I think I was in a quantum mechanics lecture with "Anonymous".
I remember him yelling out:
"What the hell is the Hamiltonian? Dirac delta function my a$$.
Stick your ψ up your ω"
I think I was in a quantum mechanics lecture with "Anonymous".
I remember him yelling out:
"What the hell is the Hamiltonian? Dirac delta function my a$$.
Stick your ψ up your ω"
What the H-E-Double Toothpicks!
Rossi's sock puppets with the telltale space before the question marks and terrible grammar are even getting upset.
Check out this post.
What the hell can be the function of the Casimir force in the Ecat, as reported in the paper authored by you on Researchgate
Ecat the new fire and long range particle interactions ?
Besides: how can go electrons at c being fermions ?
Can you answer, please ?
DR Campbell concerned about new Brain Virus.
That brain virus has been proliferating for a while on E-cat world.
Where can I find a not too difficult explication of the quantic statuses in a nucleus of an atom ?
Why, just look to the Quantic School for these questions!
And since their highest "full reads" belong to quack pseudoscience authors with a prison record, they obviously don't care about author integrity.
According to Grimms fairy tales all witches wear black.
But real black holes <> "standard model physics fantasy black holes" emit matter at a very high speed. Thus Grimm was more right.
We know that the black hole produced by an EVO produces a spherical event horizon because we see a hollow crenellated spherical ball of material that is composed of mostly transmuted elements.
Who are "We" Axil? Can you name a person who agrees with you? I'll give you 20 bucks if you can give me a verifiable reference who is at all qualified and thinks you know what you are talking about. And no, an ECW high school dropout Rossi fanboy does not qualify.
Negative mass of the EVO can explain why the EVO can fly around as strange radiation.
I don't think so. Because there is no negative mass. And because you know nothing.
This post reeks of arrogance, false pride, and self aggrandisement.
I don't think so.
Please be aware that physicists do not understand the definition of information. Hence all papers about information are blatant nonsense.
This "conservation of information" nonsense came after I studied physics, I believe. I always thought it was woo. For example, white noise has a tremendous amount of information? I could be wrong since I never studied this.
If you send it in a tachyon packet, 10 billion years in the past to the same location, it will be about 10 billion light years away due to the shift of the galaxy through and within space in that time.
This is actually done right now.
TACHYONIZE YOUR OWN ITEMS IN YOUR HOME - TACHYON LIVING ZERO POINT
Probably you could become too a maker if you could share with us some of your own Lenr postulates.
I believe if someone can't develop a theory with a strong mathematical basis, they shouldn't be making fake "theories".
I do not feel qualified to be making such postulates. I only have a BS in Engineering Physics from Cornell, and I work with mathematical algorithms and physics related phenomena. But I have never really worked in pure physics. So that does not qualify me to make broad based speculations. I do feel qualified to judge certain people as unqualified to make their broad all-knowing statements. And I think those type of people are really bad for our goal of getting LENR research accepted.
If you had watched Leonard Susskind video, you would understand, and you might also learn something.
Did Lenny discuss how to seperate the split EVO entangled pair by 10 billion light years? I could watch the video but I would prefer an explanation from an "expert".
I must admit that if no one understand this I must be doing something wrong..
The first step towards recovery is admitting you have a problem
If an EVO splits in two, with the two being entangled, the pair could be separated through 10 billion light years and they could be used to instantly communicate via a wormhole over ten billon light years. (See video)
How do you plan to separate these entangled universes EVOs by 10 billion light years?
If you plan on moving it there, this would be a "timelike" interval.
You cannot create a "spacelike" separation by splitting an EVO and moving it.
Since the Universe is not much more than 10 billion years old (well if you believe the big bang), an entangled EVO at 10 billion light years would have had to have split in the relatively early times of the universe and somehow they miraculously accelerated to near light speed away from each other.
This seems weird to me, but maybe that's just me.
However I think this does prove that your theories are "spaced-out-like".
Edit: On second thought, your theories are more "loony-timelike"
Rossi has apparently rapidly progressed to become one of the world's top tennis players:
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your kind wishes, that I share with you.
My progress in tennis is inversely proportional to the technological progress of the Ecat.
Happy New Year also to you and your family,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
By using a exciton polariton condensate, at system can be created that has a negative spacetime curvature. This type of system which acts as an analog universe is what an EVO is.
New Year, same ol' BS
I beg to disagree. Th, when it is destroyed (fission/spallation) we see these smaller products. The SAM team has proposed this for a few years now that this is precisely the case. All those smaller elements come from a large one. So I beg to disagree strongly. For more info see our presentation or read our book or visit the website with all sources.
Structuredatom.org
Please don't disagree with Axil. It's not worth the heartache.
Worst an EVO is a mythical object. Axil then goes on to surround the myth with more misinterpreted references to scientific reports. He claims authority by reference to thing he claims that only he understands. He points to the right phenomenon, then does everything possible to perverts its understanding.
He then insults anyone who calls out his word salad as the gibberish it is, and posts pages and pages of garbage to obfuscate any possible argument. I think Axil is a mythical object. Perhaps the Loch Mess Monster, or a Chimera (half bull, half dung beetle)
You really should stop bloviating, you're only embarrassing yourself.