resonance reactor is to do away with breeder reactors, along with having a VERY long life-span. Furthermore, it seems to me that you get 4 birds killed with one stone. 1) Direct production of electricity, 2) Heat, 3) Production of high grade fuel, 4) Effective dealing with existing nuclear waste.

Do I sound "high", sorry if so(?)

Yeah man, think of the possibilities of utilizing Thorium in a resonance reactor, or even accelerating the decay of nuclear waste or even its implementation in a resonance travelling wave reactor.

Sorry, kinda amazed at doing away with the heat energy exchange of turbines through miniaturized reactors utilizing magnetic fields generated through a nuclear resonance mechanism.

OK, now I need to calm down. Sorry.