with a cup of ersatz coffee each ..maybe 22 million or more Axilons. can coordinate.
in time and. space to.accommodate.22 Mevs...
22 million Axilons form a quasiparticle called the Megalomaniaxilon. It is a sentient quasiparticle with a greater understanding of physics than all non-axilated humans.
I see quasi-particles in Widom-Larsen theory. That theory is based on oscillations of electrons and protons in a medium. The combination of wave energy and particles is quasi-particles. The environment focuses the necessary energy to cause "neutronization.' The theory suggests that neutronization is not the same as inverse beta decay or electron capture, because unlike the latters, the former occur in free space rather than only in the nucleus. Like many LENR theories its greatest flaw is the expectation that a material surface in a specific configuration is the magic sauce for LENR, nuclear reactive environment (NAE).
A quasi-particle is not expected to have a quantum state which decays to produce specific characteristic radiation. In contrast electron-gravity induced fusion has radiation which fits the phat equation. E=n2(~13.6 eV). Phat radiation is characteristic of pseudoelectrons. The many quantum levels (values of n) of pseudoelectrons causes electron-gravity, hence the self-assemble (not waves within a medium independence) of a catalyst for nuclear fusion. Unfortunately, I been preparing pdf is a series and have not yet got to the serial pdf or in-depth explanation of the phat equation in electron-gravity. But I promise it is coming and will appear in RE: Electrogravity (electron-gravity) as a cause of nuclear reactions.
What does this have to do with Widom-Larsen theory not being very useful?
Imprecise writing, what is not useful, LENR theory?
Imprecise writing can lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations, and can even undermine your credibility. Imprecise writing can be due to using vague terms, or using words with multiple meanings.
Here are some tips for writing more precisely:
- Avoid using imprecise words, such as "thing". Instead, be as specific as possible.
- Avoid using vague terms, such as "approximately".
- Avoid using words with multiple meanings, such as "equivocation".
- Write in active voice, rather than passive.
- Cut out adverbs.
- Rewrite sentences starting with "There is" and "There are".
- Recast "of the" constructions as possessive.
- Avoid overuse of "that" in a sentence.
- Turn nouns into verbs.
- Resist rewriting data presented in a figure or table.
Quick show of hands. Who thinks Alan writes more precisely than Axil.
I vote Alan.
In my definition, precise language should not be composed of 98% gibberish and fantasy.
Now to me , i believe strongly that atoms could not have the same size depending of their location in the universe.
Shouldn't a "strong belief" come from strong evidence? Or is it more of a "hunch"? There are too many "strong beliefs" on LF.
after spinning around a quasi-axil the QP explodes into an EVO..maximising entropy in the universal frame
The EVO is just quasi-particulate in anti-deAxilian spacetime. It is a chiral polariton superconducting BEC which exhibits electroweak unification and forms a complete universe from Dyson vacuum decay. By simply engineering quasiparticles, any competent engineer can create any fantastic conditions they desire, like negative mass, negative resistance, true magnetic monopoles, faster than light travel, negative energy, and effective weight loss and male enhancement pharmaceuticals.
our users (most over 50 years old)
You had to go there 
When quasiparticles break down, they produce nasty quasiparticulate. That is why I support unparticles. They unpolute. When inventing fanciful particles, physicists should keep things green. Virtual particles are another story. They can be quite virtuous during their fleeting existence.
What I find troubling is how Mills plan has become more "Rossiesque" in the sense that he claims to need a fully commercial solution before getting any traction. I may be naive but I think a working prototype could convince university professors the technology works. He acts like they can never be convinced. Of course Rossi has nothing. I'm not saying BLP's tech doesn't work.
Defkalion has a K in the name, so that futher supports Axil's "Postulate Of Simularity" for the catalysts. Plus sometimes temperatures are measured in degrees K. So units can make a difference.
Bob Greenyer finds a lattice of mixed transmuted elements inside a EVO.
Bob Greenyer, despite his enthusiasm, has found nothing important. If he had found the things you claim (magnetic monopoles, transmuted elements, etc) he would be on the fast track to a Nobel prize.
Indeed this is the Wyttenbach model, great . Are you working together ?
Axil is the real brains in this two man team. Wyttenbach is too hung up on math, and does not have the creative ability to reinterpret pop-sci and wikipedia articles to hint at his all encompassing unpublished theory.
BTW, electrons aren't particles, they are electrons.
Electrons are photon mass or something, according to our other resident pontificator.
The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO
There was no such discovery, and pair of monopoles is a dipole.
Instead the monopole turns
the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles
Gross!!! Don't be crude please..
Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
can't be sure at all of what one is talking about.
Testability never stopped you from pontificating things as absolute truths before.
This is what science is thinking about these days
"Science" can't think. Scientists can, and I guarantee you they are not thinking what you are thinking. If you doubt me, then find one scientist who supports your nonsense.
This isn't the thread to obsess about the guy in the bad wig. It just helps to give him the notoriety he desires.
But LF got rid of our obsession thread. And we were obsessed even prior to the wig. The platinum sponge wig just cemented our relationship.
History... Unfortunately, J.J. Thomson died without knowing that Maxwell had “set him up with a false theory,” and that Maxwell had actually deceived J.J. Thomson...
He would still not know that if he were alive today.
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/GAsy/kfh5GUjJU
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…PG-ZFUMw/edit?usp=sharing
There was too a discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was healthfully correct.
There was too a discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was healthfully correct.
J. J. Thomson autobiography | Department of Physics (cam.ac.uk)
The end of this madness was the prediction of a fiction called Higgs particle. Fact: No Higgs has been found in the new energy range of the LHC at CERN. The 125.95GeV energy has been found already a long time ago (SPS) and not declared a Higgs...
Are you saying they retracted their claim of discovering the Higgs?
Rossi always gaining slow but sure.
You are kidding right? He is gaining like the human race improved in Idiocracy.
I do not insult my opponents... You are just a “misguided” person who does not read my articles... This is normal...
I am not your opponent. You just disagree with everyone else about this "no charge" concept, so I don't think it would be right to call me and everyone else your opponent. They don't as much oppose you, as ignore your "theory".
