Nice finding

Quote from Ryoji Furui

I just wanted to share an interesting article I came across about fusion. According to the report, RocketStar, a rocket company, has discovered that a fusion reaction is possible at the nozzle of a spacecraft. This type of fusion can be referred to as "semi-hot" fusion, which suggests that fusion reactions do not necessarily require high temperatures to overcome the Colombo barrier. I think this discovery could potentially provide indirect evidence for LENRs.

RocketStar Announces Successful Demonstration of Fusion-Enhanced Pulsed Plasma Electric Propulsion

Well, i don't understimate your work, your thoughts but we can also share some other thoughts good or bad .

Anyway, an old idea is it especially bad ? Anyway, what i try to highlight is that something ( 3D ?) what go "too fast" ( relativistic) in one privilegied direction will "deform" its 2 other axis because it's not all spatially homogenous.. it could be the main principle what "shape" the universe, in my mind..Now as you said, yes, a 3D space isn't especially a limit and a donuts shape to explain how a nucleus is "moving" internally , satisfy me well.

Quote from Wyttenbach

This is a 2500 years old idea presented by Aristoteles... In topology it means that you can only walk in one direction once you did start. The "line" can have any shape depending on the structure of the space.

E.g. a sphere is 2D and lives in 3D Euklididan space...

I remember to have watched maybe 20 years ago a movie about a recent former a simple worker even ill who involved himself to save the Sequoia trees from the destruction.. Apparently it was a true story but don"t remember the name of this guy and the movie's title..

In my mind there is no debate between fields and particles.. I only see geometric things .. Let's consider that one D is generated by 2 directions etc .. As light should be 2 x 2 D and particles something as 3D.. However the main parameter should the light speed limit which generate an anisotropy .. For example id a 3D particle beocme relativistic , they have to lose some dimensions for trying be closer to the limit..

Quote from Wyttenbach

may be once read Einsteins last words::

the famous Einstein citation of 1954 :: Einstein Remarks in a letter of 10 August 1954 to M. Besso : “Yet, by all means, I consider it as possible that physics cannot be founded on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In this case, from my whole castle in the air, gravitational theory included, but also from the rest of contemporary physics nothing remains.”

Fields are a mathematical crutch to map reality into a more general structure. Reversing the logic only tells that people do neither understand math nor physics!

The end of this madness was the prediction of a fiction called Higgs particle. Fact: No Higgs has been found in the new energy range of the LHC at CERN. The 125.95GeV energy has been found already a long time ago (SPS) and not declared a Higgs...

So field based physics is fake and the best way to cheat politicians ...

Display More

All the equipments around us are a compound of so many simple parts.

Even the computer you currently are using.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Basic rule of logic:: You cannot define something complicated by something simple. The sum, the parts are more than the parts.

Further in experiments only so called force fields can be proven. All other fields only exist in your head and are not real!

Well , i started to read your great work so more quickly i expecte i have to ask my first question from the abstract:

Particles are the sources of fields and carry some invariant, constant properties (like charge, mass, magnetic moment) that are used to define physics.

So why from what you postulated that ? in your mind particles are the source of fields when in mine a field is a source of particles.

because a field possesses intrinsically less dimensions than a particle.

Then a field is anysotropic ( as light) not a particle..

Quote from Wyttenbach

The list of errors and misconceptions of the standard model (V2) has been published yesterday::

The basics of physics (or why the standard model fails)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379078038

The new model is here since about 4 years now:: The proton and its resonances R II https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374536554

Display More

Until then the channel should become a simple river

Quote from Alan Smith

Giant redwoods can live for more than 2,000 years, so there's still plenty of time for the UK's trees to catch up.

The first speaker seems to have undergone a biological transmutation, with his hair ?

This is why Texas became "on head"

Quote from sam12

Texas getting organized to have a better Nuclear. Future.

Carl Page has the last question just past

1:hour 3: minute mark.

External Content youtu.be

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Agree with that

Quote from RobertBryant

Cardone et al. 2015. mercury ultrasound expts appear to be a one shot wonder

spaghetti Western?

certainly not much in common with the current nickel(Pd) alloy based hydrogen gas expts by Celani, Iwamura, Takahashi or the previous palladium electrolysed hydrogen..by many

except.for. the bromine 79 the reported transmutations were low--ppm levels eg Th232. 35 ppm

maybe not enough to generate much gamma radiation or heat

but. more than enough to radiate copious DST speculation for a number of years

https://www.researchgate.net/p…nZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19

Display More

Aaaaaahh these sneaky Englishmen always trying to deceive us... However this time this is a Scotsman, I don't know if we can conclude the same ahahhaa, who can help me ? Anyway their respective whiskey is quite different...

Quote from Cherepanov2020

We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT

We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing

OOH my god if the italian Lenr contribution is reduced to this article probably i will start reading all Tarasenko's "works"...

Quote from Curbina

I have been sent the latest paper published by the team led by Fabio Cardone. With a very exhaustive mathematic analysis, this work proposes a way to control experimental parameters to achieve the nuclear effect through manipulation of energy as a dimension.

https://www.peertechzpublications.org/articles/AMP-7-205.pdf

Abstract

The framework of the Deformed Space-Time theory has been extended in the past from four to five dimensions, where the fifth coordinate is the energy exchanged by the interaction. In this theory, each fundamental interaction is described by an energy-dependent metric.

This picture has been exploited in order to take care of the interaction behaviour both when Lorentz invariance holds and the spacetime is Minkowskian and when Lorentz is violated and must be recovered in a non-minkowskian spacetime.

It has been successfully attempted to complete the pentadimensional metric of the four fundamental interactions calculating the fifth element of the metric corresponding to the fifth coordinate energy.

The mathematical tool exploited is the method of the Ricci flow which gave the complete explicit form of the fifth element of the metric, answering in this way the question of "how the energy measure the energy" for each interaction, setting the electromagnetic interaction as the reference for the energy measure. In this sense it has been given meaning to the problem of the energy gauge for interaction, identifying the gauge with the fifth metric element.

The consequences of the nuclear metamorphosis have been also examined for reaching the technological goal of a device stably producing this metamorphosis under the hadronic metric. The most valuable consequence is that in this pentadimensional picture, the old Einsteinian dream of a complete geometrization of the interactions is reached.

The results achieved in the present work have allowed to design, build, and test of devices capable of exploiting the behavior of the fifth element of the metrics to obtain the production of electric charges directly from the nuclear metamorphosis of the matter.

Display More

Well thank you, anyway the first with KW XSH will be right, do you think to be on head ?

Quote from Wyttenbach

D-D fusion is the normal case under a non kinetic environment. IF you provide to much H then H-D may lead to 3-He that has been confirmed in many Japanese reactions.

Sonofusion targets and glow discharge targets did show 10x above background 4-He already around 1990. Either you do cold fusion and know the relevant people or you just repeat the garbage of other garbage tellers.

I did publish gamma spectra with > 100 known lines 2..10x above background. What else do you want to discuss?

I'm agree with you that this DD fusion wasn't probably the good one, and again agree that probably a kind of spallation reaction occured. In this way, i found strange that never Pd cathode isotopîc changes were nerver investigated.

About the cluster involvement, this is one of all the theories as electron screening in the same way.

However in my mind and especially for a spallation reaction so removing some neutrons...The current understanding of the nucleus shape isn't enough to well explain that.

The phenomenom exists but not yet the good theory behind that.

Quote from Drgenek

The so called cold fusion miracles are based on the assumption of D to D fusion. As you will see on reading the pdf on the introduction post, the main reaction does not include D to D fusion. Instead, much of the deuterium is converted to neutrons and protons.

The first miracle of cold fusion is usually listed as lower the coulomb barrier to fusion that is an unnecessary assumption in the case of clusters the presumptive answer is the cluster is causing acceleration of some particles to the MeV range. Another miracle is the lack of high energy radiation. Since, presumptive answer is that higher energy radiation is absorbed to the cluster, that would not be an issue. Any further discussion of these miracles should wait for the pdf which provide data and analysis in support of the presumptive answer.

On my side, i never meet and never have been in relation with him but i know what his work involves.

Quote from Alan Smith

I know him pretty well. Good mathematician, Russian-speaking Ukranian, very ambitious but also very single-minded, though they often go together. A bit like Dr Swartz in many ways.

Well rather being maybe too rough against the "constructive"   GRMattson could you explain why you are how to say dubitative about the so called cold fusion miracles ?

This is an open question not a criticism.

Quote from Drgenek

Already you are campaigning rather than reading. If you don't what to know then stay off this thread.

I will provide a proof that anyone who accepts facts with basics skills in logic can follow.

The first pdf shows that the derivation of a balance nuclear reaction equation leads to the presumption of a cluster catalyst as the cause of the nuclear reaction equation. The catalyst is the reason the reaction occurs without meeting the Lawson criterion as required by a conventional fusion reactor. Further, it is the reason for the other so called "cold fusion miracles".

The next part is complex because unless one believes the derivation of the balance nuclear reaction is correct then why would one believe the presumptive conclusion based on that derivation. It is complex because the facts fit together, each fact is important and there are many facts to consider.

Display More

https://www.vant.kipt.kharkov.ua/ARTICLE/VANT_2023_6/article_2023_6_18.pdf

it exists also this video to summarize his ideas.

Quote from Diadon Acs

Yes, there is a lot of fantastic work there by Dubinko.
However, they are Quasi-crystalline specific and are not entirely practical at this stage of the ULT paper.
I think his work is highly useful for experimental applications and computational modeling of materials.
Again, this leads to some legal issues with IP in using LENR ARA and I would need to get permission before I could proceed incorporating there raw or processed data sets, which to my knowledge is not open to the public still?

I don't have access to the latest paper they published titled,

"GENERATION OF ACCELERATED PARTICLES IN SOLID MATRICES SATURATED WITH ISOTOPES OF LIGHT NUCLEI"

So you if you or anyone you know has access to the full paper it would be greatly appreciated.

Please allow me some time and have patience, my mathematics are not world class, but rather mediocre at best.

I'm only in the theoretical modeling game out of what seems like a necessity in an attempt to get some of these brilliant minds to work together, if at all possible. 😅

Display More

Why are you forcing mathematics on us, like the madman who tries to convert non-believers?

No, I don't agree that mathematics solves everything, and besides, you seem to get bogged down in your hypotheses when you go beyond 4D ?

Moreover, in your model, does it exist accelerations/decelerations or yout donut speeds are almost constant, which I don't think as possible to well define the nucleus stability.

Quote from Wyttenbach

You just did show that you don't understand. Else you would give us a mathematical equation that explains your idea.

Quote from Alan Smith

There are several Dubinko papers in Jed's library. There is no reason not to link to them, or make quotes.

Rather than Hagelstein phonons don't forget Dubinko's postulates.

Quote from Diadon Acs

It doesn't seem to be playing nicely with people who view in 'dark mode' on there web browser.
So I have attached a PDF version of the first draft.
Any feedback is appreciated and collaboration is greatly appreciated.

Not agree but i can't tell why because your friend already used all the ink

Quote from Shane D.

Yes, it is (too much to read through)! But this is his own thread to play with as he likes. We all come here knowing that, so hard to then complain Gennadiy's posts are redundant and long. However, as far as I am concerned, once he posts on other threads and does the same, then he is fair game.