i'm sorry, eric, i don't let bullies and censors get away with their actions.
Your previous reply was moved to the "Clearance Items," as was the one above.
that constitutes censorship, eric - it's called bullying, and it has consequences. by claiming that you wish to follow the principles of scientific and academic enquiry yet then enacting CENSORSHIP when someone points out logical flaws and cognitive dissonance, that has consequences: it means that your reputation is now completely destroyed.
now, i do not have any reputation to uphold, and you have crossed the ethical line here which is the "red flag to a bull" for me. you can continue down this route, continuing to enact CENSORSHIP, or you can apologise - publicly - and restore all the comments that you have censored.
this will go some way towards restoring peoples' trust in you that you have very quickly betrayed, and restoring your standing on this forum.