We need more Bryce Mitchell’s in
this World.
Yeah, we need way more people whose job it is to beat the hell out of other people and preach.
Way more useful and noble than, say, engineers and health care professionals.
We need more Bryce Mitchell’s in
this World.
Yeah, we need way more people whose job it is to beat the hell out of other people and preach.
Way more useful and noble than, say, engineers and health care professionals.
I know that "the Lord works in mysterious ways", but through scammers using sockpuppets?
DearoAndrea, God dwells in another dimension and men walk the earth. IfGod did not exist, it seems unlikely that the human race would have surved this far in the face of horrific challenges threatening it and the earth we inhabit. No need to answer this post but it is likely that you are one of God’s servants upon the earth, helping to usher in a new and better era for the human family, and you never conciously knew it.
But now we must understand what the Nuclear Active Environment (NAE) is, it is useful to know how to build the NAE.
Oh God, another new buzzword/TLA (three letter acronym), freshly coined by an armchair ECW physicist. YANQTCYOB.
(You Are Not Qualified To Coin Your Own Buzzwords)
Doesn't quartz friction &/or certain forms of violent quartz separations produce light?
But earthquakes don't cause widespread seperations in a whole area. Perhaps only along faultlines.
There are interesting stories about the "Earthquake Lights" before the tragic Morocco earthquake.
This seems to me right in the LENR wheelhouse.
Or dare I say, in hopes of not bringing out the crackpots, EVO related?
From the finest scientific source (and politically unbiased source as well) CNN.
That sounds amazing. Are you planning to try iy?
No. His time is more valuable spinning new theories based on the latest buzzwords he finds.
Well axil is maybe an impassioned guy but never a shallow mind
A deep mind filled with nonsense.
Unzicker is more charming
and he has a cute Bavarian accent
And he understands math and physics. And he doesn't try to project that he knows everything while being completely unqualified while spouting buzzwords.
"The pot calling the kettle black"
I never once pontificated about any personal "theories".
I just point out crackpot posts that are not theories.
A theory must involve math.
If there is no math, only buzzwords, there is no theory.
When I researched particle physics in an undergrad independent lab in the 80's, I was under the impression at the time that everyone understood that quarks themselves might not exist.
It is just that they were a valuable building block to construct the known particles at the time. Did these get elevated to "real" particles?
I thought the big problem with the quark model is that it can't explain the mass, requiring the ridiculous "quark soup" non-sense.
I have been attempting to falsify the fusion theory of LENR in order to raise LENR from pseudoscience to science.
It is impossible to falsify anything by spewing buzzwords and made up crackpottery.
In the words of Lloyd Christmas, "So you're saying there's a chance!"
Is LK-99 a Superconductor After All? New Research and Updated Patent Say So (yahoo.com)
.
In your example you are averaging two uncorrelated parameters.
And he's averaging parameters with different units. Kind of like averaging velocity and acceleration.
I heard Pine Demon and thought of Jersery Devil. Being from Philly, we heard more than a few scary stories about being in the Pine Barrens late at night!
I grew up on the outskirts of the pine barrens in South Jersey.
What I can prove is irrelevant. Both you and your associates will undoubtedly experience these characteristics of the reaction because they will assuredly occur. If you don't recognize them for what they are, you'll will just be confused and spend years trying to overcome them if at all.
It must feel awesome to be the all knowing expert on everything, watching all the confused idiots who do real experiments foolishly failing. It is like a demigod looking down with derision on his flawed creations.
From the above quote:-
(this should be taken as a fact which we will not prove)
That is not science, not physics, but pure bluster. Faraday would have died from embarrassment.
Isn't that statement the epitome of a religious dogma, that we must take this on faith?
That statement is not as much bluster as religion.
It is incredible how people read something on Wikipedia, and it suddenly becomes the most important topic in the universe, and is automatically tied to the EVO, of course. Latest fascination: the magical "Electroweak Force" which only existed unified at over 10^15 degrees K, yet somehow exists in everyday EVO's. Is the electroweak force more important than the Higgs field? Does it generate "hexagonal fields"? Does electroweak force generate chiral polaritons which was a previous most important topic?
I wish theorists here would start updating Wikipedia with all the profound theories proposed here. I looked up Pine's Demon entry on Wikipedia only to find it never once mentions massless electrons or the fundamental tie to the existence of the universe as we know it.
Another "Pines demon" from where I grew up.
Just imagine I am 5 years old. See if you can explain that sentence to me.
Better yet, explain the theory with math, not buzzwords.