BTW, electrons aren't particles, they are electrons.
Electrons are photon mass or something, according to our other resident pontificator.
BTW, electrons aren't particles, they are electrons.
Electrons are photon mass or something, according to our other resident pontificator.
The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO
There was no such discovery, and pair of monopoles is a dipole.
Instead the monopole turns
the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles
Gross!!! Don't be crude please..
Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
can't be sure at all of what one is talking about.
Testability never stopped you from pontificating things as absolute truths before.
This is what science is thinking about these days
"Science" can't think. Scientists can, and I guarantee you they are not thinking what you are thinking. If you doubt me, then find one scientist who supports your nonsense.
This isn't the thread to obsess about the guy in the bad wig. It just helps to give him the notoriety he desires.
But LF got rid of our obsession thread. And we were obsessed even prior to the wig. The platinum sponge wig just cemented our relationship.
History... Unfortunately, J.J. Thomson died without knowing that Maxwell had “set him up with a false theory,” and that Maxwell had actually deceived J.J. Thomson...
He would still not know that if he were alive today.
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/GAsy/kfh5GUjJU
There was no discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was fatally mistaken. 24.07.2023 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…PG-ZFUMw/edit?usp=sharing
There was too a discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was healthfully correct.
There was too a discovery of the electron in 1897. J. Thomson was healthfully correct.
J. J. Thomson autobiography | Department of Physics (cam.ac.uk)
The end of this madness was the prediction of a fiction called Higgs particle. Fact: No Higgs has been found in the new energy range of the LHC at CERN. The 125.95GeV energy has been found already a long time ago (SPS) and not declared a Higgs...
Are you saying they retracted their claim of discovering the Higgs?
Rossi always gaining slow but sure.
You are kidding right? He is gaining like the human race improved in Idiocracy.
I do not insult my opponents... You are just a “misguided” person who does not read my articles... This is normal...
I am not your opponent. You just disagree with everyone else about this "no charge" concept, so I don't think it would be right to call me and everyone else your opponent. They don't as much oppose you, as ignore your "theory".
A year has passed... Has anything changed in your worldview? If it has not changed, then read this article in English -
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://cloud.mail.ru/public/Nj1U/VcuDSB5zT
We find Maxwell's mistakes in his treatise "Electricity and Magnetism", 19.01.2021 - https://docs.google.com/file/d…98wsyrME/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks for checking in.
Lots of things have changed in my world view, particularly about geopolitical villains.
But I am still under the misguided perception that Coulombs Law is dimensionally consistent, and I see no glaring error in Maxwell's Equations.
I even still believe Rossi has nothing.
Maybe it's just me, and you can call me an idiot if you want.
The existence of matter inside the EVO as a mix of transmuted matter indicates that that matter does not eventually aggregate inside a central black hole.
Not really.
Why, you might ask?
Because the existence of transmuted matter inside an EVO is in question. And "eventually" is an indeterminate time with no real meaning, which a physicist would never use. And even the existence of the EVO is questioned by some. And some people (all people except you?) question whether your "theories" are more than fanciful gobbledygook".
Display Morethe transmuted material exited the EVO in seemingly ransom fashion and yet still managed to conform to the black hole theories that underpin Anti- De Sutter spacetime.
...
The Quark Gluon condensate matter digestion hypothesis process seems to be supported by this new data release and explanation.
...
you can't make Mother nature do what she does not want to do. She wants to do LENR.
...
The sacred geometry slant on this process looks to conform with Twister physics
Sutter spacetime? Ransom? Mother nature is a beeeaaaoootch doing LENR? QGCMD Hypothesis Processes (HP's)? Sacred Slants TP conformity (are these inclined plane twisters)? I'm really confused. Is this more properly considered gobbledygook or word salad?
Bob Greenyer has just understood how the EVO transmutes
Have you ever asked Bob about how he feels about your "interpretation" of his work? I would be really interested in/amused by his response.
A Bob Greenyer Classic Video.
He was absolutely drained at the end
with all the effort he put into it.
Bob Greenyer is the third most brilliant physicist of the modern era (after AA and AR).
His exhaustion speaks volumes about the scientific and mathematical rigor of his observations.
Here is a new "thingy" I discovered that must relate to an EVO. The EVO is composed of "unparticles".
Unparticle physics - Wikipedia
One might add the "Journal of Nuclear Physics", JONP to this problematic list. In fact most posts on JONP now revolve around a purported Zero Point Energy device.
So I am thinking this blog should be renamed "Journal of ZPE Physics", or JOZPEP.
But since Researchgate shamelessly hosts bogus papers from the JONP proprietor and lists massive numbers of fake "full reads", they too should be added to this problematic list as well.
the "Algorythm" is a "green" dance step invented by Al Gore in the 90's. It is danced to the tune of the Hokey Pokey.
"You do the Al Gore Rythm and you turn yourself around, that's what it's all about".
Display MoreDr Rossi,
Reading the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions
in paragraph 5 we understand in the algorythm of your process there is a reverse difference of Entropy, and this is a fact against the third principle of thermodynamic.
How do you reconcile this ? It is important to know, because the reverse difference of Entropy is the source of the Zero Point Energy.
Congratulations for your work,
All the best,
Maria
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for the 100,000 + readings of
http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions
The algorythm of Researchgate registers all the readings, not accounting for repeated readings from the same source or the readings made by the author, so the number of 100000 readings is even more stunning, because absolutely genuine. It gives evidence of the increase of interest from the scientific echelons for the work of your team.
May God bless the work of your team,
Bedy
Martin:
1. yes
2. same algorythm
3. n.a.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giovanni:
Thjis will depend on the specific algorythm we will put in the control system: it is a possible function, though. Good suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
1- 4: the algorythm is more complex, includes also your assumptions
5- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The control system can react to situations the algorythm has been designed for, not to situations that have not been foreseen. Therefore eventually the control system is updated. The parents of Technology are Trial and Error.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Steven N. Karesl:
the answer is yes, but within the control system algorythm.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Display Morehttps://skyshop.mx/en/scientists-simulate-micro-universe/
Scientists simulate micro universe
Research into this subject is being done with the help of atomic Bose Einstein condensates. These condensates can be used to create spacetime conditions that conform with the various spacetime conditions that are allowable under general relativity.
The EVO is a condition of spacetime that has a negative curvature which differs from the ambient universe which has a positive curvature.
From the effects that the EVO demonstrates, that spacetime type looks like one that existed in the early universe.
I always present theories that are being considered by organized science as they might be applied to the conditions that seem to be apparent in the behavior of the EVO.
I do not come up with any theories that are original, but instead discuss theories that already have been recently put forth by organized science. If PhysicsForDummies was more familiar with current thinking in organized science, he would not post such stupid recriminating remarks.
That article was written by a telescope salesman in Mexico. Even in the article it says these BEC's were not universes, and not even close to the same conditions that existed after the big bang. You as always are extrapolating junk pop-sci articles to fantasy conclusions. Not a single person on earth except you thinks you are presenting theories from organized science. Name one qualified individual who thinks you know what you are talking about.