Fairy tales go on on Planet Rossi and ECW...all energy problems of mankind will be solved soon... ECat SK now can last for 50 years or more (because Rossi said so)
even better, that You chose a post, where axil is involved. This adds the necessary grain ( truck ) of salt to it.
Anyway, in the end Rossi's charade came to that end, wich definitely convinced me, not to give a slightest ..... about him anymore.
Sadly, I also will be reading and posting in here less and less.
You all know.... I realized, Adrian suddenly got VERY QUIET... interesting, heh ?
I personally would no take the risk or the aggravation at 20% but at 50%, it might start tickling my greedy bone.
I wanted to know, whether this sudden increase makes You believe in Rossi more or less ....
The saving rate is up to 50% now/
Yes, Rossi says this. What about Your personal opinion ?
Hi again.
Another question is:
How many people saw, what they expected from this "presentation" ???
I`m sorry, but I cannot believe in this esoterical magic.
Look at this one:
https://e-catworld.com/2019/01…-e-cat-sk-thefutureisnow/
"extraction of zero point energy"
"plasma ball with protons inside and electrons on the outside"....
...WTF? This is no longer a page which should be visited.
No. The event horizon is defined by Mr. Schwarzschild.
Can we decide in here, what to do to Adrian, if Rossi fails again ?
No point to arguie about, to be seen, at least by me.
You miss the point: Black hole people believe that information must be conserved inside a black hole what is absolute nonsense!
aha. That was the topic to be argued about.
Basically I favorize Your point of view. Nothing survives in a black hole, so why should information be an exception?
Talking ala Shannon, information is a degree of entropy, right ?
I wonder if we can ask for a new subthread.... BIGGEST Rossi fails.
There we could collect his biggest fails , rating them, comparing them, and having even more fun ....
...
and we would have a protocol of his nonsense, easily to find, in one place.
@ Alan: What Do You think?
Yes, Shannon.
And anyway, who are You to critizize either Shannon or Hawking ?
You are right: It just proves that the involved people have absolutely no clue about what information is....
But You do ?
How can You even dare to expose such criticism ?
In a asteroid like body that is only 18 miles in diameter, it is too small for the standard heat sources that are assumed to make a celestial body geologically active.
For example, Pluto which is geologically active was assumed to produce heat through the generation of ice as it solidifies over 4.6 billion years. Such a claim is not possible when it comes to such a small body as Ultima Thule happens to be. Other reasons that are given are also precluded because of a small body size
Which other "standard" heat sources do You know ?
https://www.inverse.com/articl…-mission-nasa-light-curve
ultima thule has no light curve. The most likely explanation is that an energy source is producing a dusty atmosphere. That energy source must be LENR.
We will know what is happening in a few more days.
...
..
.
must ? Why ?
You have no evidence that it is true.
Adrian, were you ever rational?
...
..
.
Adrian simply turns the coin around.
Most of us Rossi critical people try to look/ask for (empirical, physically correct) evidence for the claims, that Rossi makes about his "invention".
Adrian sits on the exact opposite position: He wants us to show him (MAYBE empirical, physically correct) evidence for Rossi being a fraud.
But there is one big advantage on our side of the coin: There are 17 accusations against Rossi in his past.
He wanted to dump toxic waste into some place, not intended for this...
This is only one reason, and in connection to his claimed "free, clean, unlimited energy" by an e-cat it sonds totally paradox.
TOTALLY.
--->
A guy who did not gave a ..... where to dump toxic waste, suddenly became a "saviour of nature with the allmighty device" ?
Please read that sentence above, again and again, loudly.... until You really get it.
He is making his claims since 10 years, yet NOTHING was presented, which can be trusted in terms of his "reliability" in his past, let there be alone his credibility.
So... dear Adrian: We have no direct evidence, that Rossi's device does not work as he tries to tell us.
But we have at least 17 proven reasons, to be VERY VERY VERY skeptical about ANY WORD comming out of Rossi's mouth.
Lobster who ?
Display MorePlasma Resonance.
Starting from the Boltzmann transport equation, a formula is derived for the rate of change of electron density in a gas plasma. With its aid a study is made of the oscillations of electron density (about the steady state value) in a discharge confined between parallel plates. The oscillations are described in terms of a set of normal modes characteristic of the plasma under study. An expression is obtained for the impedance of the discharge as a function of frequency: for the one case calculated in detail, this formula gives a resonance in power absorption at a frequency of 0.7 of the plasma resonance frequency corresponding to the central electron density.
https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.103.845
Wow, do not tell this to axil 
...
..
.
You say this, as answer to a description, which definitely sees a plasma ?
