Gregory Byron Goble Verified User
  • Male
  • Member since Mar 3rd 2014
  • Last Activity:

Posts by Gregory Byron Goble

    Fleischmann knows of Surfaced Enhanced Raman Scattering and LENR nano plasmonics in wet cell.


    QUOTE


    The discovery of SERS has a relatively short history. It was accidentally discovered by Fleischmann and co-workers in 1974 during measurements of the Raman scattering of pyridine on rough silver electrodes, (1) and they ascribed the enhancement to a surface-area effect. The phenomenon was identified independently by Jeanmaire and Van Duyne (2) and by Albrecht and Creighton (3) in 1977, both of whom suggested enhancement factors (EFs) of 105–106. The connection with plasmon excitation was suggested by Albrecht and Creighton as a resonant Raman effect involving plasmon excitation, as proposed earlier by Philpott. (4) Subsequently, the connection of SERS intensities to enhanced fields arising from localized surface plasmons in nanostructured metals was noted by Moskovits. (5) Forty-five years later, tens of thousands of research papers have been published on SERS, (6) which discuss in great detail elements of the theory behind it, the design of a wide variety of (mostly but not only metallic) enhancing substrates, and their implementation in a wide variety of applications. Indeed, SERS has become a research field in its own right, as a source of exciting scientific phenomena, as well as one of the most sensitive analytical techniques currently available.

    Article

    "Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering"

    Judith Langer, Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi, Javier Aizpurua, Ramon A. Alvarez-Puebla, Baptiste Auguié, Jeremy J. Baumberg, Guillermo C. Bazan, Steven E. J. Bell, Anja Boisen, Alexandre G. Brolo, Jaebum Choo, Dana Cialla-May, Volker Deckert, Laura Fabris, Karen Faulds, F. Javier García de Abajo, Royston Goodacre, Duncan Graham, Amanda J. Haes, Christy L. Haynes, Christian Huck, Tamitake Itoh, Mikael Käll, Janina Kneipp, Nicholas A. Kotov, Hua Kuang, Eric C. Le Ru, Hiang Kwee Lee, Jian-Feng Li, Xing Yi Ling, Stefan A. Maier, Thomas Mayerhöfer, Martin Moskovits, Kei Murakoshi, Jwa-Min Nam, Shuming Nie, Yukihiro Ozaki, Isabel Pastoriza-Santos, Jorge Perez-Juste, Juergen Popp, Annemarie Pucci, Stephanie Reich, Bin Ren, George C. Schatz, Timur Shegai, Sebastian Schlücker, Li-Lin Tay, K. George Thomas, Zhong-Qun Tian, Richard P. Van Duyne, Tuan Vo-Dinh, Yue Wang, Katherine A. Willets, Chuanlai Xu, Hongxing Xu, Yikai Xu, Yuko S. Yamamoto, Bing Zhao, and Luis M. Liz-Marzán*

    Cite this: ACS Nano 2020, 14, 1, 28–117

    Publication Date:September 3, 2019

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b04224

    Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society


    The discovery of the enhancement of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on nanostructured metal surfaces is a landmark in the history of spectroscopic and analytical techniques. Significant experimental and theoretical effort has been directed toward understanding the surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect and demonstrating its potential in various types of ultrasensitive sensing applications in a wide variety of fields. In the 45 years since its discovery, SERS has blossomed into a rich area of research and technology, but additional efforts are still needed before it can be routinely used analytically and in commercial products. In this Review, prominent authors from around the world joined together to summarize the state of the art in understanding and using SERS and to predict what can be expected in the near future in terms of research, applications, and technological development. This Review is dedicated to SERS pioneer and our coauthor, the late Prof. Richard Van Duyne, whom we lost during the preparation of this article.


    The technique in which inelastic light scattering (Figure 1) by molecules is greatly enhanced (by factors up to 108 or even larger, enabling single-molecule (SM) SERS in some cases) when the molecules are adsorbed onto corrugated metal surfaces such as silver or gold nanoparticles (NPs). Since its discovery over 40 years ago, it has enjoyed steady growth of interest in the research community, and it has spawned a variety of other spectroscopic techniques that take advantage of enhanced local fields that arise from plasmon excitation in the NPs, for optical phenomena such as fluorescence or nonlinear optics. In addition, the coupling of SERS with atomic force microscopy (AFM) or scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) tips has led to tip-enhanced Raman scattering (TERS), which is a powerful imaging tool. For analytical applications, SERS can be differentiated from many other techniques by the rich vibrational spectroscopic information that it provides, which has led to applications in several different directions, including electrochemistry, catalysis, biology, medicine, art conservation, materials science, and others.

    LENR was driven underground as a pseudoscience.

    If you broke silence you would fall into a reputation trap called... Breaking an Office of Naval Research non-disclosure-agreement.

    Federal Prison is a career trap, so to speak.

    Skeptics like me

    IMHO you are a very poor example of an exemplary skeptic. You are short on logical technical details and your judgement is subjective and inaccurate.

    Robert Nowak worked on the following in 1996. No mention of his 'Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat' work in Hawaii.


    A Summary of NRL Research on Anomalous Effects in Deuterated Palladium Electrochemical Systems

    Quote

    Original distribution authorized to U.S. government agencies only; Test and Evaluation; January 1996


    ONR played a lead role throughout the duration of the Anomalous Effects Program.


    Specifically, Dr. Robert Nowak was the ONR Scientific Officer in charge of coordinating the Program;


    he actively guided discussions that determined the roles of the individual laboratories in the Program.


    In addition, scientific results were informally presented to Dr. Nowak in a series of frequent meetings at NRL and he participated in group discussions that influenced the course of NRL's research.


    Scientific results were formally presented to managements of ONR (Dr. Frederick Saalfeld) and NRL (Drs. Timothy Coffey and Bhakta Rath) approximately every six months.


    NRL and NA WC also provided a series of written reports on a regular basis to ONR that summarized the status of the Program.


    Support for the Anomalous Effects Program was provided by The Office of Naval Research. Them Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Washington, DC provided additional support for all three authors.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors are greatly indebted to Drs. M. Miles, B. Bush and K. Johnson from NAWC, Drs . S. Szpak and P. Mosier-Boss from NCCOSC-NRaD, Dr. M. McKubre and colleagues at SRI, Mr. Roger Hart from Hart R&D, Drs. H. Bergeson and S. Barrowes from the University of Utah, Dr. W. Hansen

    from Utah State, Dr. M. Melich from the Naval Post-Graduate School, Drs. W. Barger, A. Ehrlich, D. Nagel, S. King, W. O'Grady, D. Venezky and J. Murday from NRL and, finally, Drs . D. Rolison and R. Nowak from The Office of Naval Research for many helpful discussions .


    A Summary of NRL Research on Anomalous Effects in Deuterated Palladium Electrochemical Systems

    DAWN D. DOMINGUEZ

    PATRICK L. HAGANS

    Surface Chemistry Branch

    Chemistry' Division

    M. ASHRAF IMAM

    Physical Metallurgy Branch

    Materials Science and Technology Division

    J a n u a r y 9 , 1 9 9 6


    1996 Release

    Original distribution authorized to U.S. government agencies only; Test and Evaluation; January 1996. Other requests shall be referred to Commanding Officer, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5320.


    Twenty Years Later


    In 2016 this document was

    Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited

    2016 Release Includes New Introductions

    by Melvin H. Miles and Pamela A. Mosier-Boss, February 2016


    Source

    apps.dtic.mil was first indexed by Google more than 10 years ago

    Link

    https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA315020.pdf

    Your connection to this site is secure

    Got to Wondering


    The history, skill sets of these two researchers, and the part 'Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat' has played in the development of the GEC SMG molten salt GeNie Reactor, Circa 2012.

    What might this...

    LCF concept.


    Molten Salt Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) Fast Fission Reactor for Lunar and Planetary Surface Power - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)

    ...also what does Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat have to do with the NASA GEC Space Act Agreement announced by Lawrence Forsley at ICCF-21? Is this the culmination of its successful conclusion. Of course we know Larry did not talk about it at ICCF-24.


    History 1988


    Robert worked with Stan and Pam. Raman Scattering I have learned is in the realm of spin and plasmonic surface effects. Finally in 2002 we began to have a unified theory for MRI. I've thought this is relevant to understanding CMNS. I'll look into what Robert went on to do.





    Project Title: Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat

    Project Period: June 1992 to December 1993

    Scientific Officer: Dr. Robert J. Nowak, Chemistry Division, Code 1113, ONR

    Dr. Robert J. Nowak

    Office of Naval Research


    "Electrochemical Charging of Pd Rods"

    Jul 1991 S. Szpak, C.J. Gabriel, J.J. Smith, R.J. Nowak


    "Effect of Electrode Material on SOCl2 Reduction"

    Nov 1990 Pamela Ann Boss, S. Szpak, J. J. Smith, R. J. Nowak


    "LiCl-AlCl3-SOCl2 System. Structures, Species and Equilibria"

    May 1989 Pamela Ann Boss, S. Szpak, J.J. Smith, R.J. Nowak


    "ChemInform Abstract: Raman and IR Spectroscopy of the AlCl3-SOCl2 System"

    Apr 1989 Pamela Ann Boss, R. D. BOSS, C. J. GABRIEL[...], R. J. NOWAK


    "Role of FePc in a Discharging LiSOCl2 Cell"

    Oct 1988 R. J. Nowak, D. R. Rolison, J. J. Smith, S. Szpak


    Robert Nowak 1990 Scientific Editor Naval Research Reviews

    As Scientific Editor Robert knew David Nagel and likely discussed 'Cold Fusion News' of the day. David published the lead article in the1990 'Naval Research Reviews' titled, "Plasma X-Ray Emission: Research, Development and Utilization".

    Curbina THANKS

    Yes The Forsley NASA team has diverse CMNS research developed by the Navy over many years and brought together in a nice package at NASA and GEC today.


    Source

    apps.dtic.mil was first indexed by Google more than 10 years ago

    Link

    Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat
    Summary of Major Accomplishments Experimental Results Electrochemical characterization of Ni electrode system in the hydride- containing molten salts.…
    apps.dtic.mil

    Your connection to this site is secure


    ELECTE Office of Naval Research

    JAN, 5 1994 SA

    Grant No: N00014-92-J-1673

    R&T Code: 413z004srp01

    Project Title: Molten Salt Techniques for Reproducible Excess Heat

    Project Period: June 1992 to December 1993

    Scientific Officer: Dr. Robert J. Nowak, Chemistry Division, Code 1113, ONR

    800 North Quincy St., Arlington, VA 22217-5000

    Grant Officer: Ms. Carlena C. Leufroy, Resident Representative N47092,

    ONR, 565 S. Wilson Ave., Pasadena, CA 91106-3212

    Principal Investigator: Dr. Bor Yann Liaw

    Hawaii Natural Energy Institute

    University of Hawaii at Manoa

    2540 Dole Street, Holmes Hall 246

    Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

    Tel: (808)956-2339, Fax (808)956-2336


    Abstract

    Summary of Major Accomplishments Experimental Results

    Electrochemical characterization of Ni electrode system in the hydride- containing molten salts. Calorimetry measurements of anomalous temperature excursion in the electrolysis of the Ni-H-based molten salt systems. Overview and Conclusion The excess heat generation in molten salt systems are progressing well through the increasing understanding of electrochemical behavior of the cell and the availability of a variety of electrode materials used in the cell. Several issues are still open for improvements the control of the cell behavior, the integrity of anode materials, the role of impurities in excess heat generation, and the threshold loading at elevated temperatures - just to name a few. We are more confident than ever that we can repeat the excess heat phenomenon more frequently, if funds are available to support this effort.


    2. Overview and Conclusion

    The excess heat generation in molten salt systems are progressing well through the increasing understanding of electrochemical behavior of the cell and the availability of a variety of electrode materials used in the cell. Several issues are still open for improvements: the control of the cell behavior, the integrity of anode materials, the role of impurities in excess heat generation, and the threshold loading at elevated temperatures - just to name a few. We are more confident than ever that we can repeat the excess heat phenomenon more frequently, if funds are available to

    support this effort.

    From numerous reports in the recent 4th International Conference on Cold Fusion, it seems dear (clear) to me that D-D fusion was not the origin of the anomalous effects that we have observed in this field. The excess heat effect would be difficult to attribute to any chemical origins. If nuclear origins were the cause of anomalies, many possible reactions are then prevailing in various temperature ranges, generating an array of signatures in both heat and nuclear products, not conforming to any single mechanism. This is a tremendously hard task for the experimentalists and theorists

    to verify each and every of them. This scenario also prohibits a consensus to what have happened to each positive experiments.

    THHuxleynew  Curbina


    In 1993 Peter Gluck's published (ANS peer reviewed) a second paper of greater relevance to NASA LCF and Solid State LENR.


    Article


    The Surfdyn Concept: An Attempt to Solve (or Rename) the Puzzles of Cold Nuclear Fusion

    Peter Glück

    Journal: Fusion Technology, 1993, Volume 24, Number 1, Page 122

    DOI: 10.13182/FST93-A30180

    Abstract

    The lack of reproducibility of the cold fusion experiments, aggravated by the great diversity and inconsistency of the positive results, implies that these nuclear phenomena are hypersensitive, i.e., correlated to a “chaotic” factor. All the factors considered so far, such as structure, transformations, or defects of the crystal lattice; bubbles of deuterium; dendrites, etc., are insufficiently chaotic to explain the known facts.


    Experimental data suggest that nuclear reactions take place in active sites on the surface of the lattice, that they are stimulated by dynamics factors, and that they represent an extreme form of heterogeneous catalysis. Consequently, according to modern ideas concerning catalysis, the desired chaotic factor is the surface dynamics of some metallic deutendes (hydrides).


    This hypothesis, called the surfdyn concept, is compatible with all published data, explains the peculiarities of cold fusion, and must be supported by an adequate theory describing the nature and mechanisms of the different nuclear processes.


    ANS / Publications / Journals / Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 24 / Number 1 / Pages 122-126

    Which is why I invite you to read Peter Gluck 1991 in regards to Solid State

    His early article is relevant here today.

    Published: May 1991

    Cold nuclear fusion in thin foils of palladium

    Evelina Palibroda & P. Glück

    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry volume 154, pages153–161 (1991)

    Abstract

    Positive evidence for cold nuclear fusion in an electrochemical cell with a palladium thin foil cathode was obtained. After adding thiourea to the cell, seven successive emissions of neutrons (detected as thermal neutrons) alternating with inactive periods were registered. The maximum intensity (300 times the background) and duration (12.7 h) were attained in the fifth emission.

    IMHO made his judgement subjective and inaccurate.

    (1) Personalised conspiracy theories

    (2) Did not engage with technical details

    Humble opinions of value to you. Your opinions have yet to hold value to me.


    My opinion of Peter Gluck isn't humble. In many ways he was a better man than you or me.

    Benyo says that when she would handle samples after an experiment, they were very warm.

    Certainly not 'cold fusion'... just warm enough to hold in my hand. Like HOT fusion. Ok... warm fusion.


    NASA and the US Navy have demonstrated Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) and the Fusion-Fast-Fission of natural uranium and thorium

    Two types of LENR non-fissile and fissile

    “What we did was not cold fusion,” says Lawrence Forsley

    Bull Shit

    Both methods build upon decades of research, and the latter benefits from conventional nuclear fission and fusion results.

    Quote

    "the latter benefits from conventional nuclear fission and fusion results"-endquote note- results i.e. meaning fission and fusion research


    LCF is the former of the two types of LENR mentioned. My guess is it benefits from years of research in nano plasmonics. Transmutation and much much more... self organizing plasma on a nano femto scale is my guess.


    Which is why I invite you to read Peter Gluck 1991 in regards to Solid State

    His early article is relevant here today.

    Molten salts can be used instead as was demonstrated at the University of Hawaii 8 using a variety of Ni and Pd cathodes in lithiated, hydrided and deuterated salts.


    Curbina

    Hawaii? Nice lead. Thanks


    I find it difficult to stay up to date on this nascent technology.

    CMNS energy technologies, not only one for sure.

    Nanoplasmonics 1969

    Consider.

    Fleischmann was pondering such matters... Thinking along these lines. Led him to an award in 1986. Quite the electrochemist, I'd say.

    Abstract

    In crystals of the rocksalt structure the electro-optic coefficient as well as the first derivative of the electronic polarizability with respect to an ionic displacement vanishes because every ion is at a center of inversion. Consequently, the zone center optical phonons are inactive in first order Raman scattering.


    However, these phonons are infrared active, and the transverse optical (TO) phonons form polaritons when the retardation of the Coulomb interaction is taken into account.


    Because of the axial vector character of the magnetic field, the first derivative of the electronic polarizability with respect to the macroscopic magnetic field associated with the polaritons does not vanish in rocksalt type crystals.


    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

    Volume 31, Issue 5, May 1970, Pages 1075-1083

    Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

    A Theory of the First Order Raman Scattering of Light by Polaritons in Crystals of the Rocksalt Structure

    A.A.Maradudin∗S.Ushioda

    Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine, Calif. 92664, U.S.A.

    Received 8 September 1969, Revised 27 October 1969, Available online 20 September 2002.



    Thus the polaritons in crystals of the rocksalt structure can give rise to first order Raman scattering. In this note we present a theory of the Raman scattering intensity by polaritons via the magneto-optic effect, and estimate the intensity of the light scattered by this mechanism.

    https://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com › ...

    Generalized Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation Nuclear Fusion for Hydrogen-Metal System

    by Yeong E. Kim Department of Physics, Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. Direct download. ABSTRACT Generalized theory of Bose-Einstein...


    Also


    References


    Y. E. Kim, “Theory of Bose-Einstein Condensation Mechanism for Deuteron-Induced Nuclear Reactions in Micro/Nano-Scale Metal Grains and Particles”, Naturwissenschaften 96, 803 (2009) and references therein.


    Y. E. Kim, “Bose-Einstein Condensate Theory of Deuteron Fusion in Metal”, J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 4, 188 (2010), Proceedings of Symposium on New Energy Technologies, the 239th National Meeting of American Chemical Society, San Francisco, March 21-26, 2010.


    Y. E. Kim, “Theoretical interpretation of anomalous tritium and neutron productions during Pd/D co-deposition experiments”, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 31101 (2010).


    Y. E. Kim and A. L. Zubarev,

    “Mixtures of Charged Bosons Confined in Harmonic Traps and Bose-Einstein Condensation Mechanism for Low Energy Nuclear Reactions and Transmutation Processes in Condensed Matter”, Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Cold Fusion, Marseilles, France, 31 October – 5 November, 2006, World Scientific Publishing Co., pp. 711-717.


    Andrea Rossi, “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CARRYING OUT NICKEL AND HYDROGEN EXOTHERMAL REACTION”, United States Patent Application Publication (Pub. No.: US 2011/0005506 A1, Pub. Date: Jan. 13, 2011); http://www.wipo.int/patentscope/search/ja/WO2009125444.



    S. Focardi and A. Rossi, “A new energy source from nuclear fusion”, March 22, 2010. http://www.nyteknik.se/incomin…/Rossi-Forcardi_paper.pdf

    https://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=66 , February 2010

    H. Essen and S. Kullander, “Experimental test of a mini-Rossi device at the Leonardocorp, Bologna, 29 March 2011”, a travel report, April 3, 2011; http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter…energi/article3144827.ece

    Table of Isotopes, 8th Edition, Volume I: A = 1-150, edited by R. B. Firestone et al., published by John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1999), pages 270 and 284.

    Reactions (ii) were suggested by T. E. Ward, private communication, May 11, 2011.

    Y. E. Kim, “Deuteron Fusion in Micro/Nano-Scale Metal Particles”, an invited talk to be presented at the Fifth Asia Pacific Conference on Few-Body Problems in Physics 2011(APFB2011), August 22-26, 2011, Seoul, Korea. (http://www.apctp.org/conferences/2011/APFB2011/)

    A bit of Ego Out history 2012

    Peter Gluck certainly pushed the dry cell vs wet cell debate. Plasma electrolysis,

    high temperature, etc. I think he influenced a few teams direction in a positive way.

    Big Thanks - Gregory Goble 2022

    Rest in Peace ✌️

    Quote Peter Gluck

    In 1989 when I have joined the Cold Fusion movement irreversibly, I was convinced that the first technologies will appear no later than in 5 years. My unique worries were the scarcity of the magic metal palladium and the expected production of lower currency energy that cannot be converted in electric energy. However the vision of a world using cold fusion energy was quite natural and vivid.

    The problem of bad reproducibility became “a rich source of troubles, despair and skeptics from the start of the cold fusion story” as I wrote during the third year of CF history. Take care please, I was speaking about ‘troubles” and not problems (problems are solved, troubles, in the best case get old and fade away) because I already was disappointed with the passive approach- advanced calorimetric methods instead of radical measures for intensification of the heat release.


    It was then an open question, in which extent the active, creative method was THEN possible?


    Was THEN possible- in principle to understand what happens scientifically, to build a working theory that can lead to good, repeatable, controllable experiments?


    Was THEN feasible to start an action of scale up and technological development?


    It is more important to answer today; so many years later to the same question- can be the existential and developmental problems of the classic CF/LENR systems solved?


    Are they actually solvable in principle?


    According to my 20 Rules of Problem Solving-appended to this for your convenience to this editorial, after the Igari Mizuno abstract, Rule No. 18 is special for unsolvable problems. These can be solved only if their premises are radically changed. In the same manner, cold fusion has to be metamorphosed in such an extent that even its parents could not more recognize it, in order to become productive indeed..


    This metamorphoses can be described in the style of the problem solving rules- by “complete definition. An other quotation from Henry Moore wisely states:

    To know one thing, you must know the opposite. Therefore a good definition combines a negative one- what the thing, concept is NOT with what it actually is, or has to be. The list is still not complete. Usable, energy generating cold fusion is:

    Accomplished NOT by Science First, BUT by Technology first;


    Created NOT via Theory, BUT using smart Engineering,


    Based NOT on wet (aqueous) systems BUT only in vapor phase;


    Working not at low temperatures (> 100 C), BUT at higher ones (>200 C);


    Using NOT palladium, BUT transition metals *e.g.) nickel:


    Using NOT deuterium, BUT light hydrogen;


    Being NOT simple, static, linear, BUT complex, dynamic,


    Structured NOT as one step, BUT multi-step multi-phase;


    Belonging NOT to electrochemistry, BUT to nanoplasmonics;


    Incorporating NOT nuclear reactions, BUT nuclear interactions;


    Correctly called NOT LENR BUT LENR+, HENI


    I make the most pernicious assertion include here explicit:


    “The reproducibility problem and scale up practically cannot be solved for WET cold fusion systems- as the FP Cell. Wet systems are technologically dead."


    This will not contribute much to my popularity, but I would be very happy if somebody proves this is idiotic, with data, solid data, and longer term. The simplest reasons for this:


    First reason: it seems that deep degassing of the active surface is an absolute necessity; the presence of any non hydrogen gas inactivates fatally the cathodes. Purely electrochemical tricks as electrode inversion and co-deposition are not effective to solve the dreadful reproducibility problem


    Second reason the spatial density of the places or zones where the reactions that generate heat, happens is much too low and decreases fast in time


    Third reason, due to the presence of a water (heavy or light) phase the temperature is limited to ~100 C, high pressure electrolysis cells are inconvenient. Recent discoveries converge to showing that a higher temperature is able to accelerate the reactions considerably- a sine qua non condition for scale up.


    Fourth reason- it seems electrolysis cannot deliver deuterium or hydrogen in the necessary active form.


    ATTENTION PLEASE; this: “wet systems, no technology” is my direct message too, for Eijiro Igari and Tadahiko Mizuno- I hope one of my readers will let them know before they start the presentation at JCF14.


    Mizuno is the greatest specialist worldwide in plasma electrolysis- and this is NOT a wet system because the active site of the cathode is not in contact with water, but with plasma.


    Strictly in principle plasma electrolysis is NOT hopeless. I cannot do more; I am not able to communicate in Japanese.


    Help us please!

    Peter


    Reference and Further Reading


    Peter Gluck
    1937 - 2021

    Peter Gluck

    We recently learned that our friend and colleague Dr. Peter Gluck passed away on March 23, 2021 at the age of 83. Given that he contributed so much to the cold fusion field, it is quite fitting that the day he left this earthly realm was the anniversary date of the Pons-Fleischmann cold fusion announcement of March 23, 1989.

    In addition to writing numerous articles for Infinite Energy, Dr. Gluck served on our Scientific Advisory Board from 1995 until his death.

    Dr. Gluck received his Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Jassy Technical Institute in 1983. He held a position at the Romanian National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies from 1991 until his retirement in 1999.


    He became active in the cold fusion field in the early 1990s, and published his first paper in the field in 1991 (Palibroda, E. and Gluck, P. 1991. “Cold Nuclear Fusion in Thin Foils of Palladium,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 154, 153-161).


    Dr. Gluck had an optimistic outlook on life and scientific research. In an article in the first issue of Infinite Energy, he wrote: "Accept both the positive and the negative results, that is, be positive toward both, and make use of both." He noted that he had "used negative data to obtain positive and possibly essential information."

    Currently, Dr. Gluck’s blog website Ego Out is still active at:

    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/.


    He posted from 2010 to 2018, with a final posting earlier this year, for a total of 1,408 posts over the years.


    The blogs are dedicated almost exclusively to various aspects of the LENR field. Dr. Gluck publicized his site widely and it became a sort of informal forum, with commentary and debate from readers.


    In 2020, Thomas Grimshaw and David Nagel started the Ego Out Documentation Project (EODP), a project of the LENR Research Documentation Initiative led by Grimshaw. As part of this project, they archived all of the pages of Dr. Gluck’s blog site, which will be useful in the future if the website goes defunct. See a report about this collection in Infinite Energy #151/152.


    As a testament to his ever-positive outlook, in one of our last communications with Dr. Gluck, he wrote: "During my next reincarnation I will solve the problem of cold fusion."-endquotes


    GBGOBLENOTE

    THHuxleynew  Ascoli65

    LENR FAQ for Students

    Peter Gluck's cold fusion paper was published in a notable peer reviewed journal in 1991.

    For space enthusiasts like me, this is a great place to learn everything about advanced space propulsion systems that will be powered by emergent NASA CMNS energy technologies... Not "Cold Fusion" so to speak.. Yet the 'cold fusion' of Pons and Fleischmann never was cold in some nano spots was it, Lawrence? It was also 'lattice confinement fusion' in a wet cell rather than a dry cell electro chemical nano nuclear environment.


    Food for thought since before the days when Peter Gluck pushed the dry cell vs wet cell debate. He called it Nanoplasmonic LENR


    Anyways

    I'm sure the NASA and Global Energy Corporation researches all know that Pons and Fleischmann were clearly vindicated many, many years ago, by the U.S. Government energetics research community at large.


    It's time to bring folks up to date.


    This Atomic Rockets post is well worth reading in it's entirety. From way down in the Lattice Confinement Fusion section.


    Atomic Rockets

    Powerplant Introduction

    Power Generation

    Link

    Power Plant - Atomic Rockets


    Quote


    “What we did was not cold fusion,” says Lawrence Forsley, a senior lead experimental physicist for the project. Cold fusion, the idea that fusion can occur at relatively low energies in room-temperature materials, is viewed with skepticism by the vast majority of physicists. Forsley stresses this is hot fusion, but “We’ve come up with a new way of driving it.”


    (Not that new. Not proprietary certainly)


    “Lattice confinement fusion initially has lower temperatures and pressures” than something like a tokamak, says Benyo. But “where the actual deuteron-deuteron fusion takes place is in these very hot, energetic locations.” Benyo says that when she would handle samples after an experiment, they were very warm. That warmth is partially from the fusion, but the energetic photons initiating the process also contribute heat.

    There’s still plenty of research to be done by the NASA team. Now they’ve demonstrated nuclear fusion, the next step is to create reactions that are more efficient and more numerous. When two deuterons fuse, they create either a proton and tritium (a hydrogen atom with two neutrons), or helium-3 and a neutron. In the latter case, that extra neutron can start the process over again, allowing two more deuterons to fuse. The team plans to experiment with ways to coax more consistent and sustained reactions in the metal.

    Benyo says that the ultimate goal is still to be able to power a deep-space mission with lattice confinement fusion. Power, space, and weight are all at a premium on a spacecraft, and this method of fusion offers a potentially reliable source for craft operating in places where solar panels may not be useable, for example. And of course, what works in space could be used on Earth.-endquotes


    Post Script - Requested Reference

    Peter Gluck

    1937 - 2021

    In Memory of Peter Gluck - Infinite Energy Magazine

    Gluck, P. 1991. “Cold Nuclear Fusion in Thin Foils of Palladium,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 154, 153-161)


    Quote Infinite Energy Magazine


    Currently, Dr. Gluck’s blog website Ego Out is still active: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/.


    He posted from 2010 to 2018, with a final posting earlier this year, for a total of 1,408 posts over the years. The blogs are dedicated almost exclusively to various aspects of the LENR field. Dr. Gluck publicized his site widely and it became a sort of informal forum, with commentary and debate from readers.


    In 2020, Thomas Grimshaw and David Nagel started the Ego Out Documentation Project (EODP), a project of the LENR Research Documentation Initiative led by Grimshaw. As part of this project, they archived all of the pages of Dr. Gluck’s blog site, which will be useful in the future if the website goes defunct. See a report about this collection in Infinite Energy #151/152.


    As a testament to his ever-positive outlook, in one of our last communications with Dr. Gluck, he wrote: "During my next reincarnation I will solve the problem of cold fusion."-endquotes

    THHuxleynew  Ascoli65

    gbgoblenote-Peter Gluck published his paper in a peer reviewed journal in 1991.


    “The reproducibility problem and scale up practically cannot be solved for WET cold fusion systems- as the FP Cell. Wet systems are technologically dead."

    I am reviewing each reference in the White Paper. I am also trying to determine the date of publication by doing so...


    This reference is "under review" and has been "redacted". Quite a list of authors.


    Anyone have a link to this?


    [DECH21] DeChiaro, L. F., Forsley, L.P. , Mosier-Boss, P.A., Steinetz, B.M., Hendricks, R.C., Long, K.J., Rayms-Keller, P., Shea, M., Barker, S., Benyo, T.L., Pines, V., Chait, A., Sandifer, II, C.E., Ellis, D. L., Locci, I. and Jennings, W.D., “A Multi-Laboratory Study of [Redacted] LENR Codeposition Experiments”, in review (2022).

    THHuxleynew Please don't even try to argue that this is not related to, or not of a lineage from, Pons' and Fleischmann's outstanding 1989 research, erroneously dubbed 'cold fusion'. 'Energy beyond chemical from some unknown atomic process' is how Fleischmann often and accurately described it.


    From the NASA GEC LCF White Paper


    Quote

    NASA has supported the underlying LCF science for a decade. However, Lattice Confinement Fusion and fusion-fast-fission technologies are the next steps to solve NASA, NRO, Navy, Army, US Space

    Force and commercial energy needs. Although other agencies like DARPA have funded limited research, and ARPA-E has expressed interest, NASA has developed an unmatched team and key facilities. By advancing this research into a technology, NASA builds on its capabilities, solves its problems, and in turn attracts additional public and private partners. World-wide, NASA is viewed as working for all of humanity by forging and deploying new technologies. -end quotes

    Accessing Icy World Oceans Using Lattice Confinement Fusion Fast Fission

    Thanks Ahlfors for posting that NASA paper...


    Here is another important paper.


    LENR FAQ for Students

    Quite a few researchers have worked years getting paid a good salary to research Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. While some have spent only a portion of their salaried time in this endeavor, others have made a full time career of it. - gbgoble2022september


    NASA GRC-LCF-GEC SPAWAR 2022


    White Paper

    Lattice Confinement Fusion and Fusion-Fast-Fission Energy Source Development

    L.P. Forsley1,2 , T. L. Benyo3 , P. A. Mosier-Boss1 and B. Steinetz3

    Abstract

    NASA and the US Navy have demonstrated Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) and the Fusion-Fast-Fission of natural uranium and thorium. Both methods build upon decades of research, and the latter benefits from conventional nuclear fission and fusion results. However, this nascent technology doesn’t require fissile isotopes and avoids nuclear weapons proliferation concerns from uranium 235U isotopic enrichment or plutonium 239Pu separation. Of particular note, LCF doesn’t need power hungry magnets, lasers, or particle beams. Potentially, it could provide watts to hundreds of kilowatts of electrical power and process heat suitable for space power and high Isp nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) as well as distributed terrestrial power. Finally, there are indications that LCF fast-fission products are more benign than those of conventional fission reactors. Our goal is to scale the reactions and increase the power output through higher temperature operation and increased material masses.

    Background

    Co-deposition, or the simultaneous electrolytic reduction and loading of palladium and deuterium, was invented by the US Navy as US Patent 8,419,919, “System and Method for Generating Particles”.

    This protocol is one means of loading hydrogen isotopic fuel at very high densities in solid lattices, including thorium and uranium. Building upon three decades of research conducted with the US Navy SPAWAR [SZPA91], [MOSI16], the Naval Surface Warfare Centers [DECH15], [DECH21] and the NASA Glenn Research Center [STEI20], [SMIT21] we have continued to explore, observe, model and understand LCF science. We have characterized the fusion, activation and fast-fission products through experimental nuclear product observations and material assays, and modeled reactions using SRIM/TRIM, Density Functional Theory (Quantum Espresso) [DECH15], LANL Monte-Carlo Nuclear Modeling (MCNP®) and CERN GEANT-4 [BARA21] codes.


    Source

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is an independent agency of the US federal government responsible for the civil space program, aeronautics research, and space research.


    A NASA/GRC and GEC/U.S. Navy "LCF" 'Cold Fusion', LENR - Condensed Matter Nuclear Science White PAPER 2022

    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210026340/downloads/White%20Paper%20regarding%20LCF%20and%20Fusion-fast-fisson.pdf

    Your connection to this site is secure

    Perhaps off topic yet an important bit of history relevant to this thread...

    An excellent read.


    Vindicated?

    Yes CMNS papers are peer reviewed.


    Quote

    I was the release authority for the 30+ peer-reviewed articles in LENR.

    Also quote

    In another case, when Shanahan wrote a rebuttal to a review article by Krivit and

    Marwan where he raised a number of issues in the areas of calorimetry, heat after death, elemental transmutation, energetic particle detection using CR-39, and the

    temporal correlation between heat and helium-4. Pam took the lead to respond.

    She organized and co-authored:


    “A new look at low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) research: a response to Shanahan.”


    In addition to Pam, the authors included Jan Marwan, Mike McKubre, Fran Tanzella, Peter Hagelstein, Mel Miles, Mitchell Swartz, Ed Storms, Prof. Iwamura, and Larry Forsley. There may be a lot of disagreements between those authors but Pam pulled them together to land a knock-out punch.


    When last seen, Shanahan was crawling back under a rock

    End Quotes


    LENR FAQ for Students

    Reference


    "Comments about Pam Boss Upon Receipt of the Preparata Award"

    Source

    The University of Missouri is a public land-grant research university in Columbia, Missouri. It is Missouri's largest university and the flagship of the four-campus University of Missouri System. MU was founded in 1839 and was the first public university west of the Mississippi River.

    Article link

    https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36812/CommentsAboutPamBoss.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

    Your connection to this site is secure.


    Further references

    A new look at low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research: A response to Shanahan

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45509281_A_new_look_at_low-energy_nuclear_reaction_LENR_research_A_response_to_Shanahan

    • August 2010
    • Journal of Environmental Monitoring 12(9)

    DOI:10.1039/c0em00267d

    • Source
    • PubMed

    Feb 3rd 2016

    General LENR Talks

    …larger than the measurement errors. For example, in a variety of 2 experiments, the solid-state nuclear track detector background was less than 1 track/mm whereas the signal exceeded 10,000 tracks/mm2! "Excess heat production in Szpak and Mosier-Boss’ electrolytic Pd/D co-deposition system was first measured by Miles

    and then replicated by Letts.

    Kitimura

    and Ahern…


    I wonder if hydrogen would be able to flow through such thick wall.

    Does high temperature increase permeability?


    The following article covers this subject in regards to the...


    Johnson Matthew Hydrogen Purifier

    500+ K operating temperature


    I wonder what temperature and pressure Fralick and Benyo worked with?



    From 1989

    Johnson Matthey Technology Review

    Journal Archive

    Platinum Metals Rev., 1989, 33, (1), 9

    The Clean-Up of Fusion Reactor Waste Gases

    A Study of the Effects of Impurities on Silver-Palladium

    D.R.C.

    The Clean-Up of Fusion Reactor Waste Gases - technology.matthey.com

    we have a process to deal with conventional nuclear fission waste, and generate energy

    Many leading Condensed Matter Nuclear Science researchers are Nuclear Fission and Fusion Physicists. CMNS research and data will improve our understanding of conventional fission and fusion concepts and schemes pursued today.

    Hybrid systems that transmute nuclear waste to benign elements while providing process heat to power the turbines may prove to be the most valuable LENR technology emergent from the US government cold fusion research programs.

    Further References

    “DTRA: Investigation of Nano-Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter Final Report” June 2016 Affiliation: US Navy SPAWAR-PAC, Global Energy Corporation, University of New Mexico, University of Austin


    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307594560_DTRA_INVESTIGATION_OF_NANO-NUCLEAR_REACTIONS_IN_CONDENSED_MATTER_FINAL_REPORT