You evoked surely real results but only from secondary works.
You talked about the US army or navy however you well know that size isn't the most important, see recent Google's fiasco related friendly by Hagelstein.
Cydonia
Verified User
- Member since Oct 17th 2017
Posts by Cydonia
-
-
Dear Jed,
i have seen this last ICCF as an italian cappuccino.
One millimeter strong at cup's bottom, by new words i heard from Hagenstein and Visostki, work from this guy Casselman, this one about dusty plasma, Czerski, what else ?
The other millimeters were only this white milk foam plenty of air, we see, every year.
-
well your milliwatt reactors don’t interest noone.. the ICCF cake is fell back.. Mass médias need more than dreamers to move forward.. Fortunately the field still have the LEC to give nuts to formers.
-
Fully coexistence of different dimensions fills our universe and as you said well explains a lot of things as light but also at higher scale the controversial black matter. I don’t know if it exists a relation between scale of things and number of dimensions. So all of this sticks well with string theory. Again probably neutrinos and single quantas are the same objets apart a gap in nb of dimensions .
-
I like string theory good or bad. How do you judge to define a good or bad theory.. Good or bad this of Wyttenbach is also speculative..no ?
-
And Fabrice David ?
We didn't see or hear him at this ICCF, maybe he made a poster?
-
Agree with that 👍
I sympathize with the Brillouin people. It is difficult to move an experiment into a new building and make it work. In 1980s trade shows, many companies had difficulty setting up production models of computers and running almost-but-not-quite ready demonstrations. Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.
-
As several theorie ways, i followed also your suggestions with plasmons by studying papers from Tanabe San for example.
However i have to say, plasmons are only collective movement of electrons.
Often you link plasmons and plasma BUT a plasma remains a collective movement of electrons both with nuclei.
In this way, only phonons do that especially with their electrons shift at high temperature acting as a pseudo plasma if fact;
There is nothing political about it. If the research that is done is based on the incorrect set of assumptions, the research will not be successful.
For example, it the SAFIRE system, there is no lattice compression to produce fusion, yet the SAFIRE plasma produces abundant transmutation. It is clear that the assumptions about the reaction based on lattice aided fusion are wrong. Google's assumptions they were told about the reaction were invalid, that is why they failed.
The reaction is highly deceptive, what experimenters see in their research is the oposit of what they are expecting because of the nature of quantum mechanics. Like Richard Feynman once said, "nobody understands quantum mechanics".
-
if the insulation is too high then the reaction will get carried away and all will melt.
The Role of Appropriate Calorimetric Methods for Scaling-up LENR Devices and the Irrelevance of Coefficient of Performance (COP) - Daniel Gruenberg | Mizuno Technology, Inc., Thailand
Very impressive. They have made a great deal of progress since Mizuno and I published papers.
The "irrelevance" of COP applies to this reactor type. It means the reaction is triggered or increased with temperature, and the temperature can be as high as you like by changing insulation. In an experimental unit, heat is produced by resistance heating. The amount of electricity needed is a function of the insulation, so there is no fixed ratio between input and output. So in that sense it is irrelevant. It would be relevant to other kinds of reactors that are triggered or controlled with electricity.
-
The Lenr are also a political topic like any other kind of topic. Also it is often the seducer who wins the investment to the detriment of the real worker.
I let you guess who is the seducer, who is the worker on this picture.
i can share plenty of other examples.
About Parkhomov you mentioned technical things are more deep, trust me.
Yes, a plasma is first of all more tunable and possesses some good points.
Display MoreParkhomov runs his reactor very hot. The failed replications could be due to a cold reactor.
It is my beleive that electrons and photons form a quasiparticle called the polariton. Unless the reactor can produce the proper frequency of light through black body radiation, then the reactor will not work. Parkhomov runs his reactor very hot and therefore can produce this required frequency of light.
This insight goes back to the Hot cat reactor where Rossi understood that a hot reactor could produce the reaction in a plasma. The Hot cat produced better results the hotter that it ran. Rossi went off and created the "Marie Curie" reactor: Rossi's first plasma reactor.
I would asked the Google team replicators how hot they ran their replications. It could be that the replicators were constrained from high heat production or just afraid or unable to apply the required high heat to their reactors.
Parkhomov's whole theory relies on the temperature of the bulk solid to be as high as possible above 1000ºC. It was 1700ºC + in the case of his 225 day reactor.
The Google team based their replication on bad theory, the cold fusion theory. If the Google assumed the proper theory, the nanoplasmonic theory, they might have replicated Parkhomov.
In the future like George Egely new plasma reactor, the sucessful LENR reactors will all be plasma reactors. The SAFIRE project teaches us that the reaction can be gainfully even when the plasma temperature exceeds 80,000K. The cold fusion meme will lead to failure as Google found out.
-
Bullshit in fact is not this one expected.....
What does this have to do with Brillouin? What do you mean?
-
This ICCF is to me a real milestone, as a poker game, so many cards became revealed
-
It was you who criticized Rossi a while... ?
The Brillouin demonstration at ICCF-24 was cancelled. A shame.
-
That is right Biberian takes out back the famous Icarus cathode from the wardrobe at least once a year.
-
Roughly 4 years ago
-
I know at least one big company that went to see them and said... no way.
In my opinion they should stop trying to develop this on their own. They should do what Clean Planet is doing. Partner with big industrial companies such as Miura and let the industrial company do the engineering. Let them figure out how to make it reliable and scaled up. If Brillouin has what they claim, they could easily persuade large companies to do joint R&D projects.
I have no reason to doubt they have what they claim. On the other hand, I have no reason to believe it, either, since their demonstration did not include any quantitative data. Maybe some of their other demonstrations do include data. Does anyone know?
-
A special gift for our reporter.
Display MorePeter Hagelstein starts Day 3 on Models for accelerated nuclear deexcitation: Dicke-enhanced excitation transfer on the 14.4 keV transition in Fe-57
Modeling LENR uses a coherent process, not incoherent, like billiard balls. This new models couples an ocsillator between 2-level systems.I won't even try to interpret this. However, he is saying "nuclear molecules" might be a way forward. "We need ground-state, non-rotating nuclear molecules." But these will decay: radiative decay, internal conversion, and fission, so this is still incomplete.
Hagelstein is optimistic that this new model might be the one to describe what's happening in the field. He's got a lot of calculations to do to be sure, but he's really feeling good about these new ideas using the nuclear molecules.
-
Well, he shared his disappointement about the fact that he wasn't consulted by Google team when they attempted so many Parkhomov's replications.
About Google, it remains strange that a "so great and responsible team" as highlighted yesterday by Trevithick followed the "Parkhomov way", a way came out from nowhere with albolutely no link with any theories previously knew in the field ?
ICCF 24 - Comment - Response - Challenge - YouTube
Greenyer unloads on Google and Hagelstein. I remember well BG's MFMP report on his visit to Parkhomov in Moscow years ago. Some things just do not add up to me.
-
Because the time difference , this morning, after read last comments and results, i have to say that only Iwamura results seem relevant, even he is wrong by thinking that pressure variations are linked with xsh.
In fact, yes, but indirectly.
Biberian by his Clean HME project proposed 10W/100 grs when Andrea reached 10KW/100 grs.
However we should highlight replication attempts done by Edward Beiting, suppressing some fashion former ways.
-
You forgot the poor Tarasenko
