Posts by Cydonia

Well,

Storms proposal considers a reaction between 2 D together then what i suggest is rather a reaction between a simple H ( not H2) with an atom from the metal lattice to generate X rays.

As magicsound said to not have seen any effect with only simple iron, i suggest the isotope involvement rather than another species as carbon, sulfur or phosphorous.

i remember this old paper from CEA retired by which they propose this way.

You should use Google document translation to leave from the french.

i can send the native .doc for people who should ask me.

i think it remains the key...

3 options:

1- H mono penetrated become "amas condensed" H2 ( beta phasis)

2- H mono penetrated become "well separated" H2 ( alpha phasis).

3- H mono penetrated remains "well separated" H mono.

In this last option i expect that codeposition process should do amorphous lattice more able to stabilize H monos..

At other side, by a perfect and regular cristal lattice H mono loaded should move more easily helping the recombination.

Well, after a night of thinking in fact i thought not so relevant the idea of hydrogen trapped inside an hot lattice then cooled.

If we use a chemical way, indeed, the host metal lattice will trap both an hydrogen atom not especially an H2.

So, we could imagine in this case that maintly H monoatomic could be trapped, it couldn't be the case in my previous hypothesis by which we should except full H recombination.

So in this case of chemical deposit, all H monoatomic could be well separated from each others and could become relatively "stable" i expect ( against recombination) .

Even if with time it will migrate finally however this should need a relatively long time i think.

In this way i could imagine this highly reactive H mono could react with an host atom then both should transmute to produce X rays in the end.

In this way, a better choice ( isotopes ) of host metal should be considered to improve the effect, i propose.

I see apparently a lot of difficulties by chemical way to trap hydrogen inside a metal.

Why don't fill a metal when highly heated ( above 700°) as well as hydrogen will be able easily to cross across it, then making a quick cooling (in ambiant water) to keep the trap ?

Austenitic steels should be very good for that.

Maybe the Hydrogen filling rate should be lower than the current method, i don't know.

Please stop polluting constantly the Forum probably this is your brain which never achieved a critical mass.

Quote from Dr Richard

Yes, well thin Kanthal wires will not achieve a critical mass or density of protons and neutrons for a reactor to work. So this way is pointless.

Low X rays emitted.

Quote from THHuxleynew

Re this replication. Forgive me for asking newbie questions - but sometimes a from the start summary can be helpful anyway.

The anomalous behaviour here, as I understand it, is that a closed gas tube with two electrodes acts as a low voltage low current source. I can understand low voltage source - but the surprise is that it conducts at all, even a little bit - because gasses should be good insulators unless ionised, and ionisation requires high voltages. (There are known surface configurations that will ionise at lower volatges but that is still 10V or so to sustain and a few 100V to start)?

In addition the OP said ionisaing radiation had been detected. I take that with a pinch of salt if low level since false positives are quite easy - unless it was very clear (higher level). But, if it was very clear, I guess you would all be taking about it?

So - if the above is not missing the point - which it may be - the thing to explain is how those low currents could flow through a gas cell.

THH

Display More

it seems you took passengers in your car finally

So if i have well understood the SS tube you added was used to protect the first alumina one.

From your side, what was the pressure reached with your LAH considering the dead volume ?

Quote from magicsound

As you may recall, I did a long series of similar Glowstick ("GS") experiments. For GS4 I used a Nickel fuel capsule inserted in the Alumina reactor. The first image below shows the remains of the fuel capsule after reaching 1230°C in the core. The second image shows similar destruction of the SS316 fuel capsule from GS5.2, which reached 1180°C. That experiment produced COP ~1.1 for nearly 1 hour, and a clear Bremsstrahlung gamma signal far above background level.

Both these experiments used Ni powder with about 15% LAH by weight.

Display More

Well,

You said to have used only 100 mg LiAlh4 and 1g 200 mesh Ti powder so how high you estimate the internal pressure reached ?

Good job jeff

Quote from jeff

"I always wondered why rather use an SS tube than alumina as fuel tube ? Is there a secret to using an SS ?"

The reason is most likely the same as that which convinced Parkhomov to include an SS tube in his later experiments. Lithium, or lithium compounds react with alumina far more readily that they will with SS. I first ran a Parkhomov-type experiment with Ni + LiAlH4 in an alumina tube. The result was a near instantaneous erosion of the alumina resulting in the lithium mixture melting (burning) through the alumina.

I always wondered why rather use an SS tube than alumina as fuel tube ?

Is there a secret to using an SS ?

Quote from jeff

Given that Ti has a very high affinity for hydrogen, I thought it might be interesting to run a Parkhamov-type experiment with Ti rather than Ni. In this case I loaded 100 mg LiAlh4 and 1g 200 mesh Ti powder into a 0.188" OD stainless tube 2" in length. The ends were plugged with fused quartz wool. Then the SS tube was placed in a 0.25" OD alumina tube around which was wrapped 32 T of 0.032" Kanthal wire. The entire apparatus described above fits into a 38 mm OD fused quartz tube that has connections to DC power, vacuum, and H2. The quartz tube is capped on both ends by machined endpieces with radial O-ring seals. I have no trouble maintaining 1e-6 Torr or better vacuum under continuous pumping. The experimental protocol went as follows.

1. Evacuate cell at room temperature to 1e-6 Torr or better.

2. Introduce 20 Torr dry H2

3. Step the heater voltage from 0V to 35V in 5V increments. This yields heater power from 12W to 540W and cell temperatures from ~100C to 1100C.

4. Add/bleed H2 from external source as required to maintain a pressure of < 100 Torr (This is the limit of the Baratron). I wanted to ensure that the system operated at sub 1 atm pressure for safety reasons.

5. Record alumina tube surface temperature and Delta T from the airflow calorimeter vs. heater power. I used an IR thermometer to monitor the temperature of the alumina tube.

The first run showed no excess heat as compared to a Ni + LiAlH4 + H2 mixture. The results were also nearly identical to running with an empty (no Ni or LiAlH4) cell. No excess heat, and the calorimeter delta T closely matched values for an empty cell.

The second run produced something unexpected. At a 35V heater voltage the Kanthal suddenly burned out. This was surprising since a 35V heater voltage has previously yielded

surface temperatures of <1100 C maximum. I was not able to record the cell surface temperature at the time of burnout because of heavy sputtering on the interior of the quartz tube. Also, the calorimeter did not have time to reach a steady state.

Upon disassembling the cell it was obvious that the SS tube and its contents exceeded 1500C: see attached photo. So the question is whether the sudden increase in temperature was due to chemical or LENR causes. I'll repair the apparatus and repeat the protocol and see what happens.

Comments are welcome.

Jeff

Display More

Rossi have well summarized the Lenr status when he said:

The substantial underestimation of what we have done has given us a real advantage, since instead of changing the game, the attempts that are going on to imitate us only try and fix old schemes.

So true...with the passing of time..

Quote from orsova

An old article, but new to me. https://www.wired.com/1998/11/coldfusion/

Well, i think the only truth should come, a day, from the one capable to produce reliable and repeatable KW in front of everyone

Quote from LeBob

Silver burns similar to tungsten(though this has differing isotopes) and other tmetals do, at high enough temperatures with *hydrogen, too hot. A picochemical afterburner or reactive anode of inexpensive materials would convert a lot of the heat to light or electricity directly.

Keep telling yourself that my friend! This is all related to one or two symbiotic phenomina. Shouldn't, but thankfully it is, deep down you know!

Well, thank you guys for your interest

In fact i think that "universe" before the "big bang" was isotropic then became anisotropic after that.

That implies a preferential direction for our universe represented by this 4th dimension.

However, this extra dimension does not represent time, the notion of passing time, I mean.

Physical objects such as atoms have a different number of dimensions, near the center, they obey a 3D + 1 law while by reaching electronic orbitals, the law is becomes 2D, like galaxies ...

The Famous void ( our void i say) obeys a 2D law even if it appears in 3D because this is a 2D + 1 (the additional dimension of Wyttenbach ).

Why all of this ?

In fact, the form, the logic of form of all objects which appear "solid" to us is the same whatever their size.

It's pretty incredible, but it's the same between atoms and galaxies !

I had a lot of trouble understanding this notion of "passing time". In fact, time is simply the fact that an object changes in size ... whether it grows or vice versa, this is very much linked to our own human body existence, in fact.

Why are atoms very stable?

Like its dimensions, its energy is in fact constantly turning on itself ( Wyttenbach understanding) , this "size" does not vary this is why its own time being equal to zero involving its stability !

I stop there, I lost everyone ..

Lots of aberrations in current physics.

For example Einstein postulated that mass and energy are the same thing, either, but how would he have interpreted the universal mechanism of action/reaction which implies minimum 2 objects ?? His thing is incomplete ...

To me, i think that charges are only space charges ( not punctual) of nucleons depending of the place they take.

The blue circle at right is a circular center of rotation of these nucleon space charges.

Again, as you can see at right side, this sketch shows in fact a Fourier transform from only a single original wave.

That means particles sciences doesn't exist, what we can see if only different expressions from this Fourier transformation....

Yes.. However we don't have to understand there isn't the same amount of minus and positives charges.

In this way, we couldn't consider charges as punctual charges but rather as surface or volume charges..

The fact that charges are punctual or not should be only a variation according to where they are take place ( number of space dimensions which isn't the same every where..)

I made this in the past, by ok, probably difficult for all people to well understand all things.

For example for torus models as explanation for nucleus shape, this black energy should be the radius here by the red arrow.

Quote from Drgenek

Are you saying there is a dissymmetry of charge across this axis.? i.e. matter but not antimatter?

For myself vacuum fluctuation alternates rather our solid baryonic matter with "void space" between each element of this matter, atoms, objets .. etc..

This void space is what we postulate as "ether"..

A "virtual" axis of symmetry separate these 2 "worlds"..Everywhere..

So ZPE could transfert mass from the "void" side to our "solid" side.

As mass equals energy Lenr XSH could come by this way..

Again this symmetric axis takes place at the distance between the Wyttenbach torus center to the center of the torus section. In fact at universe " beginning" it was a perfect symmetry then a potential energy of the universe was stored by a dissymmetry inside all atoms..

i don't think mixing every concept is relevant, EVO, Safire, Mills , tungsten.. etc you forgot the LEC or Rossi probably..

The truth shouldn't be so easy ..

Shane D.

You well know, good or bad, i already followed the Rossi's way.

However about this "suncell" way, i'm not really aware about a lot of things.

Only that silver liquid should be involved to produce shrinking hydrogen.

What else you know and to share ?

Thanks

I criticize the cowboy and Google, on the other hand, they have the right to do whatever they want with their money. Either way, they haven't been able to do much but the Google name getting involved has been pretty positive I think.

Quote from Ahlfors

@Cyndonia

McKubre fits not bad the expectations build in Google academic minds - think at a sort of employing interview: do you prefer borderline neutrino and muons inmeasurable showers ["we need CERN to be sure"], or the reassuring professionalism of a Menlo Park lab expert?

However Ahlfors Google team had a lot of interest in McKubre words, a US famous old guard member, who is co-responsible in these 30 years of waste of time..