As usual, the 'Clarifier' doesn't clarify his useless response.
You still owe me an answer, instead You are accusing me for the fails, which You do...
Maybe, You are ... 12 or 13 ?
Posts by clarifier
-
-
WOW. Let's hope, this progress will be much faster, than the other approaches:
https://www.sciencealert.com/a…erpetual=yes&limitstart=1 -
One approach would be to only include LENR efforts which have been replicated in peer reviewed journals with an impact factor of __x_______fill-in-the-blank______________.
That would throw out a few efforts, especially those that are only business oriented or "in mercato veritas".
Nonsense. Like all the time.
Answer my question first ( instead of accusing me, to refuse any clarification )What is Your position towards Rossi ?
-
Display More
I had postulated something like that several weeks ago, and no one commented on it. It seems possible that simple thermometers would be less susceptible to EMI corruption. It's astonishing that folks who are saying there's an ongoing error taking place are pointing to the equipment generating errors of more than 500degrees Farenheit.
-----------------------------------------------------
Rossi E-Cat SK Demo Discussion
- [email protected]
- Feb 20th 2019
- Rossi & Industrial Heat
Post
(Quote from JedRothwell)***Is it possible that whatever tools are used to measure heat are disrupted by Strange Radiation or some other thing emitted by these LENR devices? So, a person walking into a room where 1MW of heat is supposedly being generated, he doesn't feel nearly that much heat. But his readings are showing all kinds of heat. That would explain why there is an opening for a wily con artist, why Arata's demo was unconvincing, and that this "pseudo-heat" generated can barely run a si…
You need to clarify what Your position is...
-
There is evidence that he himself is convinced. He works very hard, for long hours. I know people who have spent a lot time with him, and that is what they say. It does not seem to be for show. If he were nothing but a scam artist, he could make a fake reactor with much less effort.
Okay, that isn't proof, but I think it indicates he believes some of his own claims.
Really??????????
You personally DO KNOW ( REALLY KNOWING, NOT MEETING ONCE) people, who KNOW Rossi (REALLY KNOWING, NOT MEETING ONCE)...
-
Have You forgotten, that I clarified it ? And that You still owe me an answer instead ? Don't throw with stones, while sitting in a glasshouse...
-
Quote
History keeps on repeating. That's what certifications are for. And that's why this device will never ever get certified.
If he once claimed, that it is, then he must have been lying.
And if he was lying about this, I dare to derive the following:
Everything he ever said and did does serve only one purpose: MASSIVE FRAUD.
-
You are mistaken. He never offered the money back. He claimed he did, but he did not.
Useless to talk to this guy, seems like a copy of Adrian.
-
Oh, my god....Axil 2.0
Post moved to prevent a war. Shane D
-
I did not include it because I did not know what he meant. I thought it was some foreign phrase. Now I know. Not all of us have the time, or desire to parse these things like you, especially Rossi related content.
Alan had a good suggestion...time for both to tone it down. With so many other active, and serious topics going on, Rossi to me is becoming a distant memory anyways.
I like this one :
QuoteRossi to me is becoming a distant memory anyways
Yeah. I totally agree.
-
Display More
What I said, .... man, I meant it.
***Then why did you hide behind your supposedly poor english to just say "blah blah" After being asked to Clarify... when
what you MEANT was actually commented on by the moderator as "a bit strong ". You're not a clarifier , you're an obfuscator and you should change your screen name.
Nothing was removed by any moderator, I removed it...
***When the moderator was defending you, he conveniently left out the CONTEXT of the statement because when the CONTEXT is removed, your statement is relatively innocuous. Now that you actually DID clarify about the CONTEXT, the moderator says it's a bit much. And yet, even now, you say you meant it.
And, yes... I lost my patience with that troll, that conman, that total crackpot.
***Understandable, to be calling Rossi all that stuff, though it's "a bit much" . When you were asked to clarify you refused, which shows that your intention was to cause trouble.
And this is the right thread to spit it all out.
***Then do the spitting. When someone asks why the spit came so close to their own ear and asks if it was aimed at them, asks the Clarifier to Clarify, your response was to increase the invective. It was an Adam Henry maneuver.
I also told You, You should repeat reading it, until You understand it.
***Then I am telling You, EXACTLY the same thing. Now that the moderator has identified the context as "a bit much, even for a Rossi thread", it is time to point out that You are the one who didn't understood it, the one who didn't get my point, the one who had been saying "a bit much" for this forum.
Maybe You understood it, but You did not get my point.
***After reviewing your comment, your ensuing behavior, and your other responses, I understood perfectly that you were trying to cause trouble. Don't start nuthin', won't BE nuthin.
No nothing at all.
***I understand plenty.
HE JERKS OFF WHILE IMAGINING "ALL THE PEOPLE" GETTING TROLLED BY HIM. That's what I said.
***That is NOT what you said. It MIGHt BE what you wanted people to understand, but it was removed enough from clarity that it could easily have been misconstrued. When asked to clariy, you who call yourself the clarifier refused to clarify. That makes you a simple Adam Henry.
I never said, he is jerking of all the other people...
***Your post was off kilter enough to need clarification on more than one item and you refused. Now that it IS clear what you were saying, others can see that you were simply behaving in a juvenile fashion and pushing the envelope of provocation. Look up the word "troll" at dictionary.com and you'll see that the internet term is centered around the intention to provoke. You CERTAINLY intended to provoke, so the term "troll" applies to you.
man.... but, if You are the only one, feeling insulted by this...
***Looks like even the moderator said it was "a bit much". So your faux surprise can stop and you can drop the hollyweird acting.
I can just speculate, what lies beyond that...
***There you go, jumping straight back into making this an insult fest. If your intention isn't crystal clear to the moderators by this point then it's only up to the lurkers.
... I somehow cannot really believe, that Your one and only concern is "about the "tone" of remarks on this forum"...
***I have plenty of other concerns. My concern about the 'tone' of remarks on this forum was because I was accused of making it worse, even when it becomes obvious that the true Adam Henry trolls operating on this forum are simply on the misanthRossist side, guys like yourself.
It seems more likely, that You are nothing else but a Rossi-Supporter.
***I'm plenty else. I don't even count myself as a Rossi Supporter. If I did I'd be all over the jerks like you who constantly insult him. And what the hell would be wrong to be a Rossi supporter, anyways? It couldn't be any worse than a skeptopathic Adam Henry who introduces sexual innuendo as part of the palate of insults and then hides behind piss poor english.
IF SO: Deal with that like a man and stop running to the moderators while crying like a p...y.
***What about If NOT SO? Can I key up on adam henries such as yourself? Ya wanna hide behind piss poor writing so that you can get away with throwing out a brilliant sexual innuendo towards Rossiphiles? That makes YOU the p....y.
Post edited: even by Rossi (lowered) standards, that is a bit strong. Shane
***Maybe the clarifier will take that as a sign that he aint much of a clarifier.
Blowing up Your post by quoting all the passages, which You did not understand ? Nice try, keep on, self-awareness comes step by step.
Look, nowhere is written, that I said, "he jerks of other people". But that is what You understood. So, my english cannot be that bad, to mix up "he jerks of" and "he jerks You off".
And, I could also have chosen non sexual comparisons...but then You would have never replied ( I assume ).
And this is also a weird thing. I leave it to You.
Anyway..., I still wonder, if the "cleaniness" of this board is Your one and only concern.
Or do You simply defend Rossi ?
Or Do You just want to play "pro and contra" ?
What exactly is Your point ?
-
@ kevmo...
What I said, .... man, I meant it.
Nothing was removed by any moderator, I removed it...
And, yes... I lost my patience with that troll, that conman, that total crackpot.
And this is the right thread to spit it all out.
I also told You, You should repeat reading it, until You understand it.
Maybe You understood it, but You did not get my point.
No nothing at all.
HEJERKS OFF WHILE IMAGINING "ALL THE PEOPLE" GETTING TROLLED BY HIM. That's what I said.
I never said, he is jerking of all the other people... man.... but, if You are the only one, feeling insulted by this... I can just speculate, what lies beyond that...... I somehow cannot really believe, that Your one and only concern is "about the "tone" of remarks on this forum"...
It seems more likely, that You are nothing else but a Rossi-Supporter.IF SO: Deal with that like a man and stop running to the moderators while crying like a p...y.
Post edited: even by Rossi (lowered) standards, that is a bit strong. Shane
-
Whichever way the BH is oriented there would be a halo visible, gravity bends light from the accretion disc to make it appear so, whether viewed 'pole' on or towards the equator.
similar to what I wanted to state, but the question is still a valid one: Which perspective are we, the observers, sitting at?
-
Then it is simply obvious that you intended to throw out yet another insult that starts all the crap again. Yet it is the misanthRossist crowd that is so touchy about the "tone" of this forum. What a bunch of hypocrites and whiners. Blah Blah indeed.
And what is Your position ?
-
The view is most likely pole on since the accretion disk disk circles the equator of the black hole.
This does not really explain the ligther-darker sections ( which, in contrast, really indicate, that one side is nearer towards us, than the other.
-
Gee, for someone who calls himself 'clarifier' you sure seem to not be much of a clarified, blisters and all.
bla bla.
-
Then why don't you clarify your j....of comment that was quoted and tell us exactly what you did mean when you used the word 'troll'.
I suggest, You repeat reading my post on and on until You get, what I mean... I cannot believe, to who I am talking right now...
-
Let's get this straight. You guys bad mouth Rossi all the time. No problem, the guy set himself up for it. But why do you have to go past that and start trouble by calling Rossiphiles trolls and worse? Don't start nuthin' won't BE nuthin'. Here you are starting trouble but the misanthrossist jerks are the first to whine when someone comes in and counterpunches.
For a "let's get this straight" You are way far away from the intention of my post, let there be understanding at all.
-
Sergey Godin was disappointed in the cold nuclear fusion .... 30 years and no perspective .. wrote on the FB. I invite all physicists to study my theory on geology, there in the lithosphere LENR is constantly going!
How Do You know ? Is there a way to experimentally verify Your statement ?
-
Display More
As I predicted, he is about to add A.I.
-
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM
Roth:
Well, I think that part of the control system could be defined A.I., but a full application of A.I. will have to be developed and I already am in contact with a Swedish engineer to develop this part of R&D. For sure this is an issue we are following with great attention.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nothing new.
Look, maybe, You get his strategy.
- He said, hee needs the carnot cycle first. Since then he never ever admitted to have reached a stable carnot cycle or updated about the development on this.- He said, he is working on the gas turbine. He never continued any work on the gas turbine... and/or did never post an update about the development.
- Suddenly a "quark x" became a "quark SK" ... all in parallel to add AI ( who the heck would add AI to this shit, when even nuclear plants do not run on it ) ...
(These are just 3 projects, with either state of "r&d","work in progress" or more likely, just Rossisayings.
BUT,
BUT,
BUT,
WHAT NOW AGAIN ?
Direct energy from the plasma ?
... IIRC, this was already the case 3 years ago:
remember ...Can it produce energy: YES.Can it produce thrust: YES.
So, Rossi is running in his circle again, once more...
... comparing this to agile development ala scrum, we are missing working products for about 4 sprints now...
, such a project would already hsve been stopped, if run by a PROPER product owner.
So, to anyone, who still cannot see it: It is just a repetition, as it was all the time, only the words changed.
ONCE more...
...this old creature j....s of, by the amount of people, who still deliberately let themselves troll by him.
And there are so many, he surely has a lot of blisters...
-
Andrea Rossi
April 4, 2019 at 8:39 AM