This remains my biggest fear .. if Alan or Jed aren't able to sell another Mizuno's hands, many will encounter replication problems probably ..
This is why i should try rather by electron beam sputtering.
Posts by Cydonia
-
-
Interesting debate between 2 theorists, breathe fresh air..fells good
-
Gryzinski said by wiki you shared:
Gryzinski presents many other arguments, especially for agreement with various scattering scenarios, to focus on nearly zero angular momentum trajectories: with electrons traveling through nearly radial trajectories. Attracted by the Coulomb field they free-fall to the nucleus, then increase the distance up to some turning point and so on.
What you could suggest as experiment to link with these theorical thoughts ?
From my understanding, if you remember thermacore's case or Nasa 's Fralick, we have to consider cluster's of ionized things.
About thermacore, H+ cloud was ionized during loading onto 1kg Nickel particles, creating an electrostatic field.
Then electrons rebalanced H+ cloud by waves. Quickly.... you should meet Gryzinski scenario in this case.
The same about Fralick when H+ flux released from Pd bulk have sucked electron's around ( from Pd or air around) by waves too.
During rebalancing, i think that a thermal gradiant should help to increase electron's radial vector.
Summary:
Gryzinski electron's behavior works well if you consider nuclei's clusters, rather than just an nucleus and one electron, i suggest.
-
Wyttenbach you said:
Unluckily the Bohr model does not use toroidal electron orbits and neglects the second radius force.
So, we have to understand second radius force which appears to be radial for yourself, Therefore basically Bohr orbit picture already shows orbit's fluctuation as a radial force.
Finally it isn't true so Bohr radius model fluctuates following its tangent then you suggest rather the radius both ?
-
-
Stranges thoughts about sulfur involvement...Because Celani's notoriety sulfur have to be avoided about Lenr experiment..!?
From own readings it appaers to increase live duration of monoatomic hydrogen.
-
Sorry Alan Smith for my ignorance but what does mean "high vacuum mass spec" exactly ?
-
we shouln't care about heating type, guys, or its length. the main thing is not to exceed 3W / cm2 to make FIR.
By surrounding a simple, short resistifive wire by a big metal tube would do the same thing.
-
Mizuno's heater system less than 3W/1cm2? what does this suggest to you?
Thermocouples are great. I was only commenting on IR cameras, ect. Thermocouples should be used to verify the IR anyway.
-
Less than 3W by each cm2 , it remains very cold, very good to FIRs....
Display MoreAfter a bit of struggle with the MonotaRO website, I did find the page for the heater Jed specified:
https://www.monotaro.sg/g/03032749/
The manufacturer is Sakaguchi E.H VOC, p/n 1M2500
Choosing 500 watts gives the sheath diameter as 2.8 mm and 2000 mm length. The price is quoted as 149.90 SGD (Singapore Dollars), or US$110.53. Shipping time looks like about 1 week ARO.
** There is no flange on this heater, just the sheath. We need additional details of how it is mounted through the CF end plate in a way that is gas-tight. I would use a Swagelok pass-through but better if Jed can specify a part number and attachment method eg. welded or screw-in.
MonotaRO doesn't seem to ship to USA, and Sakaguchi has no distributor outside of Asia, so substitution seems unavoidable. There's nothing suitable at Omega or McMaster. The search continues...
AlanG
-
Shane D. you could do a first list of challenger's even if it seems they is a favorite ?
Well, getting beyond parables, and analogies, the way I see it is that Google has made us part of their team. They gave us a chore to do, and if we do not get it done, we will be fired. Then we have to go apply for unemployment.
Understandably, they do not want excuses from us for not accomplishing our assigned task of whittling the list down to 3 (was 1 until you made your point), anymore than the GPM wants to hear excuses from his fellow team members for blowing, or blowing up an assignment.
-
Japanese teams everywhere have got the level of results with powders..
-
You forgot L series...too
-
I had proposed CATIA V5 but it may be too French ? JR said he didn't like part colors, maybe he can't see them ? I don't know ?
In any case, it's over for me.
Would a 3D CAD tool be helpfull?
I'm not able to provide it, but I would like to sponsor maybe a web based 3D CAD like sketchup.com is providing. Enables collaboration via browser and mobile devices.
-
If they are skilled as claimed they should understand...Lenr links..
-
When we see the price we understand why Dr Mizuno used its.
It's well suited to small researchers not sponsored by GAFA's.
-
Just a little note @Shane D, i'm agree with you however Google staff remains unclear.
At the beginning of this thread they should have clearly asked what they want to do or not with LF people.
A specification, they must know ?
A little politeness too, just to introduce themself ? team, task ?
They are the claimant.
We have many watching this thread. Guest visits are way up, with healthy participation by our members. So far, I am not sure we are putting on a good show for them. I believe we have to up our game, and do better than this. Put petty differences aside, and keep old disputes where they belong. Respect the purpose of this thread. Think beyond self interests, and favoritism, and put the field first when commenting.
-
i'm agree Alan therefore despite JR's attempt to find out more, I remain wary.
Dr Mizuno doesn't recommend anything special just be good for his budget, it seems.
In this case, may be sometime he used something close as a TC with ceramic external skin.
However i probably speculate too much
No- the Mizuno heaters are sold as 'flexible' with quite a small bend radius. To me that suggests that they are in an inconel or similar metal sheath.
-
yes, i confim too it's a good analogy, classicism before daring like Lenr field since 30 years ?
Airplanes need to fly a relative wind created by the movement. Now, if you blow above wings you will get the same effect but more effective. Then you can remove wings if you blow above the central body. you see now that current sky masters as Boeing or Airbus aren't so exciting as expected, they are just some followers of brothers "W right" ..
Let's see channel wings concept from Willard Custer.
http://www.rexresearch.com/custer/custer.htm
Now, i hope that last Mizuno"s experiment is also an airplane without wings
Display MoreThat is a good analogy. Maybe not the way you meant it. There were many different approaches to building airplanes circa 1900, such as A. G. Bell, and Maxim and Lilienthal. Those were smart people. Their ideas deserved respect, although the efforts did not make much progress. However, in 1906 the Wright patent was issued. All successful airplanes after that have been based on their discovery, which was 3-axis control. Also, all of them have wings with chambers similar to this, and similar length to width ratios. These are very different from Lilienthal and other early attempts. The Wrights were superb engineers and they had rigorous proof these were the best chambers and ratios, at the low speed their airplane was designed for.
In other words, every airplane after 1906 is a descendant evolved from this design, and all other precursor designs are extinct.
Needless to say, there has been tremendous progress in aviation! There was tremendous progress between 1908 and 1914. By 1914, there were airplanes that could fly 6 passengers for hours, going thousands of miles. Outwardly, they looked completely different from the pusher design of the Wrights, with the elevator in front. But from the engineering physics point of view, they were similar. They owed the Wrights royalties for the patent.
If the Mizuno design actually works and it is widely replicated, it will probably be the starting point for all future designs, just as the 1906 Wright patent design was. But there will be tremendous progress. Future designs may look very different outwardly, but the microscopic details of surface where the reaction occurs will probably be similar. It is likely there is fundamentally only one effective design, just as there is only one way to control an airplane (with 3-axis control).
-
Could you share references ? For me this type of heater could have an external layer in magnesium oxide which have a large IR spectrum.
Important finding or not , who knows ?
The Cartridge heater I am looking at says:
Cartridge heaters have low/moderate watt density elements consisting of helical wire coils on ceramic former or high watt density elements with the heating element located close to the sheath, which is swaged to improve heat conduction.
Is it okay to have a helical wire coil or does that confuse things?