Posts by Cydonia

It's not necessarily silly as idea what they did. In fact, it is also the AIrbus patent principle that were inspired by Holmlid. Monoatomic hydrogen created by discharge and low pressure condenses on a semiconductor surface doped positive by additives. These electronic holes are supposed schrinking monoatomic H by deforming, I think, electronic orbitals.

Alan Smith wrote:

Fabrice's ( fabrice DAVID ) papers on the 'fusion diode' are now available as a bulk download:- here's the abstract

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS WITH SOLID STATE FUSION DIODES

Fabrice David and John Giles

The authors present a different approach to prove the reality of LENR: the Fusion Diode. This device has no input energy, relying on the only energy produced. The diodes are fabricated as powder diodes, with a large surface junction made up of a semiconductor in contact with palladium charged with deuterium. The suspected fusion reactions take place in the junction between the semi conductor and the Palladium powder, which produces an excitation which is transmitted to the electrons.

https://www.academia.edu/26174…SION_DIODES?auto=download

Display More

zorud you stay dreamer, investors are all pragmatic, politicians too.

Remember that a former US state employee, ex NAZI, helped them to walk on moon.

Be a clown as you explain about Rossi appears as a lesser evil.

Yes, it's a reactor certainly censurable but we reached 1W and 1mbar sensitivity, so it has been well demonstrated that only few hydrogen (1mbar) well carries calories.

We had 2 heating systems in order to play with temperature gradients.

We worked by comparison, with the same temperature and pressure parameters in the same tube. At one side there was NI mesh Pd coated then on the other side only Ni Mesh naked.

We made so much runs... first of all to avoid leaks, This stage is already a big job.

Paradigmnoia wrote:

I cannot help noting that there are dissimilar metals added to the thermocouple circuit at the mini plug connection. This will almost certainly affect your temperature measurements.

See attached file.

Almost everything stays inside.

JedRothwell wrote:

Do you mean spongy or Raney nickel? (Raney nickel is a product name.)

Or something like a scrub brush? Like this:

From our side we saw no XH with several courses under D2 onto Ni mesh.

First we tested the manual way to put Pd onto Ni, then we tested too 50nm Pd sputtered also 100 nm.

Nothing but our reactor was smallest than Mizuno.

We have heated by a central wire surrounded by a ceramic tube to enlarge IR wavelengh.

I discussed with Mastromatteo at last ICCF, he explained me that he have had XH when he made several loading cycles , first by H2 then powerfull XH by D2 with the same sample. However he didn't use Mizuno way, he used a Ni foam with 1µm Pd put electrochemically.

The fashion powder remains since one year ago, the nickel/aluminium alloy.

Unfortunately any paper from Imoto was shared in this way ...anywhere..

Alan Smith wrote:

Thanks to Akito Takahashi for bringing this to my attention - the abstracts (link below) look very interesting, but sadly, no presentation listed from Mizuno.

http://jcfrs.org/JCF20/jcf20-abstracts.pdf

Wyttenbach

i think just that moderator's have different opinion of how to handle this case, the result is that demagogy prevails over scientific quality.

LF's lost himself.

Demagogy definition:

Action to flatter and excite popular passions to increase its popularity, its power.

I take this opportunity to express myself on this subject.

Indeed, it has been a long time this subject has lost any objectivity on LF, ICCF or elsewhere.

Today this subject remains a support on foremost, to discredit, probably voluntarily Lenr case.

Don't fool us with an other fight, mods will find other ways to discredit our subject, anyway in the future.

Some are so vicious and manipulative that I strongly suspect they don't spew their venom only by masters orders . I am thinking in particular about a certain Californian you know Alan.

LeBob synthetize as you said monoatomic hydrogen remains easy much more than prolonging its life's duration.

We need some tricks to that,, help of secret catalysts for example.

Shane D. as a beotian like me could you explain what is an Electric Universe ?

In few words what are specificies of this vs current understanding ?

Thanks

Shane D. started this thread by the title Rossi last chapter .. but it must be noted that Rossi misses you all when we see again your impassionated answers, He remains a current part of your lives for a lot of different reasons...

We work by comparison to look for XH.

We put 2 mesh one next to the other surrounding the same central heater in the same tube , so same IRs and same pressure.

there is a TC at each mesh but these can have identical or different definitions.

Conduction problems are pushed on backside like that we only are focused on Ni/Pd definition.

yes jeff you are right !

We have seen that only 1 mbar changes things to lowering IRs influence VS direct conduction.

jeff wrote:

One thing I noticed is that H₂ (or D₂) gas has a high thermal conductivity, particularly at relatively high pressures. This phenomenon was observed in a Celani-type of experiment, where the temperature of the internally heated element was monitored with an IR thermometer. Interestingly, the H₂ thermal conductivity (as measured by the difference in heater element temperature for a constant ambient temperature) did not change appreciably until the H₂ pressure was reduced to a few tens of milli Torr. This effect may not impact the temperature of the external containment vessel, but it would have an effect on the temperature of the Ni mesh if the mesh were heated via an internal heating element.

Most of the most famous European guys involved in Lenr field have "gathered" themselves to present a common project.

Unfortunately, their respective ego both respective ambitions make that the cake will be too small to nourish the greed of all this assembly.

dear Wyttenbach

you suggest to switch Pd cathode metal however by which one ?

Then how you reach 1,3 loading factor because the great and incriticable ( here) McKubre said to have never overcome 0,9 ?

Wyttenbach wrote:

Two weeks after P&F 's first (1989) publication US los Alamos national lab did confirm their findings. Excess 4-He was measured from D-D fusion, to exclude any doubt of the origin of the excess energy.

The true question is: Does it make sense to use Pd electrodes for a process that we can do much cheaper?

Pd loading e.g has been researched much deeper and load factors up to 1.3 are possible. But this leads to extremely high energy content if all D would fuse. Further Pd is expensive and transmutes to Silver and then to Cadmium and thus finally will be lost.

The only question today is: How to engineer a LENR cell that produces sustainable excess heat for a long period.

To solve this real problem the funny comments of THH & Ascoli provide us with the appropriate distractions. It's a big pleasure to watch how much money & time 1000's of physicists at ITER/CERN/ Wendelstein, ..spend, just to produce rubbish models and finally nuclear waste (ITER).

Just to give you an idea: A recent temporary resonance found in one CERN experiment triggered 600 papers.... now all in the waste bin... How man Higgs related papers will end in the same place? My guess is 100000's...

Display More

Curbina

However this is the only theory that is presented on LF ?

I think they did a good job even though their theory has become less fashionable of dominant thinking.

https://www.lenr-forum.com/article/1-what-is-lenr/

Dear LDM ,

Magnetic field can be induced at atomic scale by spin state transfer, the so-called spin current induced by the many radical chemical species encountered in Lenr field.

Conclusion, you are right !

whatever their strategy, we can't blame Google for having injected money in the field !

Perhaps Lenr leaders are responsible for failure so far, sucking in money for irrelevant scientific postulates, dragging Lenr followers behind them?

Post edited- too personal. Alan

Zephir_AWT

what uncultivated are you ?

you should know that these 50 nm are the exact surface plasmons resonance thickness (+/- 2nm) of most metals !

About Google, a lot of money but no original concept/Ideas, only back in 1989, it's shaky...

Zephir_AWT wrote:

Initiated by Matt Trevithick of Google in Mountain View, California (which supplied the funding), this project brings together teams led by Yet-Ming Chiang at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Curtis Berlinguette of the University of British Columbia, and Thomas Schenkel of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. They have revisited the electrochemical experiments and also explored a different approach to fusion that uses deuterium plasmas surrounding charged palladium wires.

Producing High Concentrations of Hydrogen in Palladium via Electrochemical Insertion from Aqueous and Solid Electrolytes (PDF preprint), Time-lapse video of a representative foil cathode in an aqueous cell during a simultaneous XRD and electrochemical H insertion experiment

X-Ray diffraction enables to study expansion of Pd lattice due to absorption of hydrogen. The first set experiments has been widely criticized for its low saturation of hydrogen, which is important predictor of cold fusion success - this new study adressed reaching higher hydrogen load (H:Pd ratios 0.7-0.9) under standard three electrode arrangement. In one version experiment utilized BZCY ceramic electrolyte operating at 700 °C, whereas others utilized aqueous sulfuric acid and Nafion polymeric electrolyte at room temperature.

But the study utilizes only thin sputtered layers of palladium (50 nm thick Pd thin films sputtered onto a 127 μm thick Kapton film substrate). It's debatable, whether thin porous layer of sputtered metal can provide high enough volume for formation of whisker dislocations and propagation of polarons along them. At any case, it's interesting and thorough electrochemical study - but it still cannot be counted as a seriously minded attempt for replication of Fleischman-Pons experiments, which consistently used bulky samples.

Display More

remember number of experts from flatearthforum.com before copernic ahhaahhaha.

your model looks good, especially since we have just seen that supernovae have lumps (architecture with entangled subassemblies).

https://arstechnica.com/scienc…-explosion-and-a-mystery/

your model comes out of my question, do hydrogen atoms have the same size regardless where they are in the universe ..?

Universe is a kind of avalanche made of lumps (multiple subsets that conform matter)

I have no more patience to explain really more for my part ...

go one last, dark matter doesn't exist because galaxies collapse naturally on their black hole. this is only a step. This grinding is only a reduction of number of space dimensions.

what becomes this matter? just radiations ..

https://www.space.com/fermi-bu…ay-radiation-mystery.html

To finish your 4D system remains an analogy from a 2D object that turns on itself and move forward both (need for universe expansion ..)

visible matter having a number of dimensions greater than the invisible one that which supports radiations but most importantly, all dimensions are linked all together as a 3D face spot on your flat 2D skin. ( see Nobel prize year 2348 )

Wyttenbach wrote:

That's why I (we) want to do better LENR experiments. Latest when we publish/patent more stuff some people get a wake-up call.

My frustration is not personal: I just see how much live time is wasted for the support of a nonsensical model. 10000's of students do examen on stuff that only exists in weird minds and most possibly also damages their minds the same way as it happens in any cult that is just based on my uncle (e.g. Dirac) said...

Unluckily my strength is complex logic something most people miss to study in depth.

Just one example of complete weirdness of our discussion: THH claims the inability to calculate mass/energy by SM is not important. Next sentence he says: Oh yes QM could may be derive gravity... Oh no the mass is given by the Higgs field and ohhhh the Higgs particle has of course no mass at least not given by the Higgs field by what then ????? The Higgs particle is thus just not real and lives may be in a complex space called our mind that generates all mass we measure.... But why claims CERN it can be found by the same mechanism as all other particles???

Two more beers!

Display More