]
That picture is obviously a monolayer BEC. However there is only one Q-ball in this condensate. This solution to this arrangement is known as "16 particles-in-a-box"
]
That picture is obviously a monolayer BEC. However there is only one Q-ball in this condensate. This solution to this arrangement is known as "16 particles-in-a-box"
Now that Q-balls have been verified by speculation in a theory paper, we need to extrapolate their potential properties to the fullest extent possible. Q-balls must have negative mass, form room temperature superconducting BEC's, involve electro-weak unification, and last but not least, contain a complete universe caused by vacuum decay. These properties are completely referenced by Current Physics, which we know LENR researchers foolishly do not accept.
I have had some formal training in nuclear engineering.
I believe you absolutely do not have a formal training in nuclear engineering. You may have read some wiki articles or attended a lecture with a buddy or something. But it is obvious you don't know basic math. You could have not passed an intermediate calculus class, let alone an engineering curriculum. This is all in my humble opinion however.
. The space metric "g" changes in a non linear way for each added rotation to a mass. This cold be found even by a 12 year old that looks at tabulated nuclear data.
Boy, we expect a lot from our 12 year olds around here. From understanding Axil's rantings to tabulated nuclear data. So simple, a child could do it.
All my theories are referenced in current science.
I have a serious question Axil. One that can't be answered by links to wikipedia. If you think your "theories" are based on current science, that means that expert physicists, mathematicians, and scientists that work on and formulate, and use "current science" every day should agree with you. Maybe not all, but at least a few. Can you name one such person on earth that agrees with you? Think hard about this please. Even crackpots don't agree with you. (They have their own crackpot theories).
It has just bein discovered, that the polariton has negative mass. This means that the polariton can create a vacuum type field when it condenses into a Bose Einstein condensate that has negative curvature. So a hyperbolic shaped vacuum state with a saddle shape is formed. This is the opposite to the close spherical shape of our universe that has positive curvature.
These two types of vacuum states will annihilate each other if not separated. So a domain wall forms that keeps these two vacuum states separated.
No it hasn't been discovered that "polaritons have negative mass". There is only one really questionable paper about this, and others in the past have been debunked. Also it is only "certain" polaritons and the polaritons are quasi-particles. It is just pretty much a mathematical gimmick that they exhibit mathematical characteristics related to negative mass, but it is not a fundamental property of any real particle to have negative mass. Like everything Axil, you read the wackiest articles you can find and assume everything is not only validated and true, but that these conclusions can be projected into grandiose new theories. Total bunk.
Axil's understanding of both "current science" and "LENR" appears to be unique....
of course, there may be some meaning lost in translation. from another language
I believe Axil is from the Isle of Gibber and is a native speaker of their tongue.
Could you explain this to a 12 year old?
I can.
"Little Billy, Mr. Axil is just joking. He says funny non-sense stuff just for laughs."
The EVO seems to be producing small black holes and as such may be like a structure that may have come into existence during the first fractions of seconds after the big bang. These primordial EVOs might be the same as fermi balls.
The strange thing about this EVO thread is that it harbors less accurate information than either the "clearance items" or the "playground" threads.
The Flat Earth Society website arguments are downright scientific compared to posts here.
I've given up on trying to figure out what "NGU" even is. Similar questions get "yes" and "no" answers.
So are you still giving Rossi the benefit of the doubt?
P.S. NGU is a "Nonfunctioning Garbage Unit.
Eyes are not needed, but logic is.
Logic rules like Fantasy = Fact?
I've given up on trying to figure out what "NGU" even is. Similar questions get "yes" and "no" answers.
You should ask Axil. He knows all the details and announced the absolute fact that it was generating light used by the solar panels. The fact that Rossi denied this later is irrelevant because Axil typically knows more than the inventors about their technology.
Does anyone know what happened to Carl-Oscar Gullström? He was at Uppsala and wrote his theories backing Rossi back in 2017. I found him on some paper shortly after in 2018, then "poof", he disappeared from the face of the earth. He is mentioned in Rossi's bogus SLRPI paper, but is not specified as an author. I can't find an active LinkedIn or other social media. I think this is odd for a PHD candidate to disappear like this.
Did he have a complete nervous breakdown after working with Rossi?
Check into a monastery?
Was he sucked into another EVO universe predicted by one of Axil's theories?
Did Rossi lock him in his Rome dungeon, feed him moldy bread, and force him to write that SLRPI paper, 50 shades of gray style, with no acknowledgement?
I'm actually only partially kidding to suggest someone should file a missing persons report, get him on some milk cartons, and notify Interpol.
I wouldn't totally put it past Rossi to have his buddies "take care of the situation" if Carl had turned against Rossi.
The swath of destruction of anyone associated with Rossi over the years is astounding. Just to mention a few:
Carl-Oscar Goneström (evaporated)
Mats Lewan (career near destroyed)
Giuseppe Levi (reputation destroyed)
James A. Bass (missing? virtual person?)
Sergio Focardi (still seriously dead)
Maddalena Pascucci (Tennis anyone? Not anymore)
Yes, Andrea Rossi with his 1 MW system in 2011 🤣
A singularity is a point in Axil's brain which makes him believe he understands more about physics than any other mortal being.
This is giberish.
We could define the rest mass as having that value necessary to explain the energy left when an object is not moving. In an equation, we would have
rest mass = E0 / c2 ,
Rest mass is nonsequitor. You posted giberish about negative mass, saying it comes from a square root of itself or something. One can't argue with nonsense since there is no coherent train of thought. You are not "justifying" negative mass by adding your own (+/-) in front of E=mc^2.
Here's a couple more.
Display Moremass is a theoretical concept in physics and mathematics. It's the result of taking the square root
particle.
We have the expression
E = (+-)m c2 ,
for the energy that an object has due to its mass alone.
This is the most brilliant thing I ever read.
You are saying mass is the square root of mass.
m = m^1/2.
And Einstein forgot the (+/-)
Who could argue with these postulates?
One of its important characteristics is its negative mass. Negative mass is a gateway to the concept of the tachyon condensate.
We've been through this before. A tachyon field has an IMAGINARY mass, not negative mass. That is a very different thing. Complex numbers are an extremely basic math concept, and one which it is very obvious you do not understand. Not understanding the difference between negative and imaginary numbers disqualifies you from making up new physics theories.
Besides the fact that these tachyonic fields are simply a math concept with no evidence at all that tachyons exist. BEC's DO NOT have negative mass. That is a ridiculous statement. There is nothing at all known to have negative mass.