Just coincidences indeed. What else?
Walter Pegeto
Member
- Member since Feb 28th 2019
- Last Activity:
Posts by Walter Pegeto
-
-
One has to be impressed by the determination and loyalty of Rossi followers.
Have you noticed how many similarities there are with conspiracy theorists, anti-semitic right wing extremists and pseudoscientific no-vax movements?
-
The fact that someone like this could supposedly write a high-level physics paper "with the
"High level physics paper"?
are you joking? A non peer-reviewed pre-print with more than 50 citations of pseudoscience papers?
-
"Indagini che richiedono l’impiego di uomini e materiali. Tramite Malagoli, Ferrari è ancora alla ricerca di denaro da destinare alla ff. Ho appena scorso la tesi; è piena di omissioni importanti. In 60 pagine non figura una sola funzione di eccitazione. Come si fa a scrivere una reazione nucleare senza riportare la sua funzione di eccitazione? Se avessi tempo varrebbe la pena di fare una review. Ma non merita; al massimo qualche nota, se viene a piovere e sto in casa.
Basta una tesi del genere per laurearsi in fisica a Bologna?"
https://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2019/11/17/oca5/#comment-97669
-
Loris Ferrari? Really?
"Anche loro, il 28 come il 6 ottobre, hanno la bocca cucita (e lo dicono apertamente...). Il professor Loris Ferrari, fisico teorico all'Università di Bologna, vorrebbe parlare ma dice di essere «vincolato da un accordo di riservatezza»"
https://www.focus.it/scienza/scienze/e-cat-chi-e-il-misterioso-cliente-di-andrea-rossi
https://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2019/11/17/oca5/#comment-97655
-
Rossi blog
L. Listenbetter
January 14, 2020 at 4:05 AM
Claire
January 13, 2020 at 8:24 AM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
What I appreciated most in your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions
is the understanding of the fact that even if the electron is a fermion, and therefore cannot travel at c, it is possible that it has a zitterbewegung ( vibrations ) with the speed of light, maintaining its fermionic translation speed.
This is a revolution in the electron’s potentials concept
This is nonsense.
Zitterbewegung is nothing else than a movement.
And therefore never can be luminal.
It is forced to by subluminal.
-
Fred Zoepfl added a comment on Rossi researchgate paper citing a post on JONP
"Claire de Loon:"
Claire January 13, 2020 at 8:24 AM
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi: What I appreciated most in your paper http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions is the understanding of the fact that even if the electron is a fermion, and therefore cannot travel at c, it is possible that it has a zitterbewegung ( vibrations ) with the speed of light, maintaining its fermionic translation speed. This is a revolution in the electron’s potentials concept
-
From Fred Zoepfl recent comment on Rossi researchgate "paper"
"Rossi's preposterous preprint continues to receive "Recommendations" from some of the most obscure and irrelevant sources imaginable. Some recent "recommenders" include experts in teaching, transportation planning, mathematical analysis, PCR and gene sequencing, transducers and acoustics, biomechanics, legal theory, environmental impact assessment, literature studies, materials characterization, mechanical engineering, digital marketing, cryptography, psychological counseling, and blood analysis. Their academic institutions include the Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Universidad Estadual de Maringa, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Mustansiriya University, Adana Science and Technology University, University of Baghdad, University of Dayala, KLN College of Engineering, Tashkent State Technical University, DAV College for Girls, etc., etc., etc. Obviously, these are all totally fake recommendations"
"If anyone were to contact a representative sample of these "recommenders," I think they would quickly discover that none of these researchers has ever even heard of "Doctor" Rossi or his bogus nuclear physics preprint. Happy New Year to all the many readers of this comment section."
After one year no peer reviewed journal has published this pre-print
-
I looked up the number 23, and it does have some meaning in numerology. It may explain why Rossi has 23 employees:
His "paper" on researchgate has also 23 references!
-
-
how is Camillo going with hot fusion nowadays?
Not nowdays but few years ago:
ITER is an excellent example of a successful international cooperation. An example of SCIENCE WITHOUT BORDER, that can realize
a very ambitious project (more than 14 billions $!) concentrating in one aim the efforts of many highly specialized workers,
overcoming the national egoism.
-
....
"A practical embodiment of the inventive apparatus, installed on October 16, 2007, is at present
'perfectly operating 24 hours per day, and provides an amount of heat sufficient to heat the factory of the
Company EON of via Carlo Ragazzi (Province of Ferrara). "
"Figures 2-5 show data measured on January 30, 2008 which basically demonstrate that the invention 10 actually provides a true nuclear cold fusion."
The claim that nickel and proton nuclei can melt under the experimental conditions described is contradicted by official data published by the IAEA
https://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2015/12/17/come-eravamo/
"L’affermazione che nuclei di nickel e protoni possono fondere nelle condizioni sperimentali descritte è contraddetta da dati ufficiali pubblicati dalla IAEA (Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data) I due grafici che seguono rappresentano le sezioni d’urto [La sezione d’urto di una reazione nucleare è una misura della probabilità che la reazione avvenga in determinate condizioni standard. Viene misurata in unità barn] per le reazioni 58Ni (p, γ) 59Cu e
62Ni (p, γ) 63Cu. 58Ni e 62Ni (percentuale isotopica 68.1 % e 3.6 % rispettivamente) sono i due isotopi naturali presi in considerazione nel PA."
-
Takahashi and some more Japanese teams do NiHxy LENR since more than 10 years. The same holds for Parkhomov and Celani. All have clear effects 1000X above the error bar.
More than 10 years yes, but not as early as 1992/1994
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227329527_Anomalous_heat_production_in_Ni-H_systems
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergio_Focardi
"Gli studi sulla fusione fredda Nichel-Idrogeno (Ni-H)Schema del reattore nichel-idrogeno ideato da Piantelli e Focardi per la misura dell'eventuale calore in eccesso[8]
Nel 1989 Francesco Piantelli, biofisico dell'Università degli Studi di Siena, durante alcuni esperimenti con campioni di materiale organico[9], rilevò un'anomala produzione di calore.[10] Comunicò il fenomeno da lui osservato a Focardi e i due decisero di creare un gruppo di lavoro cui si aggiunse Roberto Habel, membro dell'INFN presso l'Università di Cagliari,[11][12][13] al fine di approfondire la causa di quell'anomalia termica.[14]
Dopo circa tre anni, gli studi approdarono a significativi risultati permettendo la costruzione di un reattore Nichel-Idrogeno sufficientemente efficiente. Passarono altri due anni di sperimentazioni e finalmente il 20 febbraio 1994, in una conferenza stampa presso l'aula magna dell'Università di Siena, venne annunciata la messa a punto di un differente processo di produzione di energia per mezzo di Reazioni Nucleari a Bassa Energia (LENR)[15], profondamente differente da quello fatto da Fleischmann e Pons[16][17]."
-
there are a lot more non-Italian players and possiblities in the NIHLenr sample space than you allege.
Surely, there are now many players in NI-H LENR research, but I said something very different, i.e. that there is absolutely no doubt that Piantelli and Focardi were the first researchers of Ni-H LENR in gas-metal systems.
Consequently, it's utterly ridiculous to affirm that later (claimed) "successes" in this field have nothing to do with their work.
Again, either Ni-H does not exist (in agreement with mainstream media and mainstream scientific community) or Rossi and Focardi had something, it's not so difficult to understand!
-
Walter is really straining his faulty "only two possible rational scenarios" logic to ignore this `100% certainty.
I understand that you have some problems in following the timeline of events.
Who, when and where started the Ni-H saga ?
Piantelli and Focardi, early '90, Siena and Bologna.
Consequently how, on earth, is it possible that the Rossi and Focardi first E-Cats have nothing to do with NI-H(gas) systems ?
Either Ni-H does not exist or Rossi had something, it's not too difficult to understand!
-
We really need some original thinkers, they are what progress in science demands.
I agree but beware of self-published or predatory journals
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03759-y
https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=21206&tip=sid
"Scope Nature* is a weekly international journal publishing the finest peer-reviewed research in all fields of science and technology on the basis of its originality, importance, interdisciplinary interest, timeliness, accessibility, elegance and surprising conclusions. Nature also provides rapid, authoritative, insightful and arresting news and interpretation of topical and coming trends affecting science, scientists and the wider public."
*Nature magazine H index is 1996
-
Now, he was doing this par excellence from the very beginning, in those early tests.
Actually, saying "Ross has nothing" automatically means not only that "Rossi had nothing since the beginning" but also tha Ni-H LENR in gas-metal systems does not exist. Piantelli and Focardi started in the early 90s(*) this kind of research, consequently we have only two possible rational scenarios:
1) Rossi had nothing since the beginning and NiH LENR does not exist
2) NI-H exists and Rossi and Focardi had something since the beginning
Naturally, for the 99.9% of the scientific community only the first scenario is realistic and acceptable
-
Rossi may have cooked something without knowing the recipe..exactly
The possibility that Rossi by mistake found real LENR is about the same as the probability that fifty monkeys with typewriters (computer for you modern types) would replicate Shakespeare.
-
No. He had no secret sauce recipe... he had no recipe... just serendipity,, or not..
I repeat the question, are you joking ?
He had no recipe implies obviously that he had nothing since the beginning. What the heck does "Just serendipity, or not" mean ?
-
What Wyttenbach is saying makes sense to me..
he may have had something but now has nothing
Are you joking ? Has he forgotten or lost the secret sauce recipe ?
https://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/realacci-ermete/#comment-50819
